Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable eLLC caching of display buffers for SKL+

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:15:43PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:09:07AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-04-15 15:16:41)
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Since SKL the eLLC has been sitting on the far side of the system
> > > agent, meaning the display engine can utilize it. Let's enable that.
> > > 
> > > I chose WB for the caching mode, because my numbers are indicating
> > > that WT might actually be WB and WC might actually be UC. I'm not
> > > 100% sure that is indeed the case but at least my simple rendercopy
> > > based benchmark didn't see any difference in performance.
> > > 
> > > Also if I configure things to do LLCeLLC+WT I still get cache dirt
> > > on my screen, suggesting that is in fact operating in WB mode
> > > anyway. This is also the reason I had to fix the MOCS target cache
> > > to really say PTE rather than LLC+eLLC.
> > 
> > We also need to check with hybrid setups that supply buffers via prime,
> > and we may need to end up marking those as explicitly uncached.
> 
> I think all memory access should be able to snoop the eLLC. But yeah,
> this should be confirmed on actual hardware. Anyone have a prime setup
> handy?

It occurred to me that finding a machine for this might be a little
difficult as most gt3e/gt4e chips are only available in laptops/nucs/etc.
IIRC there are some Xeons that would qualify, but I suppose those are
somewhat rare. Not sure if there are any other desktop parts that have
ellc.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx