All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Consider subtrees in memory.events
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:01:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211190115.GC13953@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208224419.GA24772@chrisdown.name>

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:44:19PM +0000, Chris Down wrote:
> memory.stat and other files already consider subtrees in their output,
> and we should too in order to not present an inconsistent interface.
> 
> The current situation is fairly confusing, because people interacting
> with cgroups expect hierarchical behaviour in the vein of memory.stat,
> cgroup.events, and other files. For example, this causes confusion when
> debugging reclaim events under low, as currently these always read "0"
> at non-leaf memcg nodes, which frequently causes people to misdiagnose
> breach behaviour. The same confusion applies to other counters in this
> file when debugging issues.
> 
> Aggregation is done at write time instead of at read-time since these
> counters aren't hot (unlike memory.stat which is per-page, so it does it
> at read time), and it makes sense to bundle this with the file
> notifications.
> 
> After this patch, events are propagated up the hierarchy:
> 
>     [root@ktst ~]# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/memory.events
>     low 0
>     high 0
>     max 0
>     oom 0
>     oom_kill 0
>     [root@ktst ~]# systemd-run -p MemoryMax=1 true
>     Running as unit: run-r251162a189fb4562b9dabfdc9b0422f5.service
>     [root@ktst ~]# cat /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/memory.events
>     low 0
>     high 0
>     max 7
>     oom 1
>     oom_kill 1
> 
> As this is a change in behaviour, this can be reverted to the old
> behaviour by mounting with the `memory_localevents` flag set. However,
> we use the new behaviour by default as there's a lack of evidence that
> there are any current users of memory.events that would find this change
> undesirable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: kernel-team@fb.com

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-23 22:31 [PATCH 2/2] mm: Consider subtrees in memory.events Chris Down
2019-01-24  0:24 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-01-24  1:03   ` Chris Down
2019-01-24  8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 15:21   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-24 15:51     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 16:00   ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-24 17:01     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 18:23       ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-25  8:42         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 16:51           ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-25 17:37             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 17:37               ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 18:28               ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 12:51                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 14:28                   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 14:52                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 14:54                       ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 15:18                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 15:41                           ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 17:05                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-28 17:49                               ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-29 14:43                                 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-29 14:52                                   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-30 16:50                                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 17:06                                       ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-30 17:41                                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 17:52                                           ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-30 18:16                                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 19:11                                         ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-30 19:27                                           ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-30 19:30                                             ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-30 19:37                                               ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-30 19:23                   ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-30 20:05                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-30 21:31                       ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-31  8:58                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-31 16:22                           ` Johannes Weiner
2019-02-01 10:27                             ` Michal Hocko
2019-02-01 16:34                               ` Johannes Weiner
2019-01-28 15:59                 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-28 16:05                   ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 16:08                     ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-28 16:12                       ` Tejun Heo
2019-01-28 14:30 ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-08 22:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Rename ambiguously named memory.stat counters and functions Chris Down
2019-02-08 22:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Consider subtrees in memory.events Chris Down
2019-02-11 19:01     ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2019-02-11 18:55   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Rename ambiguously named memory.stat counters and functions Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190211190115.GC13953@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.