From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, lersek@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 18:14:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mum6ppxi.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pnr2g1wv.fsf@zen.linaroharston> ("Alex Bennée"'s message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:05:52 +0000")
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> It looks like there was going to be code to check we had some sort of
>> alignment so let's replace it with an actual check. Reject undersized
>> images with "device needs N bytes, backing file provides only M
>> bytes". This is a bit more useful than the enigmatic "failed to read
>> the initial flash content" when we attempt to read the number of bytes
>> the device should have. Continue to accept oversized images, but warn
>> "device needs N bytes, rest ignored".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
>> index 9d1c356eb6..75ce8ef489 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>> #include "qemu/bitops.h"
>> #include "qemu/host-utils.h"
>> #include "qemu/log.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> #include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>> #include "trace.h"
>> @@ -730,13 +731,6 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> }
>> device_len = sector_len_per_device * blocks_per_device;
>>
>> - /* XXX: to be fixed */
>> -#if 0
>> - if (total_len != (8 * 1024 * 1024) && total_len != (16 * 1024 * 1024) &&
>> - total_len != (32 * 1024 * 1024) && total_len != (64 * 1024 * 1024))
>> - return NULL;
>> -#endif
>> -
>> memory_region_init_rom_device(
>> &pfl->mem, OBJECT(dev),
>> &pflash_cfi01_ops,
>> @@ -763,6 +757,27 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> }
>>
>> if (pfl->blk) {
>> + /*
>> + * Validate the backing store is the right size for pflash
>> + * devices. If the user supplies a larger file we ignore the
>> + * tail.
>> + */
>> + int64_t backing_len = blk_getlength(pfl->blk);
>> + if (backing_len < 0) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "unable to check size of backing file");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (backing_len < total_len) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, "
>> + "backing file provides only %" PRIu64 " bytes",
>> + total_len, backing_len);
>> + return;
>> + } else if (backing_len > total_len) {
>> + warn_report("device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, rest ignored",
>> + total_len);
>> + }
>
> As discussed elsewhere I'm happy for this just to error out with a
> useful error message.
I'll do that in the next spin. Thanks!
>> +
>> /* read the initial flash content */
>> ret = blk_pread(pfl->blk, 0, pfl->storage, total_len);
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-07 9:37 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] " Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 15:05 ` Alex Bennée
2019-03-07 17:14 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-03-07 9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 10:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 14:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-07 17:55 ` Eric Blake
2019-03-07 17:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 18:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-07 9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] fixup! hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] fixup! hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 9:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mum6ppxi.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.