All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	b-ak <anur.bhargav@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] tlv320aic32x4: delay i2c access by 1 ms after hardware reset
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:04:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211150425.GE22391@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190210154519.2506-1-ps.report@gmx.net>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 04:45:19PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote:

> @@ -972,6 +972,8 @@ static int aic32x4_component_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>  		gpio_set_value(aic32x4->rstn_gpio, 1);
>  	}
>  
> +	mdelay(1);
> +

Perhaps only do this if we toggled the GPIO?  If the device wasn't in
reset then there's no need to wait.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	b-ak <anur.bhargav@gmail.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] tlv320aic32x4: delay i2c access by 1 ms after hardware reset
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:04:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211150425.GE22391@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190210154519.2506-1-ps.report@gmx.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 04:45:19PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote:

> @@ -972,6 +972,8 @@ static int aic32x4_component_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>  		gpio_set_value(aic32x4->rstn_gpio, 1);
>  	}
>  
> +	mdelay(1);
> +

Perhaps only do this if we toggled the GPIO?  If the device wasn't in
reset then there's no need to wait.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-10 15:45 [RFC v1] tlv320aic32x4: delay i2c access by 1 ms after hardware reset Peter Seiderer
2019-02-11 15:04 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2019-02-11 15:04   ` Mark Brown
2019-02-11 21:02   ` Peter Seiderer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190211150425.GE22391@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=anur.bhargav@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ps.report@gmx.net \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.