From: thuth at redhat.com (Thomas Huth)
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
This patch series enables the KVM selftests for s390x. As a first
test, the sync_regs from x86 has been adapted to s390x.
Please note that the ucall() interface is not used yet - since
s390x neither has PIO nor MMIO, this needs some more work first
before it becomes usable (we likely should use a DIAG hypercall
here, which is what the sync_reg test is currently using, too...).
Thomas Huth (4):
KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with
__KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
KVM: selftests: Align memory region addresses to 1M on s390x
KVM: selftests: Add processor code for s390x
KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test for s390x
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 3 +
.../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 2 +
.../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h | 22 ++
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 24 +-
.../selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/processor.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 151 ++++++++++
7 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/processor.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
--
2.21.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thuth@redhat.com (Thomas Huth)
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190516111249.gOXWXmzQlQ_woqkvL6mdbKuygYdP6zpX-xJvyNc4UGE@z> (raw)
This patch series enables the KVM selftests for s390x. As a first
test, the sync_regs from x86 has been adapted to s390x.
Please note that the ucall() interface is not used yet - since
s390x neither has PIO nor MMIO, this needs some more work first
before it becomes usable (we likely should use a DIAG hypercall
here, which is what the sync_reg test is currently using, too...).
Thomas Huth (4):
KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with
__KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
KVM: selftests: Align memory region addresses to 1M on s390x
KVM: selftests: Add processor code for s390x
KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test for s390x
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 3 +
.../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 2 +
.../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h | 22 ++
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 24 +-
.../selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/processor.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 151 ++++++++++
7 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/processor.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
--
2.21.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
This patch series enables the KVM selftests for s390x. As a first
test, the sync_regs from x86 has been adapted to s390x.
Please note that the ucall() interface is not used yet - since
s390x neither has PIO nor MMIO, this needs some more work first
before it becomes usable (we likely should use a DIAG hypercall
here, which is what the sync_reg test is currently using, too...).
Thomas Huth (4):
KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with
__KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
KVM: selftests: Align memory region addresses to 1M on s390x
KVM: selftests: Add processor code for s390x
KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test for s390x
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 3 +
.../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 2 +
.../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h | 22 ++
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 24 +-
.../selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/processor.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 151 ++++++++++
7 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/processor.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-16 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 11:12 thuth [this message]
2019-05-16 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS thuth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:22 ` david
2019-05-16 11:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-16 11:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-20 7:12 ` borntraeger
2019-05-20 7:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-05-20 7:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-05-20 8:08 ` thuth
2019-05-20 8:08 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-20 8:08 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-20 8:13 ` borntraeger
2019-05-20 8:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-05-20 8:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-05-16 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: selftests: Align memory region addresses to 1M on s390x thuth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:30 ` david
2019-05-16 11:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-16 11:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-16 11:59 ` thuth
2019-05-16 11:59 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:59 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 12:08 ` david
2019-05-16 12:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-16 12:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-16 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: selftests: Add processor code for s390x thuth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add the sync_regs test " thuth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-16 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-20 11:19 ` pbonzini
2019-05-20 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-20 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-23 10:56 ` drjones
2019-05-23 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2019-05-23 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2019-05-23 11:19 ` thuth
2019-05-23 11:19 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-23 11:19 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-20 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests " pbonzini
2019-05-20 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-20 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-20 11:30 ` thuth
2019-05-20 11:30 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-20 11:30 ` Thomas Huth
2019-05-20 11:43 ` pbonzini
2019-05-20 11:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-20 11:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-20 11:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-22 8:44 ` drjones
2019-05-22 8:44 ` Andrew Jones
2019-05-22 8:44 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=unknown@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.