All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: masonccyang@mxic.com.tw
Cc: bbrezillon@kernel.org, juliensu@mxic.com.tw, richard@nod.at,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
	computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: Add Macronix NAND read retry support
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:41:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514094100.34d2a6ba@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB5D53BFC.6B44E7E0-ON482583FA.00090982-482583FA.000A5E93@mxic.com.tw>

Hello,

On Tue, 14 May 2019 09:53:16 +0800
masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote:

> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > >  {
> > >           struct nand_parameters *p = &chip->parameters;
> > >           struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic = (void 
> > > *)p->onfi->vendor;  
> > 
> > Why cast to void*, instead of casting directly to struct
> > nand_onfi_vendor_macronix * ?  
> 
> Due to got a warning:
> 
>  warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>   struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic = p->onfi->vendor;

You didn't look at my code, I suggested:

	mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *) p->info->vendor;

I.e, you indeed still need a cast, because p->info->vendor is a u8[].
But instead of casting to void*, and then implicitly casting to struct
nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *, I suggest to cast directly to struct
nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *.

> > >           if (!p->onfi ||
> > >               ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) ==   
> 0))
> > >                   return;  
> > 
> > So, the code should be:
> > 
> >    struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic;
> > 
> >    if (!p->onfi)
> >       return;
> > 
> >    mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *) p->info->vendor;
> > 
> >    if ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) == 0)
> >       return;  
> 
> Also got a warning:
> 
> warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code 
> [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]

No, you don't get this warning if you use my code. You get this warning
if you declare and initialized the "mxic" variable at the same location.

>  static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  {
>          struct nand_parameters *p = &chip->parameters;
>          struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic = (void *)p->onfi->vendor;

You are dereferencing p->info...

> 
>          if (!p->onfi)
>                  return;

... before you check it is NULL. This is wrong.

Please check again the code I sent in my previous e-mail:

    struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic;
 
    if (!p->onfi)
       return;
 
    mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *) p->info->vendor;
 
    if ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) == 0)
       return;  

Best regards,

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: masonccyang@mxic.com.tw
Cc: bbrezillon@kernel.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, juliensu@mxic.com.tw,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	marek.vasut@gmail.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: Add Macronix NAND read retry support
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:41:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514094100.34d2a6ba@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB5D53BFC.6B44E7E0-ON482583FA.00090982-482583FA.000A5E93@mxic.com.tw>

Hello,

On Tue, 14 May 2019 09:53:16 +0800
masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote:

> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > >  {
> > >           struct nand_parameters *p = &chip->parameters;
> > >           struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic = (void 
> > > *)p->onfi->vendor;  
> > 
> > Why cast to void*, instead of casting directly to struct
> > nand_onfi_vendor_macronix * ?  
> 
> Due to got a warning:
> 
>  warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
>   struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic = p->onfi->vendor;

You didn't look at my code, I suggested:

	mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *) p->info->vendor;

I.e, you indeed still need a cast, because p->info->vendor is a u8[].
But instead of casting to void*, and then implicitly casting to struct
nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *, I suggest to cast directly to struct
nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *.

> > >           if (!p->onfi ||
> > >               ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) ==   
> 0))
> > >                   return;  
> > 
> > So, the code should be:
> > 
> >    struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic;
> > 
> >    if (!p->onfi)
> >       return;
> > 
> >    mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *) p->info->vendor;
> > 
> >    if ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) == 0)
> >       return;  
> 
> Also got a warning:
> 
> warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code 
> [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]

No, you don't get this warning if you use my code. You get this warning
if you declare and initialized the "mxic" variable at the same location.

>  static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  {
>          struct nand_parameters *p = &chip->parameters;
>          struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic = (void *)p->onfi->vendor;

You are dereferencing p->info...

> 
>          if (!p->onfi)
>                  return;

... before you check it is NULL. This is wrong.

Please check again the code I sent in my previous e-mail:

    struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic;
 
    if (!p->onfi)
       return;
 
    mxic = (struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *) p->info->vendor;
 
    if ((mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) == 0)
       return;  

Best regards,

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-14  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-10  7:41 [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: Add Macronix NAND read retry support Mason Yang
2019-05-10  7:41 ` Mason Yang
2019-05-10  7:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-10  7:45   ` Miquel Raynal
     [not found]   ` <OF5E2BF75D.98A43E33-ON482583F6.002E7A65-482583F6.0030A2DE@mxic.com.tw>
2019-05-10  9:12     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-10  9:12       ` Miquel Raynal
     [not found]       ` <OF3A216E48.80ABBB8A-ON482583F9.002A09DA-482583F9.002AD40E@mxic.com.tw>
2019-05-13  9:59         ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-13  9:59           ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-14  2:16           ` masonccyang
2019-05-14  2:16             ` masonccyang
2019-05-10 13:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-05-10 13:37   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-05-10 13:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-10 13:53     ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-10 14:18   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-05-10 14:18     ` Miquel Raynal
     [not found]   ` <OF1EDBA487.7723094D-ON482583F9.00297ABF-482583F9.0029E3EE@mxic.com.tw>
2019-05-13  9:40     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-05-13  9:40       ` Thomas Petazzoni
     [not found]       ` <OFB5D53BFC.6B44E7E0-ON482583FA.00090982-482583FA.000A5E93@mxic.com.tw>
2019-05-14  7:41         ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-05-14  7:41           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-05-15  1:30           ` masonccyang
2019-05-15  1:30             ` masonccyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190514094100.34d2a6ba@windsurf.home \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.