All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:55:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211105537.GA59133@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211105214.GA30880@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>


* Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Sounds good to me - I've merged this patch, will push it out after 
> > > testing.
> > 
> > Based on Peter's feedback I'm delaying this - performance testing on at 
> > least one key ll/sc arch would be nice indeed.
> 
> Once Waiman has posted a new version, I can take it for a spin on some
> arm64 boxen if he shares his workload.

Cool, thanks!

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:55:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211105537.GA59133@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211105214.GA30880@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>


* Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Sounds good to me - I've merged this patch, will push it out after 
> > > testing.
> > 
> > Based on Peter's feedback I'm delaying this - performance testing on at 
> > least one key ll/sc arch would be nice indeed.
> 
> Once Waiman has posted a new version, I can take it for a spin on some
> arm64 boxen if he shares his workload.

Cool, thanks!

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:55:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211105537.GA59133@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211105214.GA30880@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>


* Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Sounds good to me - I've merged this patch, will push it out after 
> > > testing.
> > 
> > Based on Peter's feedback I'm delaying this - performance testing on at 
> > least one key ll/sc arch would be nice indeed.
> 
> Once Waiman has posted a new version, I can take it for a spin on some
> arm64 boxen if he shares his workload.

Cool, thanks!

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:55:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211105537.GA59133@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211105214.GA30880@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>


* Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Sounds good to me - I've merged this patch, will push it out after 
> > > testing.
> > 
> > Based on Peter's feedback I'm delaying this - performance testing on at 
> > least one key ll/sc arch would be nice indeed.
> 
> Once Waiman has posted a new version, I can take it for a spin on some
> arm64 boxen if he shares his workload.

Cool, thanks!

	Ingo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-11  2:00 [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:00 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:00 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:00 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:08 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:08   ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:08   ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  2:08   ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  7:11   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11  7:11     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11  7:11     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11  7:11     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:52       ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 10:52         ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 10:52         ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 10:55         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-02-11 10:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 10:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 13:32       ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 13:32         ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 13:32         ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 13:32         ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11  9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11  9:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 10:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 10:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 10:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 10:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 16:35   ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 16:35     ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 16:35     ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 16:35     ` Waiman Long
2019-02-11 17:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 17:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 17:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-11 17:04       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190211105537.GA59133@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.