From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nvmet: make MDTS value configurable
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 21:10:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401031036.GB11565@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9abfa47a-3374-a1a0-8370-1096d02743d0@suse.com>
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019@07:02:40PM -0700, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > I think it's more of a ctrl/nvmet_port configuration than a subsystem.
> >
> > For example if you have 2 HCAs, one is super strong and can transfer
> > upto 8MB and the second is old model and can transfer upto 64KiB.
> >
> > do
> >
> > id->mdts = ctrl->ops->port_mdts(req->port);
> >
> > and inside the implementation you can do
> >
> > min_not_zero(max_port_hca_cap_in_mdts_units, mdts_configfs_val);
> >
> > and it will fix the comment that is written above (we're not really
> > unlimited).
> >
> > this way we're using the low level device characteristics and also cover
> > the bio split test.
> >
> > thoughts ?
> >
> >
> Yeah, true, it should be a port configuration.
>
> I'll be updating the patch.
Wouldn't this indicate MDTS should be driven from hardware constraints
rather than user tunable knobs? I don't think we should have user
parameters if their only purpose is to test how host drivers react
to them. It's okay if they've a functional purpose, but there are so
many adjustable nvme parameters, this is a bit of a slippery slope if we
want to turn the nvme target driver into a host driver test vehicle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 12:04 [PATCH 0/2] nvmet: add some more configfs attributes Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-29 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvmet: make MDTS value configurable Hannes Reinecke
2019-03-29 17:27 ` Heitke, Kenneth
2019-03-31 15:04 ` Max Gurtovoy
2019-04-01 2:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-01 3:10 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-04-01 11:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-02 12:06 ` Max Gurtovoy
2019-04-02 23:31 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-03 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-29 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvmet: make CNTLID range configurable Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-03 18:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-03 22:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190401031036.GB11565@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.