From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] numa: improve cpu hotplug error message with a wrong node-id
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:50:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190527145052.258825fb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3f324cc-8226-57e9-2bf3-347d84cf189a@redhat.com>
On Mon, 27 May 2019 08:55:49 +0200
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 24/05/2019 22:14, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 04:39:12PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> On 24/05/2019 16:10, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 24 May 2019 12:35:21 +0200
> >>> Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On pseries, core-ids are strongly binded to a node-id by the command
> >>>> line option. If an user tries to add a CPU to the wrong node, he has
> >>>> an error but it is not really helpful:
> >>>>
> >>>> qemu-system-ppc64 ... -smp 1,maxcpus=64,cores=1,threads=1,sockets=1 \
> >>>> -numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 ...
> >>>>
> >>>> (qemu) device_add power9_v2.0-spapr-cpu-core,core-id=30,node-id=1
> >>>> Error: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch improves this error message by giving to the user the good
> >>>> topology information (node-id, socket-id and thread-id if they are
> >>>> available) to use with the core-id he's providing:
> >>>>
> >>>> Error: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'node-id 0'
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Notes:
> >>>> v3: only add the topology to the existing message
> >>>> As suggested by Igor replace
> >>>> Error: core-id 30 can only be plugged into node-id 0
> >>>> by
> >>>> Error: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'node-id 0'
> >>>> v2: display full topology in the error message
> >>>>>>> numa.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> >>>> index 3875e1efda3a..7882ec294be4 100644
> >>>> --- a/numa.c
> >>>> +++ b/numa.c
> >>>> @@ -458,6 +458,27 @@ void qmp_set_numa_node(NumaOptions *cmd, Error **errp)
> >>>> set_numa_options(MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()), cmd, errp);
> >>>> }
> >>>> +static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CPUArchId *cpu)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + GString *s = g_string_new(NULL);
> >>>> + if (cpu->props.has_socket_id) {
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, "socket-id %"PRId64, cpu->props.socket_id);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + if (cpu->props.has_node_id) {
> >>>> + if (s->len) {
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, ", ");
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, "node-id %"PRId64, cpu->props.node_id);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + if (cpu->props.has_thread_id) {
> >>>> + if (s->len) {
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, ", ");
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, "thread-id %"PRId64, cpu->props.thread_id);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + return g_string_free(s, false);
> >>>> +}
> >>>
> >>> turns out we already have such helper: cpu_slot_to_string()
> >>
> >> It doesn't display the node-id but the core-id. And node-id is what we need
> >> to know.
> >
> > I'm confused about what you are trying to do here.
> >
> > On v1, the message looked like:
> > Error: core-id 30 can only be plugged into node-id 0
> >
> > which is probably good for spapr.
> >
> >
> > Then I suggested you added the other cpu->props fields. e.g. on
> > PC the message would look like:
> > Error: socket-id 20, core-id 30, thread-id 40 can only be plugged into node-id 0
> >
> >
> > But you sent a v2 patch that would print this on PC:
> > Error: core-id 30 can only be plugged into socket-id 20, node-id 0, thread-id 40
> >
> > which doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Then in a reply to v2, Igor suggested:
> >
> > error_setg(errp, "node-id=%d must match numa node specified "
> > "with -numa option '%s'", node_id, topology);
> >
> >
> > Igor suggest would address the problem above. I expected it to become:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option core-id=30
> > and on PC:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option socket-id=20,core-id=30,thread-id=40
> >
> > Or maybe it could include the input node-id too:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option node-id=1,core-id=30
> > and on PC:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option node-id=1,socket-id=20,core-id=30,thread-id=40
> >
> > Both options would work.
> >
> >
> > But you implemented code that would print:
> > Error: node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'node-id 1'
> > and on PC it would print:
> > Error: node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'socket-id 20 node-id 1 thread-id=40'
> >
> > which doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> >
> > I was expecting something like:
> > Error: CPU slot core-id=30 is bound to node-id 0, but node-id 1 was specified
> > and on PC:
> > Error: CPU slot socket-id=20,core-id=30,thread-id=40 is bound to node-id 0, but node-id 1 was specified
> >
> >
>
> The idea is to provide the information to the user to help him to know
> where the cpu can be plugged when it cannot on the node-id he originally
> provided.
>
> So all the solutions you propose sounds good to me.
>
> I only need you and Igor agree on the same one.
We with Eduardo basically agree on contents/set of properties to print,
it is only different phrasing (Eduardo's suggestion is better than what we have now).
But lets get to what problem you are going to fix/improve. SO I've went ahead and tried
with following CLI:
qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1,maxcpus=4 -numa node,cpus=0-1 -numa node,cpus=2-3 -monitor stdio -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=1,core-id=0,thread-id=0,node-id=1
end it errored out with:
qemu-system-x86_64: -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=1,core-id=0,thread-id=0,node-id=1: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option
As you see we already have all user provide properties for cpu (including invalid ones) reported,
what we are missing is suggestion for valid node-id. How about following error message:
qemu-system-x86_64: -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=1,core-id=0,thread-id=0,node-id=1: invalid node-id, must be 0
>
> Thanks,
> Laurent
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] numa: improve cpu hotplug error message with a wrong node-id
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:50:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190527145052.258825fb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3f324cc-8226-57e9-2bf3-347d84cf189a@redhat.com>
On Mon, 27 May 2019 08:55:49 +0200
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 24/05/2019 22:14, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 04:39:12PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> On 24/05/2019 16:10, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 24 May 2019 12:35:21 +0200
> >>> Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On pseries, core-ids are strongly binded to a node-id by the command
> >>>> line option. If an user tries to add a CPU to the wrong node, he has
> >>>> an error but it is not really helpful:
> >>>>
> >>>> qemu-system-ppc64 ... -smp 1,maxcpus=64,cores=1,threads=1,sockets=1 \
> >>>> -numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 ...
