From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410040413.GC7140@sol.localdomain>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:04:15PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > What's to stop you from doing just that right now? You'd need to take
> > care with barriers, but you'd need that anyway... As soon as ->i_link is set
> > you'll get no more ->get_link() on that sucker, using the cached value
> > from that point on. IDGI...
>
> 1.) The VFS won't know to drop of RCU-walk mode, so waiting an RCU grace period
> before freeing the symlink target becomes mandatory. (Which I'd like to do
> for fscrypt anyway, but doing it sanely appears to require implementing
> .destroy_inode() for ext4, f2fs, and ubifs. I hoped I could do non-RCU mode
> as a simpler first step.)
You might want to check those filesystems. All three you've mentioned *have*
->destroy_inode() already.
> 2.) The VFS won't know to use a read memory barrier when loading i_link.
> The VFS could issue one unconditionally, but it would be unnecessary for
> regular fast symlinks.
Not really. All we need on the read side is READ_ONCE(); it will supply
smp_read_barrier_depends() (which is a no-op except for alpha). On the
write side we need smp_store_release() to set ->i_link (in addition to
whatever serialization we want for actual calculation of the value to
be cached, of course).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410040413.GC7140@sol.localdomain>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:04:15PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > What's to stop you from doing just that right now? You'd need to take
> > care with barriers, but you'd need that anyway... As soon as ->i_link is set
> > you'll get no more ->get_link() on that sucker, using the cached value
> > from that point on. IDGI...
>
> 1.) The VFS won't know to drop of RCU-walk mode, so waiting an RCU grace period
> before freeing the symlink target becomes mandatory. (Which I'd like to do
> for fscrypt anyway, but doing it sanely appears to require implementing
> .destroy_inode() for ext4, f2fs, and ubifs. I hoped I could do non-RCU mode
> as a simpler first step.)
You might want to check those filesystems. All three you've mentioned *have*
->destroy_inode() already.
> 2.) The VFS won't know to use a read memory barrier when loading i_link.
> The VFS could issue one unconditionally, but it would be unnecessary for
> regular fast symlinks.
Not really. All we need on the read side is READ_ONCE(); it will supply
smp_read_barrier_depends() (which is a no-op except for alpha). On the
write side we need smp_store_release() to set ->i_link (in addition to
whatever serialization we want for actual calculation of the value to
be cached, of course).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 23:35 [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Eric Biggers
2019-04-09 23:35 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 0:33 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 0:33 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 0:45 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 0:45 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 1:04 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 1:04 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 1:22 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 1:22 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 1:22 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 1:39 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 1:39 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 2:58 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 2:58 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 3:44 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 3:44 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 4:04 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 4:04 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 4:04 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 4:16 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 4:31 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-04-10 4:31 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 5:04 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 5:04 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 5:04 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.