Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] numa: deprecate 'mem' parameter of '-numa node' option

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 02:55:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:11:19 +0100
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 01/03/2019 18.48, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > [...]
> > > So I think this patch has to be dropped & replaced with one that
> > > simply documents that memdev syntax is preferred.  
> > 
> > That's definitely not enough. I've had a couple of cases already where
> > we documented that certain options should not be used anymore, and
> > people simply ignored it (aka. if it ain't broken, don't do any change).
> > Then they just started to complain when I really tried to remove the
> > option after the deprecation period.
> 
> > So Igor, if you can not officially deprecate these things here yet, you
> > should at least make sure that they can not be used with new machine
> > types anymore. Then, after a couple of years, when we feel sure that
> > there are only some few or no people left who still use it with the old
> > machine types, we can start to discuss the deprecation process again, I
> > think.
> Is it acceptable to silently disable CLI options (even if they are broken
> like in this case) for new machine types?
> I was under impression that it should go through deprecation first.

Yes, it must go through deprecation. I was saying we can't disable
the CLI options at all, until there is a way for libvirt to correctly
use the new options.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|