All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org,
	Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	ak@linux.intel.com, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Haiyan Song <haiyanx.song@intel.com>,
	npiggin@gmail.com, sj38.park@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	kemi.wang@intel.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
	Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	vinayak menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/31] mm: VMA sequence count
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:48:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418224857.GI11645@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190416134522.17540-10-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence
> counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed.
> 
> The calls to vm_write_begin/end() in unmap_page_range() are
> used to detect when a VMA is being unmap and thus that new page fault
> should not be satisfied for this VMA. If the seqcount hasn't changed when
> the page table are locked, this means we are safe to satisfy the page
> fault.
> 
> The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and
> the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have
> re-checked the vma bounds against the address.
> 
> The VMA's sequence counter is also used to detect change to various VMA's
> fields used during the page fault handling, such as:
>  - vm_start, vm_end
>  - vm_pgoff
>  - vm_flags, vm_page_prot
>  - vm_policy

^ All above are under mmap write lock ?

>  - anon_vma

^ This is either under mmap write lock or under page table lock

So my question is do we need the complexity of seqcount_t for this ?

It seems that using regular int as counter and also relying on vm_flags
when vma is unmap should do the trick.

vma_delete(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
    ...
    /*
     * Make sure the vma is mark as invalid ie neither read nor write
     * so that speculative fault back off. A racing speculative fault
     * will either see the flags as 0 or the new seqcount.
     */
    vma->vm_flags = 0;
    smp_wmb();
    vma->seqcount++;
    ...
}

Then:
speculative_fault_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                        struct spec_vmf *spvmf)
{
    ...
    spvmf->seqcount = vma->seqcount;
    smp_rmb();
    spvmf->vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
    if (!spvmf->vm_flags) {
        // Back off the vma is dying ...
        ...
    }
}

bool speculative_fault_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                              struct spec_vmf *spvmf)
{
    ...
    seqcount = vma->seqcount;
    smp_rmb();
    vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;

    if (spvmf->vm_flags != vm_flags || seqcount != spvmf->seqcount) {
        // Something did change for the vma
        return false;
    }
    return true;
}

This would also avoid the lockdep issue described below. But maybe what
i propose is stupid and i will see it after further reviewing thing.


Cheers,
Jérôme


> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> [Port to 4.12 kernel]
> [Build depends on CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
> [Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on
>  CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
> [Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by
>  using vm_raw_write* functions]
> [Fix a lock dependency warning in mmap_region() when entering the error
>  path]
> [move sequence initialisation INIT_VMA()]
> [Review the patch description about unmap_page_range()]
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h       | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm_types.h |  3 +++
>  mm/memory.c              |  2 ++
>  mm/mmap.c                | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 2ceb1d2869a6..906b9e06f18e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1410,6 +1410,9 @@ struct zap_details {
>  static inline void INIT_VMA(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->anon_vma_chain);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> @@ -1534,6 +1537,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 int subclass)
> +{
> +	write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 int subclass)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT */
> +
>  extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
>  		void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags);
>  extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index fd7d38ee2e33..e78f72eb2576 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>  	struct mempolicy *vm_policy;	/* NUMA policy for the VMA */
>  #endif
>  	struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	seqcount_t vm_sequence;
> +#endif
>  } __randomize_layout;
>  
>  struct core_thread {
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index d5bebca47d98..423fa8ea0569 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1256,6 +1256,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	unsigned long next;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(addr >= end);
> +	vm_write_begin(vma);
>  	tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
>  	pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
>  	do {
> @@ -1265,6 +1266,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  		next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details);
>  	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>  	tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
> +	vm_write_end(vma);
>  }
>  
>  
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 5ad3a3228d76..a4e4d52a5148 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  	long adjust_next = 0;
>  	int remove_next = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ?
> +	 *
> +	 * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving
> +	 * 3 locks:
> +	 *   mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim
> +	 *
> +	 * Here are the major path leading to this dependency :
> +	 *  1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem  -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem
> +	 *  2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim
> +	 *  3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem
> +	 *  4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence
> +	 *
> +	 * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in
> +	 * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted
> +	 * VMAs are not yet known.
> +	 * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will
> +	 * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait
> +	 * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault().
> +	 */
> +	vm_raw_write_begin(vma);
> +	if (next)
> +		vm_raw_write_begin(next);
> +
>  	if (next && !insert) {
>  		struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL;
>  
> @@ -950,6 +974,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  			 * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated.
>  			 */
>  			next = vma->vm_next;
> +			if (next)
> +				vm_raw_write_begin(next);
>  		} else {
>  			/*
>  			 * For the scope of the comment "next" and
> @@ -996,6 +1022,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  	if (insert && file)
>  		uprobe_mmap(insert);
>  
> +	if (next && next != vma)
> +		vm_raw_write_end(next);
> +	vm_raw_write_end(vma);
> +
>  	validate_mm(mm);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com,
	dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	kemi.wang@intel.com, Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
	vinayak menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
	Haiyan Song <haiyanx.song@intel.com>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	sj38.park@gmail.com, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/31] mm: VMA sequence count
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:48:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418224857.GI11645@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190416134522.17540-10-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence
> counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed.
> 
> The calls to vm_write_begin/end() in unmap_page_range() are
> used to detect when a VMA is being unmap and thus that new page fault
> should not be satisfied for this VMA. If the seqcount hasn't changed when
> the page table are locked, this means we are safe to satisfy the page
> fault.
> 
> The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and
> the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have
> re-checked the vma bounds against the address.
> 
> The VMA's sequence counter is also used to detect change to various VMA's
> fields used during the page fault handling, such as:
>  - vm_start, vm_end
>  - vm_pgoff
>  - vm_flags, vm_page_prot
>  - vm_policy

