All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: Fix a limit test in meson_nfc_select_chip()
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:38:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190205153841.GI2581@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205140818.2de31843@xps13>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:08:18PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > -	if (chip < 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(chip > MAX_CE_NUM))
> > +	if (chip < 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(chip >= meson_chip->nsels))
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	nfc->param.chip_select = meson_chip->sels[chip] ? NAND_CE1 : NAND_CE0;
> 
> I am gonna fold this three patches if this is fine for you with the
> original patch adding the driver which is currently in my next branch.

No problem.

regards,
dan carpenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: Fix a limit test in meson_nfc_select_chip()
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:38:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190205153841.GI2581@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205140818.2de31843@xps13>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:08:18PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > -	if (chip < 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(chip > MAX_CE_NUM))
> > +	if (chip < 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(chip >= meson_chip->nsels))
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	nfc->param.chip_select = meson_chip->sels[chip] ? NAND_CE1 : NAND_CE0;
> 
> I am gonna fold this three patches if this is fine for you with the
> original patch adding the driver which is currently in my next branch.

No problem.

regards,
dan carpenter


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: Fix a limit test in meson_nfc_select_chip()
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:38:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190205153841.GI2581@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205140818.2de31843@xps13>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:08:18PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > -	if (chip < 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(chip > MAX_CE_NUM))
> > +	if (chip < 0 || WARN_ON_ONCE(chip >= meson_chip->nsels))
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	nfc->param.chip_select = meson_chip->sels[chip] ? NAND_CE1 : NAND_CE0;
> 
> I am gonna fold this three patches if this is fine for you with the
> original patch adding the driver which is currently in my next branch.

No problem.

regards,
dan carpenter


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-05 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-01  8:29 [PATCH 1/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: Fix a limit test in meson_nfc_select_chip() Dan Carpenter
2019-02-01  8:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-01  8:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-02  3:01 ` Liang Yang
2019-02-02  3:01   ` Liang Yang
2019-02-02  3:01   ` Liang Yang
2019-02-05 13:08 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-05 13:08   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-05 13:08   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-05 15:38   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-02-05 15:38     ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-05 15:38     ` Dan Carpenter
2019-02-05 19:07 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-05 19:07   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-05 19:07   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190205153841.GI2581@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=liang.yang@amlogic.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.