All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] protocol-capabilities.txt: document symref
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:32:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220003248.GA160251@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214035602.GA7209@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On 2019.02.13 22:56, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:41:28PM -0800, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> 
> > ---
> > Range-diff against v1:
> > 1:  4ffb11ff77 ! 1:  cb1b2834b7 protocol-capabilities.txt: document symref
> >     @@ -12,6 +12,17 @@
> >       diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt b/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
> >       --- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
> >       +++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt
> >     +@@
> >     + Git Protocol Capabilities
> >     + =========================
> >     + 
> >     ++NOTE: this document describes capabilities for versions 0 and 1 of the pack
> >     ++protocol. For version 2, please refer to the link:protocol-v2.html[protocol-v2]
> >     ++doc.
> >     ++
> >     + Servers SHOULD support all capabilities defined in this document.
> >     + 
> >     + On the very first line of the initial server response of either
> 
> I think this makes sense. I wondered to what degree the v2 protocol doc
> may say "...and you can use capabilities from protocol-capabilities.txt
> here". But it doesn't. It newly lists the capabilities, which makes this
> paragraph the right thing to say.
> 
> It does mean that if we teach v1 a new capability, we'll have to
> document it in both places. But moving forward, we'd hopefully not be
> doing that too often (I haven't seen talk of flipping the v2 switch yet
> by default, but obviously that's where we want to end up).
> 
> I probably would have put this in its own patch, but barring that we
> should probably at least mention in the commit message what this
> paragraph is doing here.
> 
> -Peff

Done in V3. Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-20  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-11 23:52 [PATCH] protocol-capabilities.txt: document symref Josh Steadmon
2019-02-11 23:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-02-12  0:05 ` Jeff King
2019-02-12  0:07   ` Josh Steadmon
2019-02-13 23:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Steadmon
2019-02-14  3:56   ` Jeff King
2019-02-20  0:32     ` Josh Steadmon [this message]
2019-02-21 17:38       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-20  0:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Josh Steadmon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190220003248.GA160251@google.com \
    --to=steadmon@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.