All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] FOLD: improve xfs_bmapi_delalloc
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:08:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201160840.GB6532@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190201124655.GB40798@bfoster>

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 07:46:56AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Ok, I see. Hmm.. I'm wondering how accurate the ->total value is in the
> delalloc conversion path. IIUC, the purpose is to try and select an AG
> with enough blocks for the allocation along with the indirect blocks to
> insert into the bmbt. Both of those have been reserved at delalloc res
> time, hence not needed in the tx. The AG selection code uses the max of
> total and the allocation request size, which means that for most
> conversions (> maxlevels) total is a no-op. Shouldn't total reflect the
> full size of the allocation (alloc size + maxlevels) regardless of
> whether the blocks were already "globally reserved?" Note that this is
> existing code and probably not something I would change in this series..

I think the total value in this path is completely bogus.  A while
ago I had a series trying to sort out some of these reservation
issues, but it will take a fair amount of work to get back to that.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-01 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-31  7:55 make delalloc conversion more robust and clear Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] FOLD: improve xfs_bmapi_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:09   ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01  7:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01  7:28       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 12:46         ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 16:08           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove the io_type field from the writeback context and ioend Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:10   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: remove the s_maxbytes checks in xfs_map_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:10   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: don't try to map blocks beyond i_size in writeback Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:11   ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01  7:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-01 12:46       ` Brian Foster
2019-02-01 16:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: simplify the xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents calling conventions Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:11   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: factor out two helpers from xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 18:28   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: split XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC handling " Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:28   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: move transaction handling to xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:28   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: move stat accounting " Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:29   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: move xfs_iomap_write_allocate to xfs_aops.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-31 19:31   ` Brian Foster
2019-01-31  7:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: retry COW fork delalloc conversion when no extent was found Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190201160840.GB6532@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.