From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:HARDWARE MONITORING" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: scmi: Scale values to target desired HWMON units
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:38:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514103802.GA21306@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212a00f-76f8-8f21-d19a-a5681c3668a0@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:10:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/8/19 2:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:46:35AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> If the SCMI firmware implementation is reporting values in a scale that
> >> is different from the HWMON units, we need to scale up or down the value
> >> according to how far appart they are.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >
> > Question is which tree this series should go through. I am fine with arm.
>
> Fine with me as well, Sudeep are you picking up these patches or should
> they go through HWMON and Guenter?
Sure I can pick and send it to arm-soc for v5.3
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:HARDWARE MONITORING" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: scmi: Scale values to target desired HWMON units
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 11:38:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514103802.GA21306@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212a00f-76f8-8f21-d19a-a5681c3668a0@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:10:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/8/19 2:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:46:35AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> If the SCMI firmware implementation is reporting values in a scale that
> >> is different from the HWMON units, we need to scale up or down the value
> >> according to how far appart they are.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >
> > Question is which tree this series should go through. I am fine with arm.
>
> Fine with me as well, Sudeep are you picking up these patches or should
> they go through HWMON and Guenter?
Sure I can pick and send it to arm-soc for v5.3
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-14 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-08 18:46 [PATCH v5 0/2] hwmon: scmi: Scale values to target desired HWMON units Florian Fainelli
2019-05-08 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-08 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Fetch and store sensor scale Florian Fainelli
2019-05-08 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-08 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: scmi: Scale values to target desired HWMON units Florian Fainelli
2019-05-08 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-08 21:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-05-08 21:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-05-13 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-13 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-14 10:38 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-05-14 10:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-14 16:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-14 16:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-14 16:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-14 16:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-14 16:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-05-14 16:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-05-14 17:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-14 17:00 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190514103802.GA21306@e107155-lin \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.