^ All above are under mmap write lock ?

>  - anon_vma

^ This is either under mmap write lock or under page table lock

So my question is do we need the complexity of seqcount_t for this ?

It seems that using regular int as counter and also relying on vm_flags
when vma is unmap should do the trick.

vma_delete(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
    ...
    /*
     * Make sure the vma is mark as invalid ie neither read nor write
     * so that speculative fault back off. A racing speculative fault
     * will either see the flags as 0 or the new seqcount.
     */
    vma->vm_flags = 0;
    smp_wmb();
    vma->seqcount++;
    ...
}

Then:
speculative_fault_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                        struct spec_vmf *spvmf)
{
    ...
    spvmf->seqcount = vma->seqcount;
    smp_rmb();
    spvmf->vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
    if (!spvmf->vm_flags) {
        // Back off the vma is dying ...
        ...
    }
}

bool speculative_fault_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                              struct spec_vmf *spvmf)
{
    ...
    seqcount = vma->seqcount;
    smp_rmb();
    vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;

    if (spvmf->vm_flags != vm_flags || seqcount != spvmf->seqcount) {
        // Something did change for the vma
        return false;
    }
    return true;
}

This would also avoid the lockdep issue described below. But maybe what
i propose is stupid and i will see it after further reviewing thing.


Cheers,
Jérôme


> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> [Port to 4.12 kernel]
> [Build depends on CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
> [Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on
>  CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
> [Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by
>  using vm_raw_write* functions]
> [Fix a lock dependency warning in mmap_region() when entering the error
>  path]
> [move sequence initialisation INIT_VMA()]
> [Review the patch description about unmap_page_range()]
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h       | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm_types.h |  3 +++
>  mm/memory.c              |  2 ++
>  mm/mmap.c                | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 2ceb1d2869a6..906b9e06f18e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1410,6 +1410,9 @@ struct zap_details {
>  static inline void INIT_VMA(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->anon_vma_chain);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> @@ -1534,6 +1537,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 int subclass)
> +{
> +	write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 int subclass)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT */
> +
>  extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
>  		void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags);
>  extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index fd7d38ee2e33..e78f72eb2576 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>  	struct mempolicy *vm_policy;	/* NUMA policy for the VMA */
>  #endif
>  	struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> +	seqcount_t vm_sequence;
> +#endif
>  } __randomize_layout;
>  
>  struct core_thread {
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index d5bebca47d98..423fa8ea0569 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1256,6 +1256,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	unsigned long next;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(addr >= end);
> +	vm_write_begin(vma);
>  	tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
>  	pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
>  	do {
> @@ -1265,6 +1266,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  		next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details);
>  	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>  	tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
> +	vm_write_end(vma);
>  }
>  
>  
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 5ad3a3228d76..a4e4d52a5148 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  	long adjust_next = 0;
>  	int remove_next = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ?
> +	 *
> +	 * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving
> +	 * 3 locks:
> +	 *   mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim
> +	 *
> +	 * Here are the major path leading to this dependency :
> +	 *  1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem  -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem
> +	 *  2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim
> +	 *  3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem
> +	 *  4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence
> +	 *
> +	 * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in
> +	 * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted
> +	 * VMAs are not yet known.
> +	 * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will
> +	 * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait
> +	 * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault().
> +	 */
> +	vm_raw_write_begin(vma);
> +	if (next)
> +		vm_raw_write_begin(next);
> +
>  	if (next && !insert) {
>  		struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL;
>  
> @@ -950,6 +974,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  			 * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated.
>  			 */
>  			next = vma->vm_next;
> +			if (next)
> +				vm_raw_write_begin(next);
>  		} else {
>  			/*
>  			 * For the scope of the comment "next" and
> @@ -996,6 +1022,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>  	if (insert && file)
>  		uprobe_mmap(insert);
>  
> +	if (next && next != vma)
> +		vm_raw_write_end(next);
> +	vm_raw_write_end(vma);
> +
>  	validate_mm(mm);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 196+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-16 13:44 [PATCH v12 00/31] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44 ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 01/31] mm: introduce CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 21:47   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 21:47     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-23 15:21     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23 15:21       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 02/31] x86/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 21:48   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 21:48     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 03/31] powerpc/mm: set ARCH_SUPPORTS_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 21:49   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 21:49     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 04/31] arm64/mm: define ARCH_SUPPORTS_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 14:27   ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-16 14:27     ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-16 14:31     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 14:31       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 14:41       ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-16 14:41         ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-18 21:51         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 21:51           ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-23 15:36           ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23 15:36             ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23 16:19             ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-23 16:19               ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-24 10:34               ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 10:34                 ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 05/31] mm: prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 22:04   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 22:04     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-23 15:45     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23 15:45       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 06/31] mm: introduce pte_spinlock " Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 22:05   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 22:05     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 07/31] mm: make pte_unmap_same compatible with SPF Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 22:10   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 22:10     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-23 15:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-23 15:43     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-23 15:47     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23 