[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: jz4780: Add compatible string for JZ4725B SoC

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: jz4780: Add compatible string for JZ4725B SoC

[Paul Cercueil]

Add a compatible string to support the memory controller built into the
JZ4725B SoC from Ingenic.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt       | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
index f936b5589b19..7cce6d761f2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ controller in Ingenic JZ4780
 
 Required properties:
 - compatible: Should be set to one of:
+    "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc" (JZ4725B)
     "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" (JZ4780)
 - reg: Should specify the NEMC controller registers location and length.
 - clocks: Clock for the NEMC controller.
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH 2/4] memory: Kconfig: Drop dependency on MACH_JZ4780 for jz4780

[Paul Cercueil]

Depending on MACH_JZ4780 prevent us from creating a generic kernel that
works on more than one MIPS board. Instead, we just depend on MIPS being
set.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
---
 drivers/memory/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
index 2d91b00e3591..3d411575fcb6 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ config FSL_IFC
 config JZ4780_NEMC
 	bool "Ingenic JZ4780 SoC NEMC driver"
 	default y
-	depends on MACH_JZ4780 || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on MIPS || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on HAS_IOMEM && OF
 	help
 	  This driver is for the NAND/External Memory Controller (NEMC) in
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] memory: Kconfig: Drop dependency on MACH_JZ4780 for jz4780

[Boris Brezillon]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:45:48 -0300
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Depending on MACH_JZ4780 prevent us from creating a generic kernel that
> works on more than one MIPS board. Instead, we just depend on MIPS being
> set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/memory/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> index 2d91b00e3591..3d411575fcb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ config FSL_IFC
>  config JZ4780_NEMC
>  	bool "Ingenic JZ4780 SoC NEMC driver"
>  	default y
> -	depends on MACH_JZ4780 || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on MIPS || COMPILE_TEST
>  	depends on HAS_IOMEM && OF
>  	help
>  	  This driver is for the NAND/External Memory Controller (NEMC) in

[PATCH 3/4] memory: jz4780-nemc: Reduce size of const array

[Paul Cercueil]

The maximum value found in that array is 15, there's no need to store
these values as uint32_t, a uint8_t is enough.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
---
 drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
index bcf06adefc96..ef3f20e46590 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 	 * Conversion of tBP and tAW cycle counts to values supported by the
 	 * hardware (round up to the next supported value).
 	 */
-	static const uint32_t convert_tBP_tAW[] = {
+	static const u8 convert_tBP_tAW[] = {
 		0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
 
 		/* 11 - 12 -> 12 cycles */
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 			return false;
 		}
 
-		smcr |= convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TBP_SHIFT;
+		smcr |= (u32)convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TBP_SHIFT;
 	}
 
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAW", &val) == 0) {
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 			return false;
 		}
 
-		smcr |= convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TAW_SHIFT;
+		smcr |= (u32)convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TAW_SHIFT;
 	}
 
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tSTRV", &val) == 0) {
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] memory: jz4780-nemc: Reduce size of const array

[Boris Brezillon]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:45:49 -0300
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> The maximum value found in that array is 15, there's no need to store
> these values as uint32_t, a uint8_t is enough.

Is it really worth the additional cast you add in the code?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
> index bcf06adefc96..ef3f20e46590 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>  	 * Conversion of tBP and tAW cycle counts to values supported by the
>  	 * hardware (round up to the next supported value).
>  	 */
> -	static const uint32_t convert_tBP_tAW[] = {
> +	static const u8 convert_tBP_tAW[] = {
>  		0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
>  
>  		/* 11 - 12 -> 12 cycles */
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>  			return false;
>  		}
>  
> -		smcr |= convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TBP_SHIFT;
> +		smcr |= (u32)convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TBP_SHIFT;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAW", &val) == 0) {
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>  			return false;
>  		}
>  
> -		smcr |= convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TAW_SHIFT;
> +		smcr |= (u32)convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TAW_SHIFT;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tSTRV", &val) == 0) {

Re: [PATCH 3/4] memory: jz4780-nemc: Reduce size of const array

[Paul Cercueil]

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:15 AM, Boris Brezillon 
<bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:45:49 -0300
> Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net <mailto:paul@crapouillou.net>> 
> wrote:
> 
>>  The maximum value found in that array is 15, there's no need to 
>> store
>>  these values as uint32_t, a uint8_t is enough.
> 
> Is it really worth the additional cast you add in the code?

