From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: fix syscall_get_arguments() and syscall_set_arguments()
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 21:16:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190329181619.GB32651@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190329131514.3e4ec93e@gandalf.local.home>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 669 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 01:15:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:12:21 +0300
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > RISC-V syscall arguments are located in orig_a0,a1..a5 fields
> > of struct pt_regs.
> >
> > Due to an off-by-one bug and a bug in pointer arithmetic
> > syscall_get_arguments() was reading s3..s7 fields instead of a1..a5.
> > Likewise, syscall_set_arguments() was writing s3..s7 fields
> > instead of a1..a5.
>
> Should I add this to my series? And then rebase on top of it?
This is fine with me. If you are adding the fix for riscv,
please consider adding the fix for csky, too.
--
ldv
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: fix syscall_get_arguments() and syscall_set_arguments()
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 21:16:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190329181619.GB32651@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190329131514.3e4ec93e@gandalf.local.home>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 669 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 01:15:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:12:21 +0300
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > RISC-V syscall arguments are located in orig_a0,a1..a5 fields
> > of struct pt_regs.
> >
> > Due to an off-by-one bug and a bug in pointer arithmetic
> > syscall_get_arguments() was reading s3..s7 fields instead of a1..a5.
> > Likewise, syscall_set_arguments() was writing s3..s7 fields
> > instead of a1..a5.
>
> Should I add this to my series? And then rebase on top of it?
This is fine with me. If you are adding the fix for riscv,
please consider adding the fix for csky, too.
--
ldv
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 17:12 [PATCH] riscv: fix syscall_get_arguments() and syscall_set_arguments() Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-29 17:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-29 17:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 17:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 17:52 ` David Abdurachmanov
2019-03-29 17:52 ` David Abdurachmanov
2019-03-29 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 18:11 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-29 18:11 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-29 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 18:16 ` Dmitry V. Levin [this message]
2019-03-29 18:16 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-03-29 20:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-29 20:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-30 0:26 ` Guo Ren
2019-03-30 0:26 ` Guo Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190329181619.GB32651@altlinux.org \
--to=ldv@altlinux.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.