15:47       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44 ` [PATCH v12 08/31] mm: introduce INIT_VMA() Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:44   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 22:22   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-18 22:22     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 09/31] mm: VMA sequence count Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 22:48   ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2019-04-18 22:48     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-19 15:45     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-19 15:45       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 15:51       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 15:51         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 10/31] mm: protect VMA modifications using " Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 19:43   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 19:43     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 11/31] mm: protect mremap() against SPF hanlder Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 19:51   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 19:51     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-23 15:51     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23 15:51       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 12/31] mm: protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 19:53   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 19:53     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 13/31] mm: cache some VMA fields in the vm_fault structure Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:06   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:06     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 14/31] mm/migrate: Pass vm_fault pointer to migrate_misplaced_page() Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:09   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:09     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 15/31] mm: introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:11   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:11     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 16/31] mm: introduce __vm_normal_page() Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:15   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:15     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 17/31] mm: introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap() Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:18   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:18     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 18/31] mm: protect against PTE changes done by dup_mmap() Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:32   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:32     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-24 10:33     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 10:33       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 19/31] mm: protect the RB tree with a sequence lock Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:33   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:33     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 20/31] mm: introduce vma reference counter Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:36   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:36     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-24 14:26     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 14:26       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 21/31] mm: Introduce find_vma_rcu() Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 20:57   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 20:57     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-24 14:39     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 14:39       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-23  9:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23  9:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 18:13     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-04-23 18:13       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2019-04-24  7:57     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24  7:57       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 22/31] mm: provide speculative fault infrastructure Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 21:26   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 21:26     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-24 14:56     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 14:56       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 15:13       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-24 15:13         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 23/31] mm: don't do swap readahead during speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 21:36   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-22 21:36     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-24 14:57     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 14:57       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 24/31] mm: adding speculative page fault failure trace events Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 25/31] perf: add a speculative page fault sw event Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 26/31] perf tools: add support for the SPF perf event Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 27/31] mm: add speculative page fault vmstats Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 28/31] x86/mm: add speculative pagefault handling Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 29/31] powerpc/mm: add speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 30/31] arm64/mm: " Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH v12 31/31] mm: Add a speculative page fault switch in sysctl Laurent Dufour
2019-04-16 13:45   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-22 21:29 ` [PATCH v12 00/31] Speculative page faults Michel Lespinasse
2019-04-22 21:29   ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-04-23  9:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23  9:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-24  7:33     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24  7:33       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-27  1:53       ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-04-27  1:53         ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-04-23 10:47   ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-23 10:47     ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-23 12:41     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-23 12:41       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-04-23 12:48       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 12:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 13:42       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-23 13:42         ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-24 18:01   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-24 18:01     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-27  6:00     ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-04-27  6:00       ` Michel Lespinasse
2019-04-23 11:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-23 11:35   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-06-06  6:51 ` Haiyan Song
2019-06-06  6:51   ` Haiyan Song
2019-06-14  8:37   ` Laurent Dufour
2019-06-14  8:37     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-06-14  8:44     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-06-14  8:44       ` Laurent Dufour
2019-06-20  8:19       ` Haiyan Song
2019-06-20  8:19         ` Haiyan Song
2020-07-06  9:25         ` Chinwen Chang
2020-07-06  9:25           ` Chinwen Chang
2020-07-06 12:27           ` Laurent Dufour
2020-07-06 12:27             ` Laurent Dufour
2020-07-07  5:31             ` Chinwen Chang
2020-07-07  5:31               ` Chinwen Chang
2020-12-14  2:03               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-14  2:03                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-14  9:36                 ` Laurent Dufour
2020-12-14  9:36                   ` Laurent Dufour
2020-12-14 18:10                   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-14 18:10                     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190418224857.GI11645@redhat.com \
    --to=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=haiyanx.song@intel.com \
    --cc=haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=opensource.ganesh@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj38.park@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vinayakm.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.