From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, rafael@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mhocko@suse.com, osalvador@suse.de, rppt@linux.ibm.com,
willy@infradead.org, fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers/base/memory.c: Rename the misleading parameter
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:36:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190329093659.GG7627@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190329082915.19763-2-bhe@redhat.com>
The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. This is
a relict from the past when one memory block could only contain one
section.
Rename it to start_section_nr.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index cb8347500ce2..9ea972b2ae79 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -231,13 +231,14 @@ static bool pages_correctly_probed(unsigned long start_pfn)
* OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here.
*/
static int
-memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_type)
+memory_block_action(unsigned long start_section_nr, unsigned long action,
+ int online_type)
{
unsigned long start_pfn;
unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
int ret;
- start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
+ start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(start_section_nr);
switch (action) {
case MEM_ONLINE:
@@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_t
break;
default:
WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: "
- "%ld\n", __func__, phys_index, action, action);
+ "%ld\n", __func__, start_section_nr, action, action);
ret = -EINVAL;
}
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 8:29 [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/sparse: Clean up the obsolete code comment Baoquan He
2019-03-29 8:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers/base/memory.c: Rename the misleading parameter Baoquan He
2019-03-29 9:13 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-29 9:19 ` Baoquan He
2019-03-29 9:37 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29 12:55 ` Baoquan He
2019-03-29 9:36 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2019-03-29 10:32 ` [PATCH v4 " Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29 10:43 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-03-29 9:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/sparse: Clean up the obsolete code comment Michal Hocko
2019-03-29 10:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-03-29 13:59 ` Baoquan He
2019-03-29 10:40 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-03-30 9:50 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190329093659.GG7627@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.