All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
	Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/npu: Allocate enough memory in pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group()
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:34:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190112073441.GJ14180@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190112054426.GF1743@kadam>

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:44:26AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 11:30:35AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:23:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > There is a typo so we accidentally allocate enough memory for a pointer
> > > when we wanted to allocate enough for a struct.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0bd971676e68 ("powerpc/powernv/npu: Add compound IOMMU groups")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > > index d7f742ed48ba..3f58c7dbd581 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ struct iommu_table_group *pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
> > >  		}
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		/* Create a group for 1 GPU and attached NPUs for POWER8 */
> > > -		pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(pe->npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +		pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(*pe->npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > To avoid these in the future, I wonder if instead of sizeof(pe->npucomp), we insist on
> > sizeof structure
> > 
> > pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> 
> The latest kernel fashion is sizeof(*ptr).  It can go wrong either way.
> I don't have strong feelings about it.  These sorts of bugs don't last
> long because they're caught in testing or with static analysis.

And it is easy to see someone forgot the * in "sizeof *ptr", and with
experience it will just automatically look wrong if it is forgotten; but
it isn't obvious at all if the wrong struct is used, which cannot happen
with the *ptr form, but happens frequently with the "sizeof(struct x)"
form.


Segher

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
	Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/npu: Allocate enough memory in pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group()
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 01:34:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190112073441.GJ14180@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190112054426.GF1743@kadam>

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:44:26AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 11:30:35AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:23:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > There is a typo so we accidentally allocate enough memory for a pointer
> > > when we wanted to allocate enough for a struct.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0bd971676e68 ("powerpc/powernv/npu: Add compound IOMMU groups")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > > index d7f742ed48ba..3f58c7dbd581 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> > > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ struct iommu_table_group *pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
> > >  		}
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		/* Create a group for 1 GPU and attached NPUs for POWER8 */
> > > -		pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(pe->npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +		pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(*pe->npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > To avoid these in the future, I wonder if instead of sizeof(pe->npucomp), we insist on
> > sizeof structure
> > 
> > pe->npucomp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct npucomp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> 
> The latest kernel fashion is sizeof(*ptr).  It can go wrong either way.
> I don't have strong feelings about it.  These sorts of bugs don't last
> long because they're caught in testing or with static analysis.

And it is easy to see someone forgot the * in "sizeof *ptr", and with
experience it will just automatically look wrong if it is forgotten; but
it isn't obvious at all if the wrong struct is used, which cannot happen
with the *ptr form, but happens frequently with the "sizeof(struct x)"
form.


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-12  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-09 10:23 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv/npu: Allocate enough memory in pnv_try_setup_npu_table_group() Dan Carpenter
2019-01-09 10:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-09 11:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-09 11:54   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-11  2:12   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-01-11  2:12     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-01-12  0:30 ` Balbir Singh
2019-01-12  0:30   ` Balbir Singh
2019-01-12  5:44   ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-12  5:44     ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-12  7:34     ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2019-01-12  7:34       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-01-12 10:51       ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-12 10:51         ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-14 10:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-14 10:12   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190112073441.GJ14180@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhairgrove@nvidia.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.