From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425123803.00bbb86d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425073142.GA24829@richard>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:31:42 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:39AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >In case of UEFI, RSDP doesn't have to be located in lowmem,
> >it could be placed at any address. Make sure that test won't
> >break if it is placed above the first 4Gb of address space.
> >
> >PS:
> >While at it cleanup some local variables as we don't really
> >need them.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> >Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> >---
> >v2:
> > - s/In case of UEFI/In case of UEFI,/ (Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>)
> >---
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >index 2ee044c..c29dcf4 100644
> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> > typedef struct {
> > const char *machine;
> > const char *variant;
> >- uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> >+ uint64_t rsdp_addr;
> > uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> > GArray *tables;
> > uint32_t smbios_ep_addr;
> >@@ -86,13 +86,11 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
> >
> > static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> >- uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;
> >- uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
> >+ uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table;
> >
> >- acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, addr, rsdp_table);
> >- revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >+ acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, data->rsdp_addr, rsdp_table);
>
> Ok, I think this is the reason you change the second parameter from uint32_t
> to uint64_t in 1st patch.
>
> Maybe we need to move that on to this one?
Sure.
There is one additional path to make 64-bit table pointers support a bit more complete.
I'll respin series once travis build passes.
> >
> >- switch (revision) {
> >+ switch (rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */]) {
> > case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
> > g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> >--
> >2.7.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425123803.00bbb86d@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190425103803.BGGl-yK8Y-Fss-dajWh6nGJlfZCs7FUmd4qSjYFTiYQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425073142.GA24829@richard>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:31:42 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:39AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >In case of UEFI, RSDP doesn't have to be located in lowmem,
> >it could be placed at any address. Make sure that test won't
> >break if it is placed above the first 4Gb of address space.
> >
> >PS:
> >While at it cleanup some local variables as we don't really
> >need them.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> >Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> >---
> >v2:
> > - s/In case of UEFI/In case of UEFI,/ (Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>)
> >---
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >index 2ee044c..c29dcf4 100644
> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> > typedef struct {
> > const char *machine;
> > const char *variant;
> >- uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> >+ uint64_t rsdp_addr;
> > uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> > GArray *tables;
> > uint32_t smbios_ep_addr;
> >@@ -86,13 +86,11 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
> >
> > static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> >- uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;
> >- uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
> >+ uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table;
> >
> >- acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, addr, rsdp_table);
> >- revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >+ acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, data->rsdp_addr, rsdp_table);
>
> Ok, I think this is the reason you change the second parameter from uint32_t
> to uint64_t in 1st patch.
>
> Maybe we need to move that on to this one?
Sure.
There is one additional path to make 64-bit table pointers support a bit more complete.
I'll respin series once travis build passes.
> >
> >- switch (revision) {
> >+ switch (rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */]) {
> > case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
> > g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> >--
> >2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 5:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] tests: acpi: add UEFI (ARM) testing support Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 7:22 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 7:22 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 8:07 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 8:07 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 8:23 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 8:23 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] tests: acpi: rename acpi_parse_rsdp_table() into acpi_fetch_rsdp_table() Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 7:24 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 7:24 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 7:31 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 7:31 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:38 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-04-25 10:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/13] tests: acpi: fetch X_DSDT if pointer to DSDT is 0 Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 7:44 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 7:44 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/13] tests: acpi: skip FACS table if board uses hw reduced ACPI profile Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 7:48 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 7:48 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/13] tests: acpi: move boot_sector_init() into x86 tests branch Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/13] tests: acpi: add acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi() helper Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 8:00 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 8:00 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:56 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:56 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 8:08 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 8:08 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/13] tests: acpi: ignore SMBIOS tests when UEFI firmware is used Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:28 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:28 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/13] tests: add expected ACPI tables for arm/virt board Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 16:51 ` x00249684
2019-04-25 16:51 ` x00249684
2019-04-26 11:54 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 11:54 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 16:28 ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 16:28 ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:30 ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:30 ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 17:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-26 17:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/13] tests: acpi: refactor rebuild-expected-aml.sh to dump ACPI tables for a specified list of targets Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 8:20 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 8:20 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] tests: acpi: print error unable to dump ACPI table during rebuild Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 8:22 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 8:22 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 11:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190425123803.00bbb86d@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.