> >>>>
> >>>> (qemu) device_add power9_v2.0-spapr-cpu-core,core-id=30,node-id=1
> >>>> Error: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch improves this error message by giving to the user the good
> >>>> topology information (node-id, socket-id and thread-id if they are
> >>>> available) to use with the core-id he's providing:
> >>>>
> >>>> Error: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'node-id 0'
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Notes:
> >>>> v3: only add the topology to the existing message
> >>>> As suggested by Igor replace
> >>>> Error: core-id 30 can only be plugged into node-id 0
> >>>> by
> >>>> Error: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'node-id 0'
> >>>> v2: display full topology in the error message
> >>>>>>> numa.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> >>>> index 3875e1efda3a..7882ec294be4 100644
> >>>> --- a/numa.c
> >>>> +++ b/numa.c
> >>>> @@ -458,6 +458,27 @@ void qmp_set_numa_node(NumaOptions *cmd, Error **errp)
> >>>> set_numa_options(MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()), cmd, errp);
> >>>> }
> >>>> +static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CPUArchId *cpu)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + GString *s = g_string_new(NULL);
> >>>> + if (cpu->props.has_socket_id) {
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, "socket-id %"PRId64, cpu->props.socket_id);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + if (cpu->props.has_node_id) {
> >>>> + if (s->len) {
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, ", ");
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, "node-id %"PRId64, cpu->props.node_id);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + if (cpu->props.has_thread_id) {
> >>>> + if (s->len) {
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, ", ");
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + g_string_append_printf(s, "thread-id %"PRId64, cpu->props.thread_id);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + return g_string_free(s, false);
> >>>> +}
> >>>
> >>> turns out we already have such helper: cpu_slot_to_string()
> >>
> >> It doesn't display the node-id but the core-id. And node-id is what we need
> >> to know.
> >
> > I'm confused about what you are trying to do here.
> >
> > On v1, the message looked like:
> > Error: core-id 30 can only be plugged into node-id 0
> >
> > which is probably good for spapr.
> >
> >
> > Then I suggested you added the other cpu->props fields. e.g. on
> > PC the message would look like:
> > Error: socket-id 20, core-id 30, thread-id 40 can only be plugged into node-id 0
> >
> >
> > But you sent a v2 patch that would print this on PC:
> > Error: core-id 30 can only be plugged into socket-id 20, node-id 0, thread-id 40
> >
> > which doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Then in a reply to v2, Igor suggested:
> >
> > error_setg(errp, "node-id=%d must match numa node specified "
> > "with -numa option '%s'", node_id, topology);
> >
> >
> > Igor suggest would address the problem above. I expected it to become:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option core-id=30
> > and on PC:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option socket-id=20,core-id=30,thread-id=40
> >
> > Or maybe it could include the input node-id too:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option node-id=1,core-id=30
> > and on PC:
> > node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option node-id=1,socket-id=20,core-id=30,thread-id=40
> >
> > Both options would work.
> >
> >
> > But you implemented code that would print:
> > Error: node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'node-id 1'
> > and on PC it would print:
> > Error: node-id=0 must match numa node specified with -numa option 'socket-id 20 node-id 1 thread-id=40'
> >
> > which doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> >
> > I was expecting something like:
> > Error: CPU slot core-id=30 is bound to node-id 0, but node-id 1 was specified
> > and on PC:
> > Error: CPU slot socket-id=20,core-id=30,thread-id=40 is bound to node-id 0, but node-id 1 was specified
> >
> >
>
> The idea is to provide the information to the user to help him to know
> where the cpu can be plugged when it cannot on the node-id he originally
> provided.
>
> So all the solutions you propose sounds good to me.
>
> I only need you and Igor agree on the same one.
We with Eduardo basically agree on contents/set of properties to print,
it is only different phrasing (Eduardo's suggestion is better than what we have now).
But lets get to what problem you are going to fix/improve. SO I've went ahead and tried
with following CLI:
qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1,maxcpus=4 -numa node,cpus=0-1 -numa node,cpus=2-3 -monitor stdio -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=1,core-id=0,thread-id=0,node-id=1
end it errored out with:
qemu-system-x86_64: -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=1,core-id=0,thread-id=0,node-id=1: node-id=1 must match numa node specified with -numa option
As you see we already have all user provide properties for cpu (including invalid ones) reported,
what we are missing is suggestion for valid node-id. How about following error message:
qemu-system-x86_64: -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=1,core-id=0,thread-id=0,node-id=1: invalid node-id, must be 0
>
> Thanks,
> Laurent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-27 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 10:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] numa: improve cpu hotplug error message with a wrong node-id Laurent Vivier
2019-05-24 14:10 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-24 14:39 ` [Qemu-arm] " Laurent Vivier
2019-05-24 14:39 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-24 20:14 ` [Qemu-arm] " Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-24 20:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-27 6:55 ` [Qemu-arm] " Laurent Vivier
2019-05-27 6:55 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-27 12:50 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-05-27 12:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-27 13:52 ` [Qemu-arm] " Laurent Vivier
2019-05-27 13:52 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-28 13:44 ` [Qemu-arm] " Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-28 13:44 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-28 13:57 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-05-28 13:59 ` [Qemu-arm] " Igor Mammedov
2019-05-28 13:59 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190527145052.258825fb@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.