They're not needed. I had to verify, because it was not obvious to me.
I'll remove them then.

>> 
>>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net 
>> <mailto:paul@crapouillou.net>>
>>  ---
>>   drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>>  diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c 
>> b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
>>  index bcf06adefc96..ef3f20e46590 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
>>  +++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
>>  @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct 
>> jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>>   	 * Conversion of tBP and tAW cycle counts to values supported by 
>> the
>>   	 * hardware (round up to the next supported value).
>>   	 */
>>  -	static const uint32_t convert_tBP_tAW[] = {
>>  +	static const u8 convert_tBP_tAW[] = {
>>   		0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
>> 
>>   		/* 11 - 12 -> 12 cycles */
>>  @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct 
>> jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>>   			return false;
>>   		}
>> 
>>  -		smcr |= convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TBP_SHIFT;
>>  +		smcr |= (u32)convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TBP_SHIFT;
>>   	}
>> 
>>   	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAW", &val) == 0) {
>>  @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct 
>> jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>>   			return false;
>>   		}
>> 
>>  -		smcr |= convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TAW_SHIFT;
>>  +		smcr |= (u32)convert_tBP_tAW[cycles] << NEMC_SMCR_TAW_SHIFT;
>>   	}
>> 
>>   	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tSTRV", &val) == 0) {
> 

[PATCH 4/4] memory: jz4780_nemc: Add support for the JZ4725B

[Paul Cercueil]

Add support for the JZ4725B SoC from Ingenic.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
---
 drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
index ef3f20e46590..c472a22d6df5 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
@@ -44,9 +44,14 @@
 #define NEMC_NFCSR_NFCEn(n)	BIT((((n) - 1) << 1) + 1)
 #define NEMC_NFCSR_TNFEn(n)	BIT(16 + (n) - 1)
 
+struct jz_soc_info {
+	u8 tas_tah_cycles_max;
+};
+
 struct jz4780_nemc {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct device *dev;
+	const struct jz_soc_info *soc_info;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	uint32_t clk_period;
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAS", &val) == 0) {
 		smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAS_MASK;
 		cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
-		if (cycles > 15) {
+		if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
 			dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAS %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
 				val, cycles);
 			return false;
@@ -214,7 +219,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAH", &val) == 0) {
 		smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAH_MASK;
 		cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
-		if (cycles > 15) {
+		if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
 			dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAH %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
 				val, cycles);
 			return false;
@@ -278,6 +283,10 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!nemc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	nemc->soc_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!nemc->soc_info)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	spin_lock_init(&nemc->lock);
 	nemc->dev = dev;
 
@@ -370,8 +379,17 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct jz_soc_info jz4725b_soc_info = {
+	.tas_tah_cycles_max = 7,
+};
+
+static const struct jz_soc_info jz4780_soc_info = {
+	.tas_tah_cycles_max = 15,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id jz4780_nemc_dt_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" },
+	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc", .data = &jz4725b_soc_info, },
+	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc", .data = &jz4780_soc_info, },
 	{},
 };
 
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] memory: jz4780_nemc: Add support for the JZ4725B

[Boris Brezillon]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:45:50 -0300
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Add support for the JZ4725B SoC from Ingenic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>

