From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: digicolor: set range
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:47:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430114702.GD11339@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ebbu3lz.fsf@tarshish>
On 30/04/2019 14:36:24+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> > While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
> > itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> >
> > rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
> > + rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
>
> Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
> value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.
>
It should be set to the maximum UNIX timestamp the RTC can be set to
while keeping range_min to range_max contiguous.
In the digicolor case, you could go up to 8589934590 (Wed Mar 16
12:56:30 UTC 2242) but the driver only writes DC_RTC_REFERENCE and I'm
not sure it can also update DC_RTC_TIME safely.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: digicolor: set range
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:47:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430114702.GD11339@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ebbu3lz.fsf@tarshish>
On 30/04/2019 14:36:24+0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Tue, Apr 30 2019, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> > While the range of REFERENCE + TIME is actually 33 bits, the counter
> > itself (TIME) is a 32-bits seconds counter.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > index 5bb14c56bc9a..e6e16aaac254 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> >
> > rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &dc_rtc_ops;
> > + rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
>
> Where can I find documentation on the meaning and usage of the range_max
> value? I could not find anything in the kernel source.
>
It should be set to the maximum UNIX timestamp the RTC can be set to
while keeping range_min to range_max contiguous.
In the digicolor case, you could go up to 8589934590 (Wed Mar 16
12:56:30 UTC 2242) but the driver only writes DC_RTC_REFERENCE and I'm
not sure it can also update DC_RTC_TIME safely.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 9:32 [PATCH 1/4] rtc: digicolor: fix possible race condition Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 9:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] rtc: digicolor: set range Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 9:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 11:36 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 11:36 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 11:47 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2019-04-30 11:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 12:20 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 12:20 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 13:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 13:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 15:25 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 15:25 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 19:10 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 19:10 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 9:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] rtc: digicolor: use .set_time Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 9:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 12:21 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 12:21 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 9:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] rtc: digicolor: convert to SPDX identifier Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 9:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-30 12:22 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 12:22 ` Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] rtc: digicolor: fix possible race condition Baruch Siach
2019-04-30 11:25 ` Baruch Siach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430114702.GD11339@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.