From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle virtual mode in XIVE VCPU push code
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:57:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429085745.GA17146@blackberry> (raw)
From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
The code in book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S that pushes the XIVE virtual CPU
context to the hardware currently assumes it is being called in real
mode, which is usually true. There is however a path by which it can
be executed in virtual mode, in the case where indep_threads_mode = N.
A virtual CPU executing on an offline secondary thread can take a
hypervisor interrupt in virtual mode and return from the
kvmppc_hv_entry() call after the kvm_secondary_got_guest label.
It is possible for it to be given another vcpu to execute before it
gets to execute the stop instruction. In that case it will call
kvmppc_hv_entry() for the second VCPU in virtual mode, and the XIVE
vCPU push code will be executed in virtual mode. The result in that
case will be a host crash due to an unexpected data storage interrupt
caused by executing the stdcix instruction in virtual mode.
This fixes it by adding a code path for virtual mode, which uses the
virtual TIMA pointer and normal load/store instructions.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - wrote patch description]
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 5df137d..3f19f8b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -944,17 +944,27 @@ ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XICS
/* We are entering the guest on that thread, push VCPU to XIVE */
- ld r10, HSTATE_XIVE_TIMA_PHYS(r13)
- cmpldi cr0, r10, 0
- beq no_xive
ld r11, VCPU_XIVE_SAVED_STATE(r4)
li r9, TM_QW1_OS
+ lwz r8, VCPU_XIVE_CAM_WORD(r4)
+ li r7, TM_QW1_OS + TM_WORD2
+ mfmsr r0
+ andi. r0, r0, MSR_DR /* in real mode? */
+ beq 2f
+ ld r10, HSTATE_XIVE_TIMA_VIRT(r13)
+ cmpldi cr1, r10, 0
+ beq cr1, no_xive
+ eieio
+ stdx r11,r9,r10
+ stwx r8,r7,r10
+ b 3f
+2: ld r10, HSTATE_XIVE_TIMA_PHYS(r13)
+ cmpldi cr1, r10, 0
+ beq cr1, no_xive
eieio
stdcix r11,r9,r10
- lwz r11, VCPU_XIVE_CAM_WORD(r4)
- li r9, TM_QW1_OS + TM_WORD2
- stwcix r11,r9,r10
- li r9, 1
+ stwcix r8,r7,r10
+3: li r9, 1
stb r9, VCPU_XIVE_PUSHED(r4)
eieio
@@ -973,12 +983,16 @@ ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
* on, we mask it.
*/
lbz r0, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_ON(r4)
- cmpwi r0,0
- beq 1f
- ld r10, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_RADDR(r4)
+ cmpwi cr1, r0,0
+ beq cr1, 1f
li r9, XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_01
+ beq 4f /* in real mode? */
+ ld r10, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_VADDR(r4)
+ ldx r0, r10, r9
+ b 5f
+4: ld r10, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_RADDR(r4)
ldcix r0, r10, r9
- sync
+5: sync
/* We have a possible subtle race here: The escalation interrupt might
* have fired and be on its way to the host queue while we mask it,
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle virtual mode in XIVE VCPU push code
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:57:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429085745.GA17146@blackberry> (raw)
From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
The code in book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S that pushes the XIVE virtual CPU
context to the hardware currently assumes it is being called in real
mode, which is usually true. There is however a path by which it can
be executed in virtual mode, in the case where indep_threads_mode = N.
A virtual CPU executing on an offline secondary thread can take a
hypervisor interrupt in virtual mode and return from the
kvmppc_hv_entry() call after the kvm_secondary_got_guest label.
It is possible for it to be given another vcpu to execute before it
gets to execute the stop instruction. In that case it will call
kvmppc_hv_entry() for the second VCPU in virtual mode, and the XIVE
vCPU push code will be executed in virtual mode. The result in that
case will be a host crash due to an unexpected data storage interrupt
caused by executing the stdcix instruction in virtual mode.
This fixes it by adding a code path for virtual mode, which uses the
virtual TIMA pointer and normal load/store instructions.
[paulus@ozlabs.org - wrote patch description]
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 5df137d..3f19f8b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -944,17 +944,27 @@ ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XICS
/* We are entering the guest on that thread, push VCPU to XIVE */
- ld r10, HSTATE_XIVE_TIMA_PHYS(r13)
- cmpldi cr0, r10, 0
- beq no_xive
ld r11, VCPU_XIVE_SAVED_STATE(r4)
li r9, TM_QW1_OS
+ lwz r8, VCPU_XIVE_CAM_WORD(r4)
+ li r7, TM_QW1_OS + TM_WORD2
+ mfmsr r0
+ andi. r0, r0, MSR_DR /* in real mode? */
+ beq 2f
+ ld r10, HSTATE_XIVE_TIMA_VIRT(r13)
+ cmpldi cr1, r10, 0
+ beq cr1, no_xive
+ eieio
+ stdx r11,r9,r10
+ stwx r8,r7,r10
+ b 3f
+2: ld r10, HSTATE_XIVE_TIMA_PHYS(r13)
+ cmpldi cr1, r10, 0
+ beq cr1, no_xive
eieio
stdcix r11,r9,r10
- lwz r11, VCPU_XIVE_CAM_WORD(r4)
- li r9, TM_QW1_OS + TM_WORD2
- stwcix r11,r9,r10
- li r9, 1
+ stwcix r8,r7,r10
+3: li r9, 1
stb r9, VCPU_XIVE_PUSHED(r4)
eieio
@@ -973,12 +983,16 @@ ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
* on, we mask it.
*/
lbz r0, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_ON(r4)
- cmpwi r0,0
- beq 1f
- ld r10, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_RADDR(r4)
+ cmpwi cr1, r0,0
+ beq cr1, 1f
li r9, XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_01
+ beq 4f /* in real mode? */
+ ld r10, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_VADDR(r4)
+ ldx r0, r10, r9
+ b 5f
+4: ld r10, VCPU_XIVE_ESC_RADDR(r4)
ldcix r0, r10, r9
- sync
+5: sync
/* We have a possible subtle race here: The escalation interrupt might
* have fired and be on its way to the host queue while we mask it,
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 8:57 Paul Mackerras [this message]
2019-04-29 8:57 ` [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle virtual mode in XIVE VCPU push code Paul Mackerras
2019-04-30 10:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2019-04-30 10:07 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190429085745.GA17146@blackberry \
--to=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.