[PATCH v10 05/12] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 05/12] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 03:51:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418035120.2354-6-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190418035120.2354-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

This avoids a dependency cycle in soon-to-be-introduced
CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG: it will select CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT
which in turn selects CONFIG_KEYS. Kconfig then complains that
CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE depends on CONFIG_KEYS.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/Kconfig b/security/integrity/Kconfig
index 2ea4ec9991d5..bf76f842fcb8 100644
--- a/security/integrity/Kconfig
+++ b/security/integrity/Kconfig
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ if INTEGRITY
 
 config INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE
 	bool "Digital signature verification using multiple keyrings"
-	depends on KEYS
 	default n
+	select KEYS
 	select SIGNATURE
 	help
 	  This option enables digital signature verification support

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 05/12] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:51:13 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418035120.2354-6-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190418035120.2354-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

This avoids a dependency cycle in soon-to-be-introduced
CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG: it will select CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT
which in turn selects CONFIG_KEYS. Kconfig then complains that
CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE depends on CONFIG_KEYS.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/Kconfig b/security/integrity/Kconfig
index 2ea4ec9991d5..bf76f842fcb8 100644
--- a/security/integrity/Kconfig
+++ b/security/integrity/Kconfig
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ if INTEGRITY
 
 config INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE
 	bool "Digital signature verification using multiple keyrings"
-	depends on KEYS
 	default n
+	select KEYS
 	select SIGNATURE
 	help
 	  This option enables digital signature verification support

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 05/12] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:51:13 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418035120.2354-6-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190418035120.2354-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

This avoids a dependency cycle in soon-to-be-introduced
CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG: it will select CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT
which in turn selects CONFIG_KEYS. Kconfig then complains that
CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE depends on CONFIG_KEYS.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/Kconfig b/security/integrity/Kconfig
index 2ea4ec9991d5..bf76f842fcb8 100644
--- a/security/integrity/Kconfig
+++ b/security/integrity/Kconfig
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ if INTEGRITY
 
 config INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE
 	bool "Digital signature verification using multiple keyrings"
-	depends on KEYS
 	default n
+	select KEYS
 	select SIGNATURE
 	help
 	  This option enables digital signature verification support

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-18  3:51 [PATCH v10 00/12] Appended signatures support for IMA appraisal Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 01/12] MODSIGN: Export module signature definitions Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 15:42   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 19:03     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:03       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:03       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 02/12] PKCS#7: Refactor verify_pkcs7_signature() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 15:42   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 03/12] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_digest() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 15:42   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:42     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 04/12] integrity: Introduce struct evm_xattr Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2019-04-18  3:51   ` [PATCH v10 05/12] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 06/12] ima: Use designated initializers for struct ima_event_data Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 15:46   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:46     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:46     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 07/12] ima: Add modsig appraise_type option for module-style appended signatures Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 08/12] ima: Factor xattr_verify() out of ima_appraise_measurement() Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 15:53   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 15:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 09/12] ima: Implement support for module-style appended signatures Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 23:01   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 23:01     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 23:01     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 19:23     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:23       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:23       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 20:06       ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 20:06         ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 20:06         ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-14 12:09   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-14 12:09     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-14 12:09     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 19:27     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:27       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:27       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 10/12] ima: Collect modsig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 11/12] ima: Define ima-modsig template Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-09 23:01   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 23:01     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-09 23:01     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 19:09     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:09       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:09       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51 ` [PATCH v10 12/12] ima: Store the measurement again when appraising a modsig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-04-18  3:51   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 14:09   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 14:09     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 14:09     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-28 19:14     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:14       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2019-05-28 19:14       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

find likely ancestor, descendant, or conflicting patches for this message:
( dfblob:2ea4ec9991d dfblob:bf76f842fcb dfblob:2ea4ec9991d
dfblob:bf76f842fcb dfblob:2ea4ec9991d dfblob:bf76f842fcb )
 OR (
bs:"[PATCH v10 05/12] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it" )
	(help)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190418035120.2354-6-bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.