All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARCH: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 03:34:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190330220422.GA11775@nishad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190323205937.wkrqmjfk4jycejdo@pengutronix.de>

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:59:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 06:58:14PM +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
> > This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style
> > in the Hardware Architecture subsystem.
> > 
> > Changes made by using a script provided by Joe Perches here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/46
> > and making some manual changes.
> 
> Adding a note here that for C header files
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst mandates C-like comments
> (opposed to C source files where C++ style should be used) would be a
> good idea I think.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Sorry for the late reply.

Ok, I'll do that.

Thanks for the review.

Thanks and regards,
Nishad

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARCH: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 03:34:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190330220422.GA11775@nishad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190323205937.wkrqmjfk4jycejdo@pengutronix.de>

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:59:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 06:58:14PM +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
> > This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style
> > in the Hardware Architecture subsystem.
> > 
> > Changes made by using a script provided by Joe Perches here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/46
> > and making some manual changes.
> 
> Adding a note here that for C header files
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst mandates C-like comments
> (opposed to C source files where C++ style should be used) would be a
> good idea I think.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Sorry for the late reply.

Ok, I'll do that.

Thanks for the review.

Thanks and regards,
Nishad

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-30 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-23 13:28 [PATCH] ARCH: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier Nishad Kamdar
2019-03-23 13:28 ` Nishad Kamdar
2019-03-23 20:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-03-23 20:59   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-03-30 22:04   ` Nishad Kamdar [this message]
2019-03-30 22:04     ` Nishad Kamdar
2019-03-31  6:41 ` Rob Herring
2019-03-31  6:41   ` Rob Herring
2019-04-08 13:30   ` Nishad Kamdar
2019-04-08 13:30     ` Nishad Kamdar
2019-04-08 13:30     ` Nishad Kamdar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190330220422.GA11775@nishad \
    --to=nishadkamdar@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.