From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] clk: at91: sckc: add support to specify registers bit offsets
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 23:32:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510213242.GE7622@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557487388-32098-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
On 10/05/2019 11:23:31+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>
> Different IPs uses different bit offsets in registers for the same
> functionality, thus adapt the driver to support this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> index 6c55a7a86f79..2a4ac548de80 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> @@ -22,15 +22,23 @@
> #define SLOWCK_SW_TIME_USEC ((SLOWCK_SW_CYCLES * USEC_PER_SEC) / \
> SLOW_CLOCK_FREQ)
>
> -#define AT91_SCKC_CR 0x00
> -#define AT91_SCKC_RCEN (1 << 0)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN (1 << 1)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP (1 << 2)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSCSEL (1 << 3)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_CR 0x00
> +#define AT91_SCKC_RCEN(off) ((off)->cr_rcen)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(off) ((off)->cr_osc32en)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(off) ((off)->cr_osc32byp)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSCSEL(off) ((off)->cr_oscsel)
> +
> +struct clk_slow_bits {
> + u32 cr_rcen;
This bit is only used on sam9x5 so I wouldn't bother having it in the
structure, especially since its use will always be quite separate from
the other ones as it is controlling a separate clock.
> + u32 cr_osc32en;
> + u32 cr_osc32byp;
> + u32 cr_oscsel;
> +};
>
> struct clk_slow_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> };
>
> @@ -39,6 +47,7 @@ struct clk_slow_osc {
> struct clk_sama5d4_slow_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> bool prepared;
> };
> @@ -48,6 +57,7 @@ struct clk_sama5d4_slow_osc {
> struct clk_slow_rc_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long frequency;
> unsigned long accuracy;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> @@ -58,6 +68,7 @@ struct clk_slow_rc_osc {
> struct clk_sam9x5_slow {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> u8 parent;
> };
>
> @@ -69,10 +80,11 @@ static int clk_slow_osc_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> void __iomem *sckcr = osc->sckcr;
> u32 tmp = readl(sckcr);
>
> - if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP | AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN))
> + if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(osc->bits) |
> + AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(osc->bits)))
I still find that:
if (tmp & (osc->bits->cr_osc32byp | osc->bits->cr_osc32en))
would be shorter and easier to read and still fits on one line.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
sboyd@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] clk: at91: sckc: add support to specify registers bit offsets
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 23:32:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510213242.GE7622@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557487388-32098-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
On 10/05/2019 11:23:31+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>
> Different IPs uses different bit offsets in registers for the same
> functionality, thus adapt the driver to support this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> index 6c55a7a86f79..2a4ac548de80 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> @@ -22,15 +22,23 @@
> #define SLOWCK_SW_TIME_USEC ((SLOWCK_SW_CYCLES * USEC_PER_SEC) / \
> SLOW_CLOCK_FREQ)
>
> -#define AT91_SCKC_CR 0x00
> -#define AT91_SCKC_RCEN (1 << 0)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN (1 << 1)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP (1 << 2)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSCSEL (1 << 3)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_CR 0x00
> +#define AT91_SCKC_RCEN(off) ((off)->cr_rcen)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(off) ((off)->cr_osc32en)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(off) ((off)->cr_osc32byp)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSCSEL(off) ((off)->cr_oscsel)
> +
> +struct clk_slow_bits {
> + u32 cr_rcen;
This bit is only used on sam9x5 so I wouldn't bother having it in the
structure, especially since its use will always be quite separate from
the other ones as it is controlling a separate clock.
> + u32 cr_osc32en;
> + u32 cr_osc32byp;
> + u32 cr_oscsel;
> +};
>
> struct clk_slow_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> };
>
> @@ -39,6 +47,7 @@ struct clk_slow_osc {
> struct clk_sama5d4_slow_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> bool prepared;
> };
> @@ -48,6 +57,7 @@ struct clk_sama5d4_slow_osc {
> struct clk_slow_rc_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long frequency;
> unsigned long accuracy;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> @@ -58,6 +68,7 @@ struct clk_slow_rc_osc {
> struct clk_sam9x5_slow {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> u8 parent;
> };
>
> @@ -69,10 +80,11 @@ static int clk_slow_osc_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> void __iomem *sckcr = osc->sckcr;
> u32 tmp = readl(sckcr);
>
> - if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP | AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN))
> + if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(osc->bits) |
> + AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(osc->bits)))
I still find that:
if (tmp & (osc->bits->cr_osc32byp | osc->bits->cr_osc32en))
would be shorter and easier to read and still fits on one line.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-10 11:23 [PATCH v3 0/4] add slow clock support for SAM9X60 Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: at91: sckc: sama5d4 has no bypass support Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 20:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-10 20:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-10 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] clk: at91: sckc: add support to specify registers bit offsets Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 21:32 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2019-05-10 21:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-16 8:10 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-16 8:10 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-16 8:10 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-17 21:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-17 21:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-20 8:54 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-20 8:54 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-20 8:54 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add bindings for SAM9X60's slow clock controller Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 21:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-10 21:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-13 17:48 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-13 17:48 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-13 17:48 ` Rob Herring
2019-05-10 11:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: at91: sckc: add support for SAM9X60 Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 11:23 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2019-05-10 21:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-05-10 21:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190510213242.GE7622@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.