From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>, Bai Ping <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx8mq: Add support for the CLKO1 clock
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:15:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228021509.GA26041@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155078140414.77512.3157214123340597508@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:36:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Fabio Estevam (2019-01-30 16:20:56)
> > Add the entry for the CLKO1 clock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> Applied to clk-next but I had to fix the whole DT binding number because
> I don't know what this patch is based on. In fact, please get everyone
> involved at NXP and whoever else is working on i.MX clk drivers to
> coordinate somehow. I just spent 20 minutes working through the set of
> imx patches in my inbox and I see approximately 6 different authors all
> sending out a few clks at a time for the same drivers with zero
> information about what the patches are based on or what order they're
> supposed to be applied in.
>
> If someone wants to collect all the patches and indicate on the list
> they've picked them up and will be sending them as a pull request that's
> fine.
I will help collect the i.MX platform clock patches and send you as
pull request.
Shawn
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>,
Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>,
linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Bai Ping <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx8mq: Add support for the CLKO1 clock
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:15:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228021509.GA26041@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155078140414.77512.3157214123340597508@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:36:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Fabio Estevam (2019-01-30 16:20:56)
> > Add the entry for the CLKO1 clock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> Applied to clk-next but I had to fix the whole DT binding number because
> I don't know what this patch is based on. In fact, please get everyone
> involved at NXP and whoever else is working on i.MX clk drivers to
> coordinate somehow. I just spent 20 minutes working through the set of
> imx patches in my inbox and I see approximately 6 different authors all
> sending out a few clks at a time for the same drivers with zero
> information about what the patches are based on or what order they're
> supposed to be applied in.
>
> If someone wants to collect all the patches and indicate on the list
> they've picked them up and will be sending them as a pull request that's
> fine.
I will help collect the i.MX platform clock patches and send you as
pull request.
Shawn
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 0:20 [PATCH] clk: imx8mq: Add support for the CLKO1 clock Fabio Estevam
2019-01-31 0:20 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-01-31 7:33 ` Abel Vesa
2019-01-31 7:33 ` Abel Vesa
2019-02-21 20:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-02-21 20:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-02-22 1:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-02-22 1:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-02-22 4:43 ` Aisheng Dong
2019-02-22 4:43 ` Aisheng Dong
2019-02-28 2:15 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2019-02-28 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2019-02-28 18:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-02-28 18:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-03-01 2:01 ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-01 2:01 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190228021509.GA26041@dragon \
--to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
--cc=ccaione@baylibre.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.