From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190117154821.GC9094@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8eb70db4-92a2-95a2-075c-f26690aab3ed@arm.com>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:57:39AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
> I wanted to test this patch (and try to benchmark having the "mov x9,
> x30" always present in function prelude vs having two nops), but I
> cannot get this patch to apply (despite having a version including both
> commits below).
>
> Could you provide a git branch from which I could try to rebase the
> patch? (Or a new version of the series)
It also applies with just a single, harmless fuzz 1 onto 5.0-rc2.
Does that help?
I'm currently over v7, with Mark's requests included and the mov patching
done only once at bootup...
Torsten
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190117154821.GC9094@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8eb70db4-92a2-95a2-075c-f26690aab3ed@arm.com>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:57:39AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
> I wanted to test this patch (and try to benchmark having the "mov x9,
> x30" always present in function prelude vs having two nops), but I
> cannot get this patch to apply (despite having a version including both
> commits below).
>
> Could you provide a git branch from which I could try to rebase the
> patch? (Or a new version of the series)
It also applies with just a single, harmless fuzz 1 onto 5.0-rc2.
Does that help?
I'm currently over v7, with Mark's requests included and the mov patching
done only once at bootup...
Torsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-04 14:10 [PATCH v6] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-01-04 14:10 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-04 17:50 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-04 17:50 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-04 18:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-04 18:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-04 22:41 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-04 22:41 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-05 11:05 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-05 11:05 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-05 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-05 20:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-07 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-07 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-14 12:13 ` Balbir Singh
2019-01-14 12:13 ` Balbir Singh
2019-01-14 12:26 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-14 12:26 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-16 15:56 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-16 15:56 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-16 18:01 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-16 18:01 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-07 4:57 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-01-07 4:57 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-01-16 9:57 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-16 9:57 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-16 10:08 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-16 10:08 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-17 15:48 ` Torsten Duwe [this message]
2019-01-17 15:48 ` Torsten Duwe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190117154821.GC9094@lst.de \
--to=duwe@lst.de \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.