From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@l>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:05:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Porting a patch
> forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining
> of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now.
And that's exactly the reason why I think instead of removing warning on
checkpatch, it makes sense to convert to an error for a while. People are
tending read documentation on internet and thus might have outdated one. And
yes, the compiler doesn't tell a thing about it.
P.S. Though, if majority of people will tell that I'm wrong, then it's okay to
remove.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:05:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Porting a patch
> forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining
> of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now.
And that's exactly the reason why I think instead of removing warning on
checkpatch, it makes sense to convert to an error for a while. People are
tending read documentation on internet and thus might have outdated one. And
yes, the compiler doesn't tell a thing about it.
P.S. Though, if majority of people will tell that I'm wrong, then it's okay to
remove.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:05:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Porting a patch
> forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining
> of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now.
And that's exactly the reason why I think instead of removing warning on
checkpatch, it makes sense to convert to an error for a while. People are
tending read documentation on internet and thus might have outdated one. And
yes, the compiler doesn't tell a thing about it.
P.S. Though, if majority of people will tell that I'm wrong, then it's okay to
remove.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@l>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:05:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Porting a patch
> forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining
> of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now.
And that's exactly the reason why I think instead of removing warning on
checkpatch, it makes sense to convert to an error for a while. People are
tending read documentation on internet and thus might have outdated one. And
yes, the compiler doesn't tell a thing about it.
P.S. Though, if majority of people will tell that I'm wrong, then it's okay to
remove.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:05:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Porting a patch
> forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining
> of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now.
And that's exactly the reason why I think instead of removing warning on
checkpatch, it makes sense to convert to an error for a while. People are
tending read documentation on internet and thus might have outdated one. And
yes, the compiler doesn't tell a thing about it.
P.S. Though, if majority of people will tell that I'm wrong, then it's okay to
remove.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] treewide: Switch printk users from %pf and %pF to %ps and %pS, respectively Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] vsprintf: Remove support for %pF and %pf in favour of %pS and %ps Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <20190322132108.25501-1-sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] treewide: Switch printk users from %pf and %pF to %ps and %pS, respectively Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <20190322132108.25501-2-sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-22 14:30 ` David Sterba
2019-03-22 14:30 ` David Sterba
2019-03-22 14:30 ` David Sterba
2019-03-22 14:30 ` David Sterba
2019-03-22 14:30 ` David Sterba
2019-03-22 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-22 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-22 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-22 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-22 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-25 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:33 ` [Drbd-dev] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-22 14:30 ` David Sterba
2019-03-22 21:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-25 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-22 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] vsprintf: Remove support for %pF and %pf in favour of %pS and %ps Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:21 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-25 9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:30 ` [Drbd-dev] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <CAJZ5v0i8JiQGk25yZKQqTzCCY+nrfoKXOH8nM6eNPhkN-i+y9w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-25 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:49 ` [Drbd-dev] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-25 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-22 13:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-22 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-22 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-22 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdVmqqjVx7As9AAywYxYXG=grijF5rF77OBn6TUjM9+xKw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-22 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-22 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2019-03-22 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-22 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-22 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-22 17:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <20190322170550.GX9224-XvqNBM/wLWRrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-24 21:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 21:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 21:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 21:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 21:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 21:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <20190324211932.GK9224-XvqNBM/wLWRrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-25 15:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-25 15:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-25 15:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-25 15:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-25 15:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-25 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-25 15:13 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 21:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-22 13:21 Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@l \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.