All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, lersek@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com,
	kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2019 10:37:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307093723.655-3-armbru@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307093723.655-1-armbru@redhat.com>

From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

We reject undersized images.  As of the previous commit, even with a
decent error message.  Still, this is a potentially confusing
stumbling block when you move from using -bios to using -drive
if=pflash,file=blob,format=raw,readonly for loading your firmware
code. To mitigate that we automatically pad in the read-only case and
warn the user when we have performed magic to enable things to Just
Work (tm).

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
 hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
index 75ce8ef489..00980316dc 100644
--- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
+++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
@@ -759,8 +759,9 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     if (pfl->blk) {
         /*
          * Validate the backing store is the right size for pflash
-         * devices. If the user supplies a larger file we ignore the
-         * tail.
+         * devices. If the device is read-only we can elide the check
+         * and just pad the region first. If the user supplies a
+         * larger file we ignore the tail.
          */
         int64_t backing_len = blk_getlength(pfl->blk);
         if (backing_len < 0) {
@@ -769,10 +770,21 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         }
 
         if (backing_len < total_len) {
-            error_setg(errp, "device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, "
-                       "backing file provides only %" PRIu64 " bytes",
-                       total_len, backing_len);
-            return;
+            if (pfl->ro) {
+                size_t pad_bytes = total_len - backing_len;
+                /* pad with NOR erase pattern */
+                memset((uint8_t *)pfl->storage + backing_len,
+                       0xff, pad_bytes);
+                warn_report("device needs %" PRIu64
+                            " bytes, padded with %zu 0xff bytes",
+                            total_len, pad_bytes);
+                total_len = backing_len;
+            } else {
+                error_setg(errp, "device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, "
+                           "backing file provides only %" PRIu64 " bytes",
+                           total_len, backing_len);
+                return;
+            }
         } else if (backing_len > total_len) {
             warn_report("device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, rest ignored",
                         total_len);
-- 
2.17.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-07  9:37 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] " Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 15:05   ` Alex Bennée
2019-03-07 17:14     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:37 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-03-07 10:05   ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 14:55     ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-07 17:55       ` Eric Blake
2019-03-07 17:57       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 18:01     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-07  9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] fixup! hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] fixup! hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190307093723.655-3-armbru@redhat.com \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.