From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tony.xie@rock-chips.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com,
huangtao@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and rk809)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:24:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190603072400.GD4797@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508143713.27954-1-heiko@sntech.de>
On Wed, 08 May 2019, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> I've picked up and rebased Tony's patch-series for rk809 and rk817.
> From the last iteration it looks like the regulator-portion did
> fall through the cracks, the other patches seem to be sufficiently
> reviewed/acked.
>
> The regulator-patch could either just be picked alone to the regulator-
> tree or with an Ack go through the mfd tree with the other patches.
>
>
> Original cover-letter + changelog follows:
>
> Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same,
> so they can share allmost all codes.
>
> Their specifications are as follows:
> 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same
> registers
> for these components except dcdc5.
> 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