From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: "timur@kernel.org" <timur@kernel.org>,
"Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com" <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:23:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190422032310.GA8300@Asurada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR04MB6479817B69545A662FFB43B4E3220@VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> Hi
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> > we
> > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which is
> > > not flexible.
> > >
> > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> > > give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to the
> > > sample rate.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> >
> > A couple of more small comments.
> >
> > And please add this when you resend:
> > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> >
> > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> >
> > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop this line -
> > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> > unsupported cases.
>
> I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a reminder.
Okay. Let's use something more practical like:
+* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the function:
+* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate
+* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"timur@kernel.org" <timur@kernel.org>,
"Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com" <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:23:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190422032310.GA8300@Asurada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR04MB6479817B69545A662FFB43B4E3220@VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> Hi
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> > we
> > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which is
> > > not flexible.
> > >
> > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> > > give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to the
> > > sample rate.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> >
> > A couple of more small comments.
> >
> > And please add this when you resend:
> > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> >
> > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> >
> > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop this line -
> > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> > unsupported cases.
>
> I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a reminder.
Okay. Let's use something more practical like:
+* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the function:
+* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate
+* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-22 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-22 3:15 [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function S.j. Wang
2019-04-22 3:15 ` S.j. Wang
2019-04-22 3:23 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2019-04-22 3:23 ` Nicolin Chen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-22 3:34 S.j. Wang
2019-04-22 3:34 ` S.j. Wang
2019-04-22 2:32 [PATCH V5 0/3] Support more sample rate in asrc S.j. Wang
2019-04-22 2:32 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function S.j. Wang
2019-04-22 2:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-04-22 2:57 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190422032310.GA8300@Asurada \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.