From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com" <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"kasong@redhat.com" <kasong@redhat.com>,
"bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:52:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328155256.GP22720@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328074337.GA9470@jeru.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 07:43:38AM +0000, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> /* Search EFI system tables for RSDP. */
> -static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
> +static acpi_physical_address __efi_get_rsdp_addr(unsigned long config_tables, unsigned int nr_tables, int size, bool efi_64)
Break this line like this:
static acpi_physical_address
__efi_get_rsdp_addr(unsigned long config_tables, unsigned int nr_tables,
int size, bool efi_64)
> {
> acpi_physical_address rsdp_addr = 0;
You don't need that variable and can return "table" or 0 after the endif
below.
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> - unsigned long systab, systab_tables, config_tables;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Get EFI tables from systab. */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_tables; i++) {
> + acpi_physical_address table;
> + efi_guid_t guid;
> +
> + config_tables += size;
> +
> + if (efi_64) {
> + efi_config_table_64_t *tbl = (efi_config_table_64_t *)config_tables;
> +
> + guid = tbl->guid;
> + table = tbl->table;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && table >> 32) {
> + debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI config table located above 4GB.\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> + } else {
> + efi_config_table_32_t *tbl = (efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables;
> +
> + guid = tbl->guid;
> + table = tbl->table;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
> + rsdp_addr = table;
> + else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
> + return table;
> + }
> +#endif
> + return rsdp_addr;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_physical_address kexec_get_rsdp_addr(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> + struct efi_setup_data *esd;
> + efi_system_table_64_t *systab;
> + struct efi_info *ei;
> + char *sig;
Please sort function local variables declaration in a reverse christmas
tree order:
<type A> longest_variable_name;
<type B> shorter_var_name;
<type C> even_shorter;
<type D> i;
> +
> + esd = (struct efi_setup_data *) efi_get_kexec_setup_data_addr();
> + if (!esd)
> + return 0;
<---- newline here.
> + if (!esd->tables) {
> + debug_putstr("Wrong kexec SETUP_EFI data.\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ei = &boot_params->efi_info;
> + sig = (char *)&ei->efi_loader_signature;
> + if (strncmp(sig, EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
> + debug_putstr("Wrong EFI loader signature.\n");
"Wrong kexec EFI loader signature."
so that it differs from the other error message and we can know where we
are when debugging.
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Get systab from boot params. */
> + systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *) (ei->efi_systab | ((__u64)ei->efi_systab_hi << 32));
> + if (!systab)
> + error("EFI system table not found.");
Ditto.
> +
> + return __efi_get_rsdp_addr((unsigned long) esd->tables, systab->nr_tables, sizeof(efi_config_table_64_t), true);
You can easily break that line - no need to let it stick out.
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
Other than those nitpicks, yes, it looks ok to me. Please send a proper
patch.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
"fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com" <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"kasong@redhat.com" <kasong@redhat.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:52:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328155256.GP22720@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328074337.GA9470@jeru.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 07:43:38AM +0000, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> /* Search EFI system tables for RSDP. */
> -static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
> +static acpi_physical_address __efi_get_rsdp_addr(unsigned long config_tables, unsigned int nr_tables, int size, bool efi_64)
Break this line like this:
static acpi_physical_address
__efi_get_rsdp_addr(unsigned long config_tables, unsigned int nr_tables,
int size, bool efi_64)
> {
> acpi_physical_address rsdp_addr = 0;
You don't need that variable and can return "table" or 0 after the endif
below.
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> - unsigned long systab, systab_tables, config_tables;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Get EFI tables from systab. */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_tables; i++) {
> + acpi_physical_address table;
> + efi_guid_t guid;
> +
> + config_tables += size;
> +
> + if (efi_64) {
> + efi_config_table_64_t *tbl = (efi_config_table_64_t *)config_tables;
> +
> + guid = tbl->guid;
> + table = tbl->table;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && table >> 32) {
> + debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI config table located above 4GB.\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> + } else {
> + efi_config_table_32_t *tbl = (efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables;
> +
> + guid = tbl->guid;
> + table = tbl->table;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
> + rsdp_addr = table;
> + else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
> + return table;
> + }
> +#endif
> + return rsdp_addr;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_physical_address kexec_get_rsdp_addr(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> + struct efi_setup_data *esd;
> + efi_system_table_64_t *systab;
> + struct efi_info *ei;
> + char *sig;
Please sort function local variables declaration in a reverse christmas
tree order:
<type A> longest_variable_name;
<type B> shorter_var_name;
<type C> even_shorter;
<type D> i;
> +
> + esd = (struct efi_setup_data *) efi_get_kexec_setup_data_addr();
> + if (!esd)
> + return 0;
<---- newline here.
