From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: don't try to map blocks beyond i_size in writeback
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:07:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201160733.GA6532@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190201124641.GA40798@bfoster>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 07:46:42AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something where this code is required for correctness
> or somehow provides a measureable performance benefit, I think we're
> better off keeping this path as simple as possible. It should be fairly
> easy to provide test coverage for the page granularity truncate handling
> code (generic/524 may already cover this). I'm not so sure about that
> for the block granularity handling without having some kind of
> additional instrumentation.
It should not be required for correctness. I've done a first round
of testing with the check removed and it seems to be doing fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 7:55 make delalloc conversion more robust and clear Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] FOLD: improve xfs_bmapi_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:09 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 12:46 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove the io_type field from the writeback context and ioend Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:10 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: remove the s_maxbytes checks in xfs_map_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:10 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: don't try to map blocks beyond i_size in writeback Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:11 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 12:46 ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: simplify the xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents calling conventions Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:11 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: factor out two helpers from xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:28 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: split XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC handling " Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:28 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: move transaction handling to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:28 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: move stat accounting " Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:29 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: move xfs_iomap_write_allocate to xfs_aops.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:31 ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31 7:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: retry COW fork delalloc conversion when no extent was found Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190201160733.GA6532@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.