From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kevin.tian-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
jacob.jun.pan-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Don't request page request irq under dmar_global_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:43:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190419064329.17946-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Requesting page reqest irq under dmar_global_lock could cause
potential lock race condition (caught by lockdep).
[ 4.100055] ======================================================
[ 4.100063] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 4.100072] 5.1.0-rc4+ #2169 Not tainted
[ 4.100078] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 4.100086] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 4.100094] 000000007dcbe3c3 (dmar_lock){+.+.}, at: dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x35/0x140
[ 4.100112] but task is already holding lock:
[ 4.100120] 0000000060bbe946 (dmar_global_lock){++++}, at: intel_iommu_init+0x191/0x1438
[ 4.100136] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 4.100146] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 4.100155]
-> #2 (dmar_global_lock){++++}:
[ 4.100169] down_read+0x44/0xa0
[ 4.100178] intel_irq_remapping_alloc+0xb2/0x7b0
[ 4.100186] mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9e/0x2e0
[ 4.100195] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x131/0x330
[ 4.100203] alloc_isa_irq_from_domain.isra.4+0x9a/0xd0
[ 4.100212] mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x244/0x310
[ 4.100221] setup_IO_APIC+0x757/0x7ed
[ 4.100229] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x1c
[ 4.100238] start_kernel+0x425/0x4e3
[ 4.100247] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 4.100254]
-> #1 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}:
[ 4.100265] __mutex_lock+0x7f/0x9d0
[ 4.100273] __irq_domain_add+0x195/0x2b0
[ 4.100280] irq_domain_create_hierarchy+0x3d/0x40
[ 4.100289] msi_create_irq_domain+0x32/0x110
[ 4.100297] dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x111/0x140
[ 4.100305] dmar_set_interrupt.part.14+0x1a/0x70
[ 4.100314] enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x2c/0x6c
[ 4.100323] apic_bsp_setup+0x75/0x7a
[ 4.100330] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x1c
[ 4.100338] start_kernel+0x425/0x4e3
[ 4.100346] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 4.100352]
-> #0 (dmar_lock){+.+.}:
[ 4.100364] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 4.100372] __mutex_lock+0x7f/0x9d0
[ 4.100379] dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x35/0x140
[ 4.100389] intel_svm_enable_prq+0x61/0x180
[ 4.100397] intel_iommu_init+0x1128/0x1438
[ 4.100406] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x3f
[ 4.100414] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2be
[ 4.100422] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f0/0x27c
[ 4.100431] kernel_init+0xa/0x110
[ 4.100438] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 4.100444]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 4.100454] Chain exists of:
dmar_lock --> irq_domain_mutex --> dmar_global_lock
[ 4.100469] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 4.100476] CPU0 CPU1
[ 4.100483] ---- ----
[ 4.100488] lock(dmar_global_lock);
[ 4.100495] lock(irq_domain_mutex);
[ 4.100503] lock(dmar_global_lock);
[ 4.100512] lock(dmar_lock);
[ 4.100518]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Reported-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Fixes: a222a7f0bb6c9 ("iommu/vt-d: Implement page request handling")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index 3d504b685dd8..c1f2f83e25d2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3498,7 +3498,13 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
if (pasid_supported(iommu) && ecap_prs(iommu->ecap)) {
+ /*
+ * Call dmar_alloc_hwirq() with dmar_global_lock held,
+ * could cause possible lock race condition.
+ */
+ up_write(&dmar_global_lock);
ret = intel_svm_enable_prq(iommu);
+ down_write(&dmar_global_lock);
if (ret)
goto free_iommu;
}
--
2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
jacob.jun.pan@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Don't request page request irq under dmar_global_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:43:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190419064329.17946-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190419064329.lqiNWXYJpJUi84PIYSvq1x74dozp9pb7alp5a2XrPNY@z> (raw)
Requesting page reqest irq under dmar_global_lock could cause
potential lock race condition (caught by lockdep).
[ 4.100055] ======================================================
[ 4.100063] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 4.100072] 5.1.0-rc4+ #2169 Not tainted
[ 4.100078] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 4.100086] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 4.100094] 000000007dcbe3c3 (dmar_lock){+.+.}, at: dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x35/0x140
[ 4.100112] but task is already holding lock:
[ 4.100120] 0000000060bbe946 (dmar_global_lock){++++}, at: intel_iommu_init+0x191/0x1438
[ 4.100136] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 4.100146] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 4.100155]
-> #2 (dmar_global_lock){++++}:
[ 4.100169] down_read+0x44/0xa0
[ 4.100178] intel_irq_remapping_alloc+0xb2/0x7b0
[ 4.100186] mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9e/0x2e0
[ 4.100195] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x131/0x330
[ 4.100203] alloc_isa_irq_from_domain.isra.4+0x9a/0xd0
[ 4.100212] mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x244/0x310
[ 4.100221] setup_IO_APIC+0x757/0x7ed
[ 4.100229] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x1c
[ 4.100238] start_kernel+0x425/0x4e3
[ 4.100247] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 4.100254]
-> #1 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}:
[ 4.100265] __mutex_lock+0x7f/0x9d0
[ 4.100273] __irq_domain_add+0x195/0x2b0
[ 4.100280] irq_domain_create_hierarchy+0x3d/0x40
[ 4.100289] msi_create_irq_domain+0x32/0x110
[ 4.100297] dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x111/0x140
[ 4.100305] dmar_set_interrupt.part.14+0x1a/0x70
[ 4.100314] enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x2c/0x6c
[ 4.100323] apic_bsp_setup+0x75/0x7a
[ 4.100330] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x1c
[ 4.100338] start_kernel+0x425/0x4e3
[ 4.100346] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 4.100352]
-> #0 (dmar_lock){+.+.}:
[ 4.100364] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 4.100372] __mutex_lock+0x7f/0x9d0
[ 4.100379] dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x35/0x140
[ 4.100389] intel_svm_enable_prq+0x61/0x180
[ 4.100397] intel_iommu_init+0x1128/0x1438
[ 4.100406] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x3f
[ 4.100414] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2be
[ 4.100422] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f0/0x27c
[ 4.100431] kernel_init+0xa/0x110
[ 4.100438] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 4.100444]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 4.100454] Chain exists of:
dmar_lock --> irq_domain_mutex --> dmar_global_lock
[ 4.100469] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 4.100476] CPU0 CPU1
[ 4.100483] ---- ----
[ 4.100488] lock(dmar_global_lock);
[ 4.100495] lock(irq_domain_mutex);
[ 4.100503] lock(dmar_global_lock);
[ 4.100512] lock(dmar_lock);
[ 4.100518]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Fixes: a222a7f0bb6c9 ("iommu/vt-d: Implement page request handling")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index 3d504b685dd8..c1f2f83e25d2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3498,7 +3498,13 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
if (pasid_supported(iommu) && ecap_prs(iommu->ecap)) {
+ /*
+ * Call dmar_alloc_hwirq() with dmar_global_lock held,
+ * could cause possible lock race condition.