> + if (!esd->tables) {
> + debug_putstr("Wrong kexec SETUP_EFI data.\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ei = &boot_params->efi_info;
> + sig = (char *)&ei->efi_loader_signature;
> + if (strncmp(sig, EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
> + debug_putstr("Wrong EFI loader signature.\n");
"Wrong kexec EFI loader signature."
so that it differs from the other error message and we can know where we
are when debugging.
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Get systab from boot params. */
> + systab = (efi_system_table_64_t *) (ei->efi_systab | ((__u64)ei->efi_systab_hi << 32));
> + if (!systab)
> + error("EFI system table not found.");
Ditto.
> +
> + return __efi_get_rsdp_addr((unsigned long) esd->tables, systab->nr_tables, sizeof(efi_config_table_64_t), true);
You can easily break that line - no need to let it stick out.
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
Other than those nitpicks, yes, it looks ok to me. Please send a proper
patch.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 173+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 11:03 [PATCH] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided Junichi Nomura
2019-03-22 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 0:27 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 0:27 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 6:01 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:01 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:19 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:19 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:45 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-25 6:45 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-25 6:47 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 6:47 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 6:59 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:59 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 8:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 8:27 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 8:54 ` Boris Petkov
2019-03-25 8:54 ` Boris Petkov
2019-03-25 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Don't try to search RSDP from EFI when kexec-booted Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 9:25 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 10:15 ` [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided Dave Young
2019-03-25 10:15 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 10:36 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 10:36 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 11:16 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 11:16 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 12:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 12:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 12:23 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 12:23 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 23:10 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 23:10 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-26 12:46 ` Dave Young
2019-03-26 12:46 ` Dave Young
2019-03-26 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-26 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-27 1:48 ` bhe
2019-03-27 1:48 ` bhe
2019-03-27 12:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-27 12:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-28 4:17 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 4:17 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 6:26 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-28 6:26 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-28 6:43 ` bhe
2019-03-28 6:43 ` bhe
2019-03-28 7:43 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 7:43 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-03-28 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 3:05 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 3:05 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 8:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 8:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 9:05 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:05 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 9:37 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 9:37 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 9:44 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:44 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:56 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 9:56 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 7:20 ` [PATCH] x86/boot: Use efi_setup_data for searching RSDP on kexec-ed kernel Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 7:20 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 7:49 ` bhe
2019-03-29 7:49 ` bhe
2019-03-29 8:29 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 8:29 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 8:39 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 8:39 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 9:18 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:18 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:16 ` bhe
2019-03-29 9:16 ` bhe
2019-03-29 9:20 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:20 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-01 0:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Junichi Nomura
2019-04-01 0:08 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 9:41 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-02 9:41 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 11:06 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-02 11:06 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-02 10:22 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 10:22 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 12:03 ` Dave Young
2019-04-02 12:03 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 5:35 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 5:35 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 5:53 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 5:53 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 6:39 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 6:39 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 7:30 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 7:30 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 7:50 ` bhe
2019-04-03 7:50 ` bhe
2019-04-03 8:23 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:23 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:26 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:26 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 16:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-03 16:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 1:02 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 1:02 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:28 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:28 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 7:21 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 7:21 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 8:09 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:09 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:23 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 8:23 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:02 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:02 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:39 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:39 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 1:23 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-04 1:23 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-04 2:52 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 2:52 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 3:00 ` bhe
2019-04-04 3:00 ` bhe
2019-04-04 3:10 ` bhe
2019-04-04 3:10 ` bhe
2019-04-04 3:22 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 3:22 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 6:41 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 6:41 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 7:20 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 7:20 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 7:41 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 7:41 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 7:48 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 7:48 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 14:08 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 14:08 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:18 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:18 ` Dave Young
2019-04-02 10:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 10:25 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-04 7:32 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 7:32 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 14:12 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 14:12 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-05 1:36 ` Dave Young
2019-04-05 1:36 ` Dave Young
2019-04-05 4:19 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-05 4:19 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 23:11 ` [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided bhe
2019-03-28 23:11 ` bhe
2019-03-29 3:34 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 3:34 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 3:52 ` bhe
2019-03-29 3:52 ` bhe
2019-03-29 5:16 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 5:16 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 7:27 ` [PATCH] " Baoquan He
2019-03-25 7:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 8:21 ` Baoquan He
2019-03-25 8:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-25 9:03 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328155256.GP22720@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.