All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/12] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap()
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 10:46:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190503084603.GE15740@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155677654842.2336373.17000900051843592636.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:55:48PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Allow sub-section sized ranges to be added to the memmap.
> populate_section_memmap() takes an explict pfn range rather than
> assuming a full section, and those parameters are plumbed all the way
> through to vmmemap_populate(). There should be no sub-section usage in
> current deployments. New warnings are added to clarify which memmap
> allocation paths are sub-section capable.
> 
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |    4 ++-
>  include/linux/mm.h    |    4 ++-
>  mm/sparse-vmemmap.c   |   21 +++++++++++------
>  mm/sparse.c           |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 20d14254b686..bb018d09d2dc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -1457,7 +1457,9 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
> +	if (end - start < PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct page))
maybe just:

	if (PHYS_PFN(end) - PHYS_PFN(start) < PAGES_PER_SECTION) ?
> +		err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node);
> +	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
>  		err = vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap);
>  	else if (altmap) {
>  		pr_err_once("%s: no cpu support for altmap allocations\n",

Although the following looks more clear to me:

int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
                struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
{
        int err;
        bool partial_section = (PHYS_PFN(end) - PFN_PHYS(start)) < PAGES_PER_SECTION;

        if (partial_section || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
                err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node);
        else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
                err = vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap);
        else if (altmap) {
                pr_err_once("%s: no cpu support for altmap allocations\n",
                                __func__);
                err = -ENOMEM;
        }

        if (!err)
                sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
        return err;
}

> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 0e8834ac32b7..5360a0e4051d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2748,8 +2748,8 @@ const char * arch_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>  void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long rip);
>  
>  void *sparse_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size);
> -struct page *sparse_mem_map_populate(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap);
> +struct page * __populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap);
>  pgd_t *vmemmap_pgd_populate(unsigned long addr, int node);
>  p4d_t *vmemmap_p4d_populate(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, int node);
>  pud_t *vmemmap_pud_populate(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, int node);
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 7fec05796796..dcb023aa23d1 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -245,19 +245,26 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate_basepages(unsigned long start,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -struct page * __meminit sparse_mem_map_populate(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +struct page * __meminit __populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start;
>  	unsigned long end;
> -	struct page *map;
>  
> -	map = pfn_to_page(pnum * PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> -	start = (unsigned long)map;
> -	end = (unsigned long)(map + PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +	/*
> +	 * The minimum granularity of memmap extensions is
> +	 * SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE as allocations are tracked in the
> +	 * 'map_active' bitmap of the section.
> +	 */
> +	end = ALIGN(pfn + nr_pages, PHYS_PFN(SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE));

I would use PAGES_PER_SUB_SECTION directly:

	 end = ALIGN(pfn + nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SUB_SECTION);

> +	pfn &= PHYS_PFN(SECTION_ACTIVE_MASK);

	pfn &= PAGE_SUB_SECTION_MASK ?

[...]
> -static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(void)
> +struct page *populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
>  	struct page *page, *ret;
>  	unsigned long memmap_size = sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>  
> +	if ((pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK) || nr_pages != PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s: called with section unaligned parameters\n",
> +				__func__);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

Can this actually happen? We need CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP in order to use nvdimm,
right?

But I guess it is fine to have a safety net just in case.

> +
>  	page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(memmap_size));
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_map_page;
> @@ -682,15 +692,17 @@ static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(void)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> +static void depopulate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
> -	return __kmalloc_section_memmap();
> -}
> +	struct page *memmap = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> +
> +	if ((pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK) || nr_pages != PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s: called with section unaligned parameters\n",
> +				__func__);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
> -static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> -{
>  	if (is_vmalloc_addr(memmap))
>  		vfree(memmap);
>  	else
> @@ -761,12 +773,13 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_one_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EEXIST)
>  		return ret;
>  	ret = 0;
> -	memmap = kmalloc_section_memmap(section_nr, nid, altmap);
> +	memmap = populate_section_memmap(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION, nid,
> +			altmap);
>  	if (!memmap)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	usage = kzalloc(mem_section_usage_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!usage) {
> -		__kfree_section_memmap(memmap, altmap);
> +		depopulate_section_memmap(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION, altmap);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -788,7 +801,7 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_one_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  out:
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		kfree(usage);
> -		__kfree_section_memmap(memmap, altmap);
> +		depopulate_section_memmap(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION, altmap);
>  	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -825,7 +838,8 @@ static inline void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
>  #endif
>  
>  static void free_section_usage(struct page *memmap,
> -		struct mem_section_usage *usage, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +		struct mem_section_usage *usage, unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
>  	struct page *usage_page;
>  
> @@ -839,7 +853,7 @@ static void free_section_usage(struct page *memmap,
>  	if (PageSlab(usage_page) || PageCompound(usage_page)) {
>  		kfree(usage);
>  		if (memmap)
> -			__kfree_section_memmap(memmap, altmap);
> +			depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -868,7 +882,8 @@ void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms,
>  
>  	clear_hwpoisoned_pages(memmap + map_offset,
>  			PAGES_PER_SECTION - map_offset);
> -	free_section_usage(memmap, usage, altmap);
> +	free_section_usage(memmap, usage, section_nr_to_pfn(__section_nr(ms)),
> +			PAGES_PER_SECTION, altmap);
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/12] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap()
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 10:46:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190503084603.GE15740@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155677654842.2336373.17000900051843592636.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:55:48PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Allow sub-section sized ranges to be added to the memmap.
> populate_section_memmap() takes an explict pfn range rather than
> assuming a full section, and those parameters are plumbed all the way
> through to vmmemap_populate(). There should be no sub-section usage in
> current deployments. New warnings are added to clarify which memmap
> allocation paths are sub-section capable.
> 
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |    4 ++-
>  include/linux/mm.h    |    4 ++-
>  mm/sparse-vmemmap.c   |   21 +++++++++++------
>  mm/sparse.c           |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 20d14254b686..bb018d09d2dc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -1457,7 +1457,9 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
> +	if (end - start < PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct page))
maybe just:

	if (PHYS_PFN(end) - PHYS_PFN(start) < PAGES_PER_SECTION) ?
> +		err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node);
> +	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
>  		err = vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap);
>  	else if (altmap) {
>  		pr_err_once("%s: no cpu support for altmap allocations\n",

