From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: ftrace with regs
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409175238.GE9255@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408153628.GL6139@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 04:36:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:11:04AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi Torsten,
> > >
> > > On 08/02/2019 15:08, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > > > Patch series v8, as discussed.
> > > > The whole series applies cleanly on 5.0-rc5
> >
> > So what's the status now? Besides debatable minor style
> > issues there were no more objections to v8. Would this
> > go through the ARM repo or via the ftrace repo?
>
> Sorry agains for the delay on this. I'm now back in the office and in
> front of a computer daily, so I can spend a bit more time on this.
>
> Regardless of anything else, I think that we should queue the first
> three patches now. I've poked the relevant maintainers for their acks so
> that those can be taken via the arm64 tree.
>
> I'm happy to do the trivial cleanups on the last couple of patches (e.g.
> s/lr/x30), and I'm actively looking at the API rework I requested.
Ok, I've picked up patches 1-3 and I'll wait for you to spin updates to the
last two.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: ftrace with regs
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409175238.GE9255@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408153628.GL6139@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 04:36:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:11:04AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi Torsten,
> > >
> > > On 08/02/2019 15:08, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > > > Patch series v8, as discussed.
> > > > The whole series applies cleanly on 5.0-rc5
> >
> > So what's the status now? Besides debatable minor style
> > issues there were no more objections to v8. Would this
> > go through the ARM repo or via the ftrace repo?
>
> Sorry agains for the delay on this. I'm now back in the office and in
> front of a computer daily, so I can spend a bit more time on this.
>
> Regardless of anything else, I think that we should queue the first
> three patches now. I've poked the relevant maintainers for their acks so
> that those can be taken via the arm64 tree.
>
> I'm happy to do the trivial cleanups on the last couple of patches (e.g.
> s/lr/x30), and I'm actively looking at the API rework I requested.
Ok, I've picked up patches 1-3 and I'll wait for you to spin updates to the
last two.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 15:08 [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:08 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] arm64: replace -pg with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in arm64 Makefiles Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:10 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-11 11:53 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-11 11:53 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] arm64: replace -pg with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in efi Makefiles Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:10 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-11 11:59 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-11 11:59 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 15:23 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 15:23 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 20:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-08 20:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] arm64: replace -pg with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in mm/kasan Makefile Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:10 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-11 11:55 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-11 11:55 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-11 11:56 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-11 11:56 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 15:25 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 15:25 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 15:35 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-04-08 15:35 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:10 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-13 10:30 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-13 10:30 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] arm64: use -fpatchable-function-entry if available Torsten Duwe
2019-02-08 15:10 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-13 11:11 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: ftrace with regs Julien Thierry
2019-02-13 11:11 ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-11 11:49 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-03-11 11:49 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-03-11 12:18 ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-11 12:18 ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-29 10:18 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-03-29 10:18 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-04-08 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-08 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-09 17:52 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-04-09 17:52 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-10 12:27 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2019-07-10 12:27 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2019-07-24 16:15 ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-24 16:15 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-16 11:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-10-16 11:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-10-16 17:58 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-16 17:58 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-19 11:01 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-10-19 11:01 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-10-21 11:37 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 11:37 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 13:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-10-21 13:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190409175238.GE9255@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=duwe@lst.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.