All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Cc: "bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mtd: rawnand: Always store info about bad block markers in chip struct
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:03:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417120333.3dc535e3@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218104122.18788-2-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

Hi Frieder,

Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> wrote on Mon, 18 Feb
2019 10:42:39 +0000:

> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> 
> The information about where the manufacturer puts the bad block
> markers inside the bad block and in the OOB data is stored in
> different places. Let's move this information to nand_chip.options
> and nand_chip.badblockpos.
> 
> As this chip-specific information is not directly related to the
> bad block table (BBT), we also rename the flags to NAND_BBM_*.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Cc: "bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mtd: rawnand: Always store info about bad block markers in chip struct
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:03:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417120333.3dc535e3@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218104122.18788-2-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

Hi Frieder,

Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> wrote on Mon, 18 Feb
2019 10:42:39 +0000:

> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> 
> The information about where the manufacturer puts the bad block
> markers inside the bad block and in the OOB data is stored in
> different places. Let's move this information to nand_chip.options
> and nand_chip.badblockpos.
> 
> As this chip-specific information is not directly related to the
> bad block table (BBT), we also rename the flags to NAND_BBM_*.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-18 10:42 [PATCH v4 0/7] mtd: rawnand: Support bad block markers in first, second or last page Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42 ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] mtd: rawnand: Always store info about bad block markers in chip struct Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-04-17 10:03   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-04-17 10:03     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] mtd: onenand: Store bad block marker position " Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-03-04 10:58   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-03-04 10:58     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-03-21  8:47     ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-03-21  8:47       ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-04-17 10:04       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-17 10:04         ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] mtd: nand: Cleanup flags and fields for bad block marker position Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-04-17 10:05   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-17 10:05     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] mtd: rawnand: ESMT: Also use the last page for bad block markers Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-04-17 10:08   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-17 10:08     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] mtd: rawnand: Support bad block markers in first, second or last page Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-03-04 11:21   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-03-04 11:21     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-03-21  9:04     ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-03-21  9:04       ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] mtd: nand: Make flags for bad block marker position more granular Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-04-17 10:05   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-17 10:05     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-18 10:42 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mtd: rawnand: AMD: Also use the last page for bad block markers Schrempf Frieder
2019-02-18 10:42   ` Schrempf Frieder
2019-04-17 10:08   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-17 10:08     ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190417120333.3dc535e3@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.