All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbusch@kernel.org (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Use non-operational power state instead of D3 on Suspend-to-Idle
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:36:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510153658.GI9675@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E4999C-DBE8-4FC1-8E82-17FEDFDA9CA6@canonical.com>

On Fri, May 10, 2019@11:15:05PM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> Sorry, I should mention that I use a slightly modified drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 3e4fb891a95a..ece428ce6876 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/once.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>  #include <linux/t10-pi.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> @@ -2833,6 +2834,11 @@ static int nvme_suspend(struct device *dev)
>         struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>         struct nvme_dev *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> +       if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) {
> +               nvme_set_power(&ndev->ctrl, ndev->ctrl.npss);
> +               pci_save_state(pdev);
> +       }
> +
>         nvme_dev_disable(ndev, true);

This won't work because you're falling through to nvme_dev_disable after
setting the power, so the resume side would certainly fail.

This is what you'd want:

       if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) {
               pci_save_state(pdev);
               return nvme_set_power(&ndev->ctrl, ndev->ctrl.npss);
       }

>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2842,6 +2848,10 @@ static int nvme_resume(struct device *dev)
>         struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>         struct nvme_dev *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> +       if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) {
> +               return nvme_set_power(&ndev->ctrl, 0);
> +       }
> +
>         nvme_reset_ctrl(&ndev->ctrl);
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> Does pci_save_state() here enough to prevent the device enter to D3?

Yes, saving the state during suspend will prevent pci pm from assuming
control over this device's power. It's a bit non-intuitive as Christoph
mentioned, so we'll need to make that clear in the comments. For
reference, here's the relevant part in pci-driver.c:

---
static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
...

	if (!pci_dev->state_saved) {
		pci_save_state(pci_dev);
		if (pci_power_manageable(pci_dev))
			pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
	}
...
}
--

So by saving the state in our suspend callback, pci will skip
pci_prepare_to_sleep(), which is what's setting your device most likely
to a D3hot, undermining our nvme power state setting.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Use non-operational power state instead of D3 on Suspend-to-Idle
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 09:36:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510153658.GI9675@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E4999C-DBE8-4FC1-8E82-17FEDFDA9CA6@canonical.com>

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:15:05PM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> Sorry, I should mention that I use a slightly modified drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 3e4fb891a95a..ece428ce6876 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/once.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>  #include <linux/t10-pi.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> @@ -2833,6 +2834,11 @@ static int nvme_suspend(struct device *dev)
>         struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>         struct nvme_dev *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> +       if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) {
> +               nvme_set_power(&ndev->ctrl, ndev->ctrl.npss);
> +               pci_save_state(pdev);
> +       }
> +
>         nvme_dev_disable(ndev, true);

This won't work because you're falling through to nvme_dev_disable after
setting the power, so the resume side would certainly fail.

This is what you'd want:

       if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) {
               pci_save_state(pdev);
               return nvme_set_power(&ndev->ctrl, ndev->ctrl.npss);
       }

>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2842,6 +2848,10 @@ static int nvme_resume(struct device *dev)
>         struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>         struct nvme_dev *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> +       if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) {
> +               return nvme_set_power(&ndev->ctrl, 0);
> +       }
> +
>         nvme_reset_ctrl(&ndev->ctrl);
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> Does pci_save_state() here enough to prevent the device enter to D3?

Yes, saving the state during suspend will prevent pci pm from assuming
control over this device's power. It's a bit non-intuitive as Christoph
mentioned, so we'll need to make that clear in the comments. For
reference, here's the relevant part in pci-driver.c:

---
static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
...

	if (!pci_dev->state_saved) {
		pci_save_state(pci_dev);
		if (pci_power_manageable(pci_dev))
			pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
	}
...
}
--

So by saving the state in our suspend callback, pci will skip
pci_prepare_to_sleep(), which is what's setting your device most likely
to a D3hot, undermining our nvme power state setting.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-10 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-08 18:59 [PATCH] nvme-pci: Use non-operational power state instead of D3 on Suspend-to-Idle Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-08 18:59 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-08 19:15 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-08 19:15   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-05-08 19:16 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-08 19:16   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-08 19:30   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-08 19:30     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-08 19:38     ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-08 19:38       ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-08 19:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 19:51         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-08 20:28         ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-08 20:28           ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09  6:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  6:12             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  6:48             ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09  6:48               ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09  6:52               ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  6:52                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  9:19                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09  9:19                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09  9:25                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  9:25                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  9:25                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09 20:48                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09 20:48                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09  9:07               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09  9:07                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09  9:42                 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09  9:42                   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09  9:56                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09  9:56                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09 10:28                     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09 10:28                       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09 10:31                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09 10:31                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-09 11:59                         ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09 11:59                           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-09 18:57                           ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 18:57                             ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 18:57                             ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 19:28                             ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 19:28                               ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 20:54                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09 20:54                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09 21:16                                 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 21:16                                   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 21:39                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09 21:39                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-09 21:37                               ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 21:37                                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 21:37                                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 21:54                                 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 21:54                                   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 22:19                                   ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 22:19                                     ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-09 22:19                                     ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-05-10  6:05                                     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-10  6:05                                       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-05-10  8:23                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-10  8:23                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-05-10 13:52                                         ` Keith Busch
2019-05-10 13:52                                           ` Keith Busch
2019-05-10 15:15                                         ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-05-10 15:15                                           ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-05-10 15:36                                           ` Keith Busch [this message]
2019-05-10 15:36                                             ` Keith Busch
2019-05-10 14:02                                       ` Keith Busch
2019-05-10 14:02                                         ` Keith Busch
2019-05-10 15:18                                         ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-05-10 15:18                                           ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-05-10 15:49                                           ` hch
2019-05-10 15:49                                             ` hch
2019-05-10  5:30                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-10  5:30                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-10 13:51                                 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-10 13:51                                   ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 16:20                       ` Keith Busch
2019-05-09 16:20                         ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190510153658.GI9675@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.