From: Dale B Stimson <dale.b.stimson@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 1/1] gem_ctx_isolation.c - Gen11 enabling for context isolation test
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 12:46:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190305204650.GA31562@dbstims-dev.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155181244896.27405.4364461164560538316@skylake-alporthouse-com>
CS_CHICKEN1 is not privileged anymore (as of Gen11), as evidenced
by its absence from the kernel whitelist for Gen11 combined with the
successful execution on ICL of the tests added by your recent patch
"i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Sanitycheck nonpriv access".
-Dale
On 2019-03-05 19:00:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Dale B Stimson (2019-03-05 01:03:08)
> > @@ -132,30 +136,49 @@ static const struct named_register {
> > { "PERF_CNT_1", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91b8, 2 },
> > { "PERF_CNT_2", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91c0, 2 },
> >
> > + { "CTX_PREEMPT", NOCTX /* GEN10 */, RCS0, 0x2248 },
> > + { "CS_CHICKEN1", GEN11, RCS0, 0x2580, .masked = true },
>
> CS_CHICKEN1 is still privileged? At least I'm push a patch to add it to
> the whitelist for gen11.
> -Chris
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dale B Stimson <dale.b.stimson@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4 1/1] gem_ctx_isolation.c - Gen11 enabling for context isolation test
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 12:46:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190305204650.GA31562@dbstims-dev.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155181244896.27405.4364461164560538316@skylake-alporthouse-com>
CS_CHICKEN1 is not privileged anymore (as of Gen11), as evidenced
by its absence from the kernel whitelist for Gen11 combined with the
successful execution on ICL of the tests added by your recent patch
"i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Sanitycheck nonpriv access".
-Dale
On 2019-03-05 19:00:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Dale B Stimson (2019-03-05 01:03:08)
> > @@ -132,30 +136,49 @@ static const struct named_register {
> > { "PERF_CNT_1", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91b8, 2 },
> > { "PERF_CNT_2", NOCTX, RCS0, 0x91c0, 2 },
> >
> > + { "CTX_PREEMPT", NOCTX /* GEN10 */, RCS0, 0x2248 },
> > + { "CS_CHICKEN1", GEN11, RCS0, 0x2580, .masked = true },
>
> CS_CHICKEN1 is still privileged? At least I'm push a patch to add it to
> the whitelist for gen11.
> -Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-05 1:03 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 0/1] gem_ctx_isolation.c - Gen11 enabling for context isolation test Dale B Stimson
2019-03-05 1:03 ` Dale B Stimson
2019-03-05 1:03 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 1/1] " Dale B Stimson
2019-03-05 1:03 ` Dale B Stimson
2019-03-05 19:00 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2019-03-05 19:00 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-05 20:46 ` Dale B Stimson [this message]
2019-03-05 20:46 ` Dale B Stimson
2019-03-05 20:56 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2019-03-05 20:56 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-05 2:13 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for gem_ctx_isolation.c - Gen11 enabling for context isolation test (rev5) Patchwork
2019-03-05 6:35 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-05 15:31 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v4 0/1] gem_ctx_isolation.c - Gen11 enabling for context isolation test Chris Wilson
2019-03-05 15:31 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190305204650.GA31562@dbstims-dev.fm.intel.com \
--to=dale.b.stimson@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.