+ */
+ up_write(&dmar_global_lock);
ret = intel_svm_enable_prq(iommu);
+ down_write(&dmar_global_lock);
if (ret)
goto free_iommu;
}
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Don't request page request irq under dmar_global_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:43:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190419064329.17946-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Requesting page reqest irq under dmar_global_lock could cause
potential lock race condition (caught by lockdep).
[ 4.100055] ======================================================
[ 4.100063] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 4.100072] 5.1.0-rc4+ #2169 Not tainted
[ 4.100078] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 4.100086] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 4.100094] 000000007dcbe3c3 (dmar_lock){+.+.}, at: dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x35/0x140
[ 4.100112] but task is already holding lock:
[ 4.100120] 0000000060bbe946 (dmar_global_lock){++++}, at: intel_iommu_init+0x191/0x1438
[ 4.100136] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 4.100146] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 4.100155]
-> #2 (dmar_global_lock){++++}:
[ 4.100169] down_read+0x44/0xa0
[ 4.100178] intel_irq_remapping_alloc+0xb2/0x7b0
[ 4.100186] mp_irqdomain_alloc+0x9e/0x2e0
[ 4.100195] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x131/0x330
[ 4.100203] alloc_isa_irq_from_domain.isra.4+0x9a/0xd0
[ 4.100212] mp_map_pin_to_irq+0x244/0x310
[ 4.100221] setup_IO_APIC+0x757/0x7ed
[ 4.100229] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x1c
[ 4.100238] start_kernel+0x425/0x4e3
[ 4.100247] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 4.100254]
-> #1 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}:
[ 4.100265] __mutex_lock+0x7f/0x9d0
[ 4.100273] __irq_domain_add+0x195/0x2b0
[ 4.100280] irq_domain_create_hierarchy+0x3d/0x40
[ 4.100289] msi_create_irq_domain+0x32/0x110
[ 4.100297] dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x111/0x140
[ 4.100305] dmar_set_interrupt.part.14+0x1a/0x70
[ 4.100314] enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x2c/0x6c
[ 4.100323] apic_bsp_setup+0x75/0x7a
[ 4.100330] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x1c
[ 4.100338] start_kernel+0x425/0x4e3
[ 4.100346] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 4.100352]
-> #0 (dmar_lock){+.+.}:
[ 4.100364] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1c0
[ 4.100372] __mutex_lock+0x7f/0x9d0
[ 4.100379] dmar_alloc_hwirq+0x35/0x140
[ 4.100389] intel_svm_enable_prq+0x61/0x180
[ 4.100397] intel_iommu_init+0x1128/0x1438
[ 4.100406] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x3f
[ 4.100414] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2be
[ 4.100422] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f0/0x27c
[ 4.100431] kernel_init+0xa/0x110
[ 4.100438] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 4.100444]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 4.100454] Chain exists of:
dmar_lock --> irq_domain_mutex --> dmar_global_lock
[ 4.100469] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 4.100476] CPU0 CPU1
[ 4.100483] ---- ----
[ 4.100488] lock(dmar_global_lock);
[ 4.100495] lock(irq_domain_mutex);
[ 4.100503] lock(dmar_global_lock);
[ 4.100512] lock(dmar_lock);
[ 4.100518]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Fixes: a222a7f0bb6c9 ("iommu/vt-d: Implement page request handling")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index 3d504b685dd8..c1f2f83e25d2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3498,7 +3498,13 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
if (pasid_supported(iommu) && ecap_prs(iommu->ecap)) {
+ /*
+ * Call dmar_alloc_hwirq() with dmar_global_lock held,
+ * could cause possible lock race condition.
+ */
+ up_write(&dmar_global_lock);
ret = intel_svm_enable_prq(iommu);
+ down_write(&dmar_global_lock);
if (ret)
goto free_iommu;
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-19 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-19 6:43 Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-04-19 6:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Don't request page request irq under dmar_global_lock Lu Baolu
2019-04-19 6:43 ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-26 14:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2019-04-26 14:45 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190419064329.17946-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kevin.tian-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.