All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:31:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312153124.6e6f3919.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301093902.27799-1-cohuck@redhat.com>

On Fri,  1 Mar 2019 10:38:56 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> [This is the Linux kernel part, git tree is available at
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw.git vfio-ccw-eagain-caps-v3

Obviously, that should have been -v4 /o\

In the meanwhile, I have rebased this on top of my vfio-ccw branch with
the factored-out non-final interrupt handling and pushed that out to
vfio-ccw-eagain-v4.5. The only changes are in patch 2 (removed
non-final interrupt handling from the patch and its description); Eric:
I've kept your r-b.

> 
> The companion QEMU patches are available at
> https://github.com/cohuck/qemu vfio-ccw-caps]
> 
> Currently, vfio-ccw only relays START SUBCHANNEL requests to the real
> device. This tends to work well for the most common 'good path' scenarios;
> however, as we emulate {HALT,CLEAR} SUBCHANNEL in QEMU, things like
> clearing pending requests at the device is currently not supported.
> This may be a problem for e.g. error recovery.
> 
> This patch series introduces capabilities (similar to what vfio-pci uses)
> and exposes a new async region for handling hsch/csch.
> 
> Lightly tested (I can interact with a dasd as before, and reserve/release
> seems to work well.) Not sure if there is a better way to test this, ideas
> welcome.
> 
> Changes v3->v4:
> - shrunk the capability offset, we don't need to accommodate as much as pci
> - make checks in patch 1 more consistent and less buggy
> - rebased on top of my current vfio-ccw branch
> 
> Changes v2->v3:
> - Unb0rked patch 1, improved scope
> - Split out the new mutex from patch 2 into new patch 3; added missing
>   locking and hopefully improved description
> - Patch 2 now reworks the state handling by splitting the BUSY state
>   into CP_PROCESSING and CP_PENDING
> - Patches 3 and 5 adapted on top of the reworked patches; hsch/csch
>   are allowed in CP_PENDING, but not in CP_PROCESSING (did not add
>   any R-b due to that)
> - Added missing free in patch 5
> - Probably some small changes I forgot to note down
> 
> Changes v1->v2:
> - New patch 1: make it safe to use the cp accessors at any time; this
>   should avoid problems with unsolicited interrupt handling
> - New patch 2: handle concurrent accesses to the io region; the idea is
>   to return -EAGAIN to userspace more often (so it can simply retry)
> - also handle concurrent accesses to the async io region
> - change VFIO_REGION_TYPE_CCW
> - merge events for halt and clear to a single async event; this turned out
>   to make the code quite a bit simpler
> - probably some small changes I forgot to note down
> 
> Cornelia Huck (6):
>   vfio-ccw: make it safe to access channel programs
>   vfio-ccw: rework ssch state handling
>   vfio-ccw: protect the I/O region
>   vfio-ccw: add capabilities chain
>   s390/cio: export hsch to modules
>   vfio-ccw: add handling for async channel instructions
> 
>  drivers/s390/cio/Makefile           |   3 +-
>  drivers/s390/cio/ioasm.c            |   1 +
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_async.c   |  88 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c      |  21 ++-
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h      |   2 +
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c     |  57 ++++++--
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c     | 143 +++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c     | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h |  48 ++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h           |   4 +
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h       |  12 ++
>  11 files changed, 537 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_async.c
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-12 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-01  9:38 [PATCH v4 0/6] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part) Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] vfio-ccw: make it safe to access channel programs Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-08 17:02   ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 17:02     ` [Qemu-devel] " Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 17:02     ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 17:07     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-08 17:07       ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-08 17:07       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-08 17:19       ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 17:19         ` [Qemu-devel] " Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 17:19         ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 20:25       ` Eric Farman
2019-04-08 20:25         ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-04-08 20:25         ` Eric Farman
2019-04-09 23:34       ` Halil Pasic
2019-04-09 23:34         ` Halil Pasic
2019-04-11  2:59         ` Eric Farman
2019-04-11  2:59           ` Eric Farman
2019-04-11 15:58           ` [qemu-s390x] " Halil Pasic
2019-04-11 15:58             ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Halil Pasic
2019-04-11 15:58             ` Halil Pasic
2019-04-11 16:25             ` [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-04-11 16:25               ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Eric Farman
2019-04-11 16:25               ` Eric Farman
2019-04-11 16:36               ` [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-11 16:36                 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-11 16:36                 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-11 18:07                 ` [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] " Halil Pasic
2019-04-11 18:07                   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Halil Pasic
2019-04-11 18:07                   ` Halil Pasic
2019-04-11 21:27           ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-04-11 21:27             ` Eric Farman
2019-04-12  8:14             ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-12  8:14               ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] vfio-ccw: rework ssch state handling Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-03-08 22:18   ` Eric Farman
2019-03-08 22:18     ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-03-11  9:47     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-11  9:47       ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] vfio-ccw: protect the I/O region Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:38   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:39 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] vfio-ccw: add capabilities chain Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:39   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 14:40   ` Eric Farman
2019-04-15 14:40     ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-04-15 14:40     ` Eric Farman
2019-04-15 15:24   ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-15 15:24     ` [Qemu-devel] " Farhan Ali
2019-04-15 15:24     ` Farhan Ali
2019-03-01  9:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] s390/cio: export hsch to modules Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:39   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:39 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] vfio-ccw: add handling for async channel instructions Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01  9:39   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 14:56   ` Eric Farman
2019-04-15 14:56     ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-04-15 14:56     ` Eric Farman
2019-04-15 15:25   ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-15 15:25     ` [Qemu-devel] " Farhan Ali
2019-04-15 15:25     ` Farhan Ali
2019-03-07 21:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part) Eric Farman
2019-03-07 21:28   ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-03-12 14:31 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-04-15 11:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 11:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 11:51   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 16:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 16:43   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 16:43   ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190312153124.6e6f3919.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.