I don't know anything about the JZ4725B constraints but the code looks
good, so

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
> index ef3f20e46590..c472a22d6df5 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
> @@ -44,9 +44,14 @@
>  #define NEMC_NFCSR_NFCEn(n)	BIT((((n) - 1) << 1) + 1)
>  #define NEMC_NFCSR_TNFEn(n)	BIT(16 + (n) - 1)
>  
> +struct jz_soc_info {
> +	u8 tas_tah_cycles_max;
> +};
> +
>  struct jz4780_nemc {
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	struct device *dev;
> +	const struct jz_soc_info *soc_info;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	uint32_t clk_period;
> @@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>  	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAS", &val) == 0) {
>  		smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAS_MASK;
>  		cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
> -		if (cycles > 15) {
> +		if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
>  			dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAS %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
>  				val, cycles);
>  			return false;
> @@ -214,7 +219,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
>  	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAH", &val) == 0) {
>  		smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAH_MASK;
>  		cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
> -		if (cycles > 15) {
> +		if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
>  			dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAH %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
>  				val, cycles);
>  			return false;
> @@ -278,6 +283,10 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!nemc)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	nemc->soc_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!nemc->soc_info)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	spin_lock_init(&nemc->lock);
>  	nemc->dev = dev;
>  
> @@ -370,8 +379,17 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct jz_soc_info jz4725b_soc_info = {
> +	.tas_tah_cycles_max = 7,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct jz_soc_info jz4780_soc_info = {
> +	.tas_tah_cycles_max = 15,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id jz4780_nemc_dt_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" },
> +	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc", .data = &jz4725b_soc_info, },
> +	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc", .data = &jz4780_soc_info, },
>  	{},
>  };
>  

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: jz4780: Add compatible string for JZ4725B SoC

[Boris Brezillon]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:45:47 -0300
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Add a compatible string to support the memory controller built into the
> JZ4725B SoC from Ingenic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>

> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt       | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
> index f936b5589b19..7cce6d761f2d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ controller in Ingenic JZ4780
>  
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible: Should be set to one of:
> +    "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc" (JZ4725B)
>      "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" (JZ4780)
>  - reg: Should specify the NEMC controller registers location and length.
>  - clocks: Clock for the NEMC controller.

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: jz4780-nemc: Add compatible string for JZ4725B

[Paul Cercueil]

The jz4780-nemc driver was modified to be compatible with the JZ4725B
SoC.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
---
 .../bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt          | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
index f936b5589b19..7cce6d761f2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ controller in Ingenic JZ4780
 
 Required properties:
 - compatible: Should be set to one of:
+    "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc" (JZ4725B)
     "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" (JZ4780)
 - reg: Should specify the NEMC controller registers location and length.
 - clocks: Clock for the NEMC controller.
-- 
2.18.0

[PATCH 4/4] memory: jz4780_nemc: Add support for the JZ4725B

[Paul Cercueil]

The NEMC module in the JZ4725B is very similar to the one in the JZ4780.
The only difference I could spot was that the TAS/TAH timings are
limited to 7 clock ticks on the JZ4725B instead of 15 on the JZ4780.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
---
 drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
index ef3f20e46590..c52d254988dc 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c
@@ -44,9 +44,14 @@
 #define NEMC_NFCSR_NFCEn(n)	BIT((((n) - 1) << 1) + 1)
 #define NEMC_NFCSR_TNFEn(n)	BIT(16 + (n) - 1)
 
+struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info {
+	uint8_t tas_tah_cycles_max;
+};
+
 struct jz4780_nemc {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct device *dev;
+	const struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info *soc_info;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	uint32_t clk_period;
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAS", &val) == 0) {
 		smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAS_MASK;
 		cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
-		if (cycles > 15) {
+		if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
 			dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAS %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
 				val, cycles);
 			return false;
@@ -214,7 +219,7 @@ static bool jz4780_nemc_configure_bank(struct jz4780_nemc *nemc,
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ingenic,nemc-tAH", &val) == 0) {
 		smcr &= ~NEMC_SMCR_TAH_MASK;
 		cycles = jz4780_nemc_ns_to_cycles(nemc, val);
-		if (cycles > 15) {
+		if (cycles > nemc->soc_info->tas_tah_cycles_max) {
 			dev_err(nemc->dev, "tAH %u is too high (%u cycles)\n",
 				val, cycles);
 			return false;
@@ -278,6 +283,10 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!nemc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	nemc->soc_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!nemc->soc_info)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	spin_lock_init(&nemc->lock);
 	nemc->dev = dev;
 
@@ -370,8 +379,17 @@ static int jz4780_nemc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info jz4725b_soc_info = {
+	.tas_tah_cycles_max = 7,
+};
+
+static const struct jz4780_nemc_soc_info jz4780_soc_info = {
+	.tas_tah_cycles_max = 15,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id jz4780_nemc_dt_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc" },
+	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-nemc", .data = &jz4725b_soc_info, },
+	{ .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nemc", .data = &jz4780_soc_info, },
 	{},
 };
 
-- 
2.18.0