* leaking mutex and a deadlock in brcmfmac
@ 2019-03-04 14:55 Piotr Figiel
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Piotr Figiel @ 2019-03-04 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, franky.lin@broadcom.com,
hante.meuleman@broadcom.com, chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com,
wright.feng@cypress.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org,
davem@davemloft.net, brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com
Hi,
I noticed the kernel reports a leaking mutex BUG and a deadlock in brcmfmac
driver.
The issue is observable when the Raspberry Pi WiFi USB dongle is plugged in
and the kernel has following options enabled (step 12 from the
submit-checklist.rst): CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, CONFIG_PROVE_RCU and
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD.
I'm pretty sure the deadlock can manifest itself in practice as I observed
once an issue that if the dongle is disconnected shortly after connection
the USB stack stopped responding to connect/disconnect events. I wasn't able
to reproduce it but I gathered the stack traces via sysrq and noticed the
usb workqueue was waiting in disconnect on that leaked mutex
(dev_init_lock).
Is this maybe a known problem or could you provide some hints how to tackle
it? The critical section protected by the leaking mutex seems pretty huge
and I couldn't find any straightforward approach to fix this.
Here are the logs when reprodicing this on recent wireless-drivers-next
master:
usb 1-1.3.1.1: new high-speed USB device number 9 using ci_hdrc
brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43143 for chip BCM43143/2
usbcore: registered new interface driver brcmfmac
BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: kworker/1:1/0x00000000/135
last function: brcmf_driver_register [brcmfmac]
1 lock held by kworker/1:1/135:
#0: 68d3f0a3 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x570 [brcmfmac]
CPU: 1 PID: 135 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7-00073-g837ea0d #112
Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
Workqueue: events brcmf_driver_register [brcmfmac]
[<80111c1c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d0e8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<8010d0e8>] (show_stack) from [<809e64ac>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4)
[<809e64ac>] (dump_stack) from [<801417d8>] (process_one_work+0x718/0x810)
[<801417d8>] (process_one_work) from [<801418fc>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564)
[<801418fc>] (worker_thread) from [<80147a80>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c)
[<80147a80>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
Exception stack(0xede63fb0 to 0xede63ff8)
3fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
3fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
3fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.0.0-rc7-00073-g837ea0d #112 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/1:1/135 is trying to acquire lock:
38feea71 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x174/0x810
but task is already holding lock:
68d3f0a3 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x570 [brcmfmac]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}:
mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x570 [brcmfmac]
usb_probe_interface+0xc0/0x1bc
really_probe+0x214/0x2dc
__driver_attach+0xe4/0xe8
bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4
bus_add_driver+0x19c/0x214
driver_register+0x78/0x110
usb_register_driver+0x84/0x148
brcmf_usb_register+0x20/0x54 [brcmfmac]
process_one_work+0x228/0x810
worker_thread+0x2c/0x564
kthread+0x13c/0x16c
ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
(null)
-> #1 (brcmf_driver_work){+.+.}:
worker_thread+0x2c/0x564
kthread+0x13c/0x16c
ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
(null)
-> #0 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}:
process_one_work+0x1b8/0x810
worker_thread+0x2c/0x564
kthread+0x13c/0x16c
ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
(null)
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
(wq_completion)"events" --> brcmf_driver_work --> &devinfo->dev_init_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock);
lock(brcmf_driver_work);
lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock);
lock((wq_completion)"events");
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by kworker/1:1/135:
#0: 68d3f0a3 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x570 [brcmfmac]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 135 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7-00073-g837ea0d #112
Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func
[<80111c1c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d0e8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<8010d0e8>] (show_stack) from [<809e64ac>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4)
[<809e64ac>] (dump_stack) from [<8017352c>] (print_circular_bug+0x210/0x330)
[<8017352c>] (print_circular_bug) from [<801762cc>] (__lock_acquire+0x12b0/0x1a04)
[<801762cc>] (__lock_acquire) from [<80177448>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x268)
[<80177448>] (lock_acquire) from [<80141278>] (process_one_work+0x1b8/0x810)
[<80141278>] (process_one_work) from [<801418fc>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564)
[<801418fc>] (worker_thread) from [<80147a80>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c)
[<80147a80>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
Exception stack(0xede63fb0 to 0xede63ff8)
3fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
3fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
3fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43143 for chip BCM43143/2
brcmfmac: brcmf_c_process_clm_blob: no clm_blob available (err=-2), device may have limited channels available
brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware: BCM43143/2 wl0: Apr 3 2014 04:43:32 version 6.10.198.66 (r467479) FWID 01-32bd010e
ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_inetaddr_changed: fail to get arp ip table err:-52
IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
Best regards,
Piotr Figiel
PS. when replying please keep in To:/CC: as I'm not subscribed to the list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-03-04 14:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-04 14:55 leaking mutex and a deadlock in brcmfmac Piotr Figiel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.