From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] drm/atomic: integrate private objects with suspend/resume helpers
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190325090641.GF2665@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190315115607.v4avbfbp3hyytsl6@ti.com>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:56:07AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote on Fri [2019-Mar-15 11:50:57 +0100]:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 08:44:45AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > > During a suspend cycle the atomic state is saved to be used during the
> > > restore cycle.
> > >
> > > However the current state duplication logic does not duplicate private
> > > objects. This leads to state inconsistencies at resume time.
> > >
> > > With private objects modeset lock now integrated, we can make sure that
> > > private object state are properly saved and restored.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> >
> > Why do you need this? We're doing a full atomic_check, and your
> > atomic_check should be pulling in any private state objects and
> > recomputing their states. This smells like papering over a driver bug.
>
> I have not seen any atomic_check called during the suspend duplicate
> helper. And you are correct normally the private_object state in my case
> would get pulled in during a plane atomic_check but that does not happen
> here in this step.
Yeah duplicating in suspend won't call atomic_check. Restoring the
duplicated state on resume will (or there's going to be lots of broken
drivers).
> Why wouldn't we save all the "state" artifacts so that the whole atomic
> state is consistent?
It's not needed, and might possible paper over driver bugs ...
> > The duplicate helpers should only need to duplicate the uapi-relevant
> > states, i.e. connector/crtc/planes.
... because of this reason. If your driver can't recompute the private
state from just the duplicated uapi-relevant states it's broken. Because
essentially the exact same thing might happen through the atomic ioctl
from userspace.
Hence my question: Why do you need this?
-Daniel
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > > index 540a77a2ade9..b108021cc092 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > > @@ -3189,6 +3189,7 @@ drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > > struct drm_plane *plane;
> > > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > + struct drm_private_obj *privobj;
> > > int err = 0;
> > >
> > > state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
> > > @@ -3218,6 +3219,16 @@ drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + drm_for_each_privobj(privobj, dev) {
> > > + struct drm_private_state *priv_state;
> > > +
> > > + priv_state = drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state(state, privobj);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(priv_state)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(priv_state);
> > > + goto free;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
> > > drm_for_each_connector_iter(conn, &conn_iter) {
> > > struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> > > @@ -3325,12 +3336,17 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_commit_duplicated_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
> > > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > + struct drm_private_obj *privobj;
> > > + struct drm_private_state *new_priv_state;
> > >
> > > state->acquire_ctx = ctx;
> > >
> > > for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i)
> > > state->planes[i].old_state = plane->state;
> > >
> > > + for_each_new_private_obj_in_state(state, privobj, new_priv_state, i)
> > > + state->private_objs[i].old_state = privobj->state;
> > > +
> > > for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i)
> > > state->crtcs[i].old_state = crtc->state;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] drm/atomic: integrate private objects with suspend/resume helpers
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190325090641.GF2665@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190315115607.v4avbfbp3hyytsl6@ti.com>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 06:56:07AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote on Fri [2019-Mar-15 11:50:57 +0100]:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 08:44:45AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > > During a suspend cycle the atomic state is saved to be used during the
> > > restore cycle.
> > >
> > > However the current state duplication logic does not duplicate private
> > > objects. This leads to state inconsistencies at resume time.
> > >
> > > With private objects modeset lock now integrated, we can make sure that
> > > private object state are properly saved and restored.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> >
> > Why do you need this? We're doing a full atomic_check, and your
> > atomic_check should be pulling in any private state objects and
> > recomputing their states. This smells like papering over a driver bug.
>
> I have not seen any atomic_check called during the suspend duplicate
> helper. And you are correct normally the private_object state in my case
> would get pulled in during a plane atomic_check but that does not happen
> here in this step.
Yeah duplicating in suspend won't call atomic_check. Restoring the
duplicated state on resume will (or there's going to be lots of broken
drivers).
> Why wouldn't we save all the "state" artifacts so that the whole atomic
> state is consistent?
It's not needed, and might possible paper over driver bugs ...
> > The duplicate helpers should only need to duplicate the uapi-relevant
> > states, i.e. connector/crtc/planes.
... because of this reason. If your driver can't recompute the private
state from just the duplicated uapi-relevant states it's broken. Because
essentially the exact same thing might happen through the atomic ioctl
from userspace.
Hence my question: Why do you need this?
-Daniel
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > > index 540a77a2ade9..b108021cc092 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > > @@ -3189,6 +3189,7 @@ drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > > struct drm_plane *plane;
> > > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > + struct drm_private_obj *privobj;
> > > int err = 0;
> > >
> > > state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
> > > @@ -3218,6 +3219,16 @@ drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + drm_for_each_privobj(privobj, dev) {
> > > + struct drm_private_state *priv_state;
> > > +
> > > + priv_state = drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state(state, privobj);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(priv_state)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(priv_state);
> > > + goto free;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
> > > drm_for_each_connector_iter(conn, &conn_iter) {
> > > struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> > > @@ -3325,12 +3336,17 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_commit_duplicated_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > > struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
> > > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > > + struct drm_private_obj *privobj;
> > > + struct drm_private_state *new_priv_state;
> > >
> > > state->acquire_ctx = ctx;
> > >
> > > for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i)
> > > state->planes[i].old_state = plane->state;
> > >
> > > + for_each_new_private_obj_in_state(state, privobj, new_priv_state, i)
> > > + state->private_objs[i].old_state = privobj->state;
> > > +
> > > for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i)
> > > state->crtcs[i].old_state = crtc->state;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-25 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 13:44 [Patch 1/1] drm/atomic: integrate private objects with suspend/resume helpers Benoit Parrot
2019-03-14 13:44 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-03-14 15:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-14 15:54 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-03-14 15:54 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-03-14 18:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-03-15 10:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-15 10:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-15 11:56 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-03-15 11:56 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-03-25 9:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-03-25 9:06 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190325090641.GF2665@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.