Although the following looks more clear to me:

int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
                struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
{
        int err;
        bool partial_section = (PHYS_PFN(end) - PFN_PHYS(start)) < PAGES_PER_SECTION;

        if (partial_section || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
                err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node);
        else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
                err = vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap);
        else if (altmap) {
                pr_err_once("%s: no cpu support for altmap allocations\n",
                                __func__);
                err = -ENOMEM;
        }

        if (!err)
                sync_global_pgds(start, end - 1);
        return err;
}

> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 0e8834ac32b7..5360a0e4051d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2748,8 +2748,8 @@ const char * arch_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>  void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long rip);
>  
>  void *sparse_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size);
> -struct page *sparse_mem_map_populate(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap);
> +struct page * __populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap);
>  pgd_t *vmemmap_pgd_populate(unsigned long addr, int node);
>  p4d_t *vmemmap_p4d_populate(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, int node);
>  pud_t *vmemmap_pud_populate(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, int node);
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 7fec05796796..dcb023aa23d1 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -245,19 +245,26 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate_basepages(unsigned long start,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -struct page * __meminit sparse_mem_map_populate(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +struct page * __meminit __populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start;
>  	unsigned long end;
> -	struct page *map;
>  
> -	map = pfn_to_page(pnum * PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> -	start = (unsigned long)map;
> -	end = (unsigned long)(map + PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +	/*
> +	 * The minimum granularity of memmap extensions is
> +	 * SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE as allocations are tracked in the
> +	 * 'map_active' bitmap of the section.
> +	 */
> +	end = ALIGN(pfn + nr_pages, PHYS_PFN(SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE));

I would use PAGES_PER_SUB_SECTION directly:

	 end = ALIGN(pfn + nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SUB_SECTION);

> +	pfn &= PHYS_PFN(SECTION_ACTIVE_MASK);

	pfn &= PAGE_SUB_SECTION_MASK ?

[...]
> -static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(void)
> +struct page *populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
>  	struct page *page, *ret;
>  	unsigned long memmap_size = sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
>  
> +	if ((pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK) || nr_pages != PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s: called with section unaligned parameters\n",
> +				__func__);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

Can this actually happen? We need CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP in order to use nvdimm,
right?

But I guess it is fine to have a safety net just in case.

> +
>  	page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(memmap_size));
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_map_page;
> @@ -682,15 +692,17 @@ static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(void)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> +static void depopulate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>  		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
> -	return __kmalloc_section_memmap();
> -}
> +	struct page *memmap = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> +
> +	if ((pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK) || nr_pages != PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		WARN(1, "%s: called with section unaligned parameters\n",
> +				__func__);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
> -static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap,
> -		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> -{
>  	if (is_vmalloc_addr(memmap))
>  		vfree(memmap);
>  	else
> @@ -761,12 +773,13 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_one_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EEXIST)
>  		return ret;
>  	ret = 0;
> -	memmap = kmalloc_section_memmap(section_nr, nid, altmap);
> +	memmap = populate_section_memmap(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION, nid,
> +			altmap);
>  	if (!memmap)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	usage = kzalloc(mem_section_usage_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!usage) {
> -		__kfree_section_memmap(memmap, altmap);
> +		depopulate_section_memmap(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION, altmap);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -788,7 +801,7 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_one_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  out:
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		kfree(usage);
> -		__kfree_section_memmap(memmap, altmap);
> +		depopulate_section_memmap(start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION, altmap);
>  	}
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -825,7 +838,8 @@ static inline void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
>  #endif
>  
>  static void free_section_usage(struct page *memmap,
> -		struct mem_section_usage *usage, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> +		struct mem_section_usage *usage, unsigned long pfn,
> +		unsigned long nr_pages, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>  {
>  	struct page *usage_page;
>  
> @@ -839,7 +853,7 @@ static void free_section_usage(struct page *memmap,
>  	if (PageSlab(usage_page) || PageCompound(usage_page)) {
>  		kfree(usage);
>  		if (memmap)
> -			__kfree_section_memmap(memmap, altmap);
> +			depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -868,7 +882,8 @@ void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms,
>  
>  	clear_hwpoisoned_pages(memmap + map_offset,
>  			PAGES_PER_SECTION - map_offset);
> -	free_section_usage(memmap, usage, altmap);
> +	free_section_usage(memmap, usage, section_nr_to_pfn(__section_nr(ms)),
> +			PAGES_PER_SECTION, altmap);
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-03  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-02  5:55 [PATCH v7 00/12] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03  7:35   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03  8:06   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-03  8:06     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02  7:48   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02  7:48     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02 14:03     ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03  7:31       ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-03  7:31         ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-03 19:52   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone, pgdat}_span for sub-section removal Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03  8:46   ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2019-05-03  8:46     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] mm/hotplug: Kill is_dev_zone() usage in __remove_pages() Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02 11:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-02 11:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-03  7:37   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-03  7:37     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02  5:55 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] mm: Kill is_dev_zone() helper Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:55   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03 11:00   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-03 11:00     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02  5:56 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03 12:56   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-03 12:56     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-06-04  4:17     ` Dan Williams
2019-06-04  4:17       ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams
2019-05-02  5:56   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190503084603.GE15740@linux \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.