From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:45:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426224542.GD31470@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426151114.GB20438@lst.de>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:11:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:00:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > The issue is driver(NVMe) specific, the race window is just between
> > between blk_cleanup_queue() and removing the ns from the controller namspace
> > list in nvme_ns_remove()
>
> And I wouldn't be surprised if others have the same issue.
SCSI hasn't such issue, and loop/null/virtio-blk doesn't too.
>
> >
> > blk_mq_init_queue() does hold one refcount, and its counter-part is
> > blk_cleanup_queue().
> >
> > It is simply ugly to ask blk_mq_init_queue() to grab a refcnt for driver,
> > then who is the counter-part for releasing the extra refcount?
>
> Well, the problem is exactly that blk_cleanup_queue drops the reference.
> If move the blk_put_queue() call from the end of it to the callers the
> callers can keep the reference as long as they need them, and we wouldn't
> need an extra reference.
It depends on driver.
Still no difference between your suggestion and the way in this patch, given
driver specific change is a must. Even it is more clean to hold the
queue refocunt by drivers explicitly because we usually do the get/put pair
in one place, instead that getting refcnt in one subsystem, and doing put in
another place.
I am going to drop this patch in V8 since my original plan is to fix block
layer's race in this patchset.
Thanks,
Ming
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:45:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426224542.GD31470@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426151114.GB20438@lst.de>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019@05:11:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019@09:00:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > The issue is driver(NVMe) specific, the race window is just between
> > between blk_cleanup_queue() and removing the ns from the controller namspace
> > list in nvme_ns_remove()
>
> And I wouldn't be surprised if others have the same issue.
SCSI hasn't such issue, and loop/null/virtio-blk doesn't too.
>
> >
> > blk_mq_init_queue() does hold one refcount, and its counter-part is
> > blk_cleanup_queue().
> >
> > It is simply ugly to ask blk_mq_init_queue() to grab a refcnt for driver,
> > then who is the counter-part for releasing the extra refcount?
>
> Well, the problem is exactly that blk_cleanup_queue drops the reference.
> If move the blk_put_queue() call from the end of it to the callers the
> callers can keep the reference as long as they need them, and we wouldn't
> need an extra reference.
It depends on driver.
Still no difference between your suggestion and the way in this patch, given
driver specific change is a must. Even it is more clean to hold the
queue refocunt by drivers explicitly because we usually do the get/put pair
in one place, instead that getting refcnt in one subsystem, and doing put in
another place.
I am going to drop this patch in V8 since my original plan is to fix block
layer's race in this patchset.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 11:02 [PATCH V7 0/9] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 0:53 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 0:53 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 7:35 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 7:35 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] blk-mq: move all hctx alloction & initialization into __blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 0:55 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 0:55 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 1:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 1:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] blk-mq: split blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx into two parts Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] blk-mq: always free hctx after request queue is freed Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-24 11:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] nvme: hold request queue's refcount in ns's whole lifetime Ming Lei
2019-04-24 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-24 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-24 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-25 1:00 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-25 1:00 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-26 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-26 22:49 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 22:49 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-26 22:45 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-26 22:45 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-27 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-27 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190426224542.GD31470@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.