From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: microchip: add MIB counter reading support
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:34:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225183453.GA9243@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cf3bf259bed9e44bd7e885850e45cb3a62e3779.camel@perches.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1044 bytes --]
On Wed 2019-02-20 15:49:25, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 19:51 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On February 12, 2019 6:39:49 PM PST, Tristram.Ha@microchip.com wrote:
> > > > > +static void ksz9477_freeze_mib(struct ksz_device *dev, int port,
> > > > > + bool freeze)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct ksz_port *p = &dev->ports[port];
> > > > > + u32 val = freeze ? MIB_COUNTER_FLUSH_FREEZE : 0;
> > > >
> > > > Reverse Christmas tree.
> > >
> > > There was a checkpatch.pl patch in 2016 that tried to check this, but
> > > it was never accepted?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732076/
>
> While I still think use of reverse christmas tree is misguided,
> there were some disagreements about what form it really is:
Agreed about "misguided".
Often there's more logical order, like "self" pointer first... which
this patch follows.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-25 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 4:07 [PATCH v1 net-next 0/4] net: dsa: microchip: add MIB counters support Tristram.Ha
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 1/4] net: dsa: microchip: prepare PHY for proper advertisement Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 16:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: microchip: add MIB counter reading support Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 17:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-13 2:39 ` Tristram.Ha
2019-02-13 3:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-13 3:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-14 19:26 ` Tristram.Ha
2019-02-14 19:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-02-20 23:49 ` Joe Perches
2019-02-25 18:34 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 3/4] net: dsa: microchip: use readx_poll_time for polling Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-02-13 2:53 ` Tristram.Ha
2019-02-08 4:07 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 4/4] net: dsa: microchip: remove unnecessary include headers Tristram.Ha
2019-02-09 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190225183453.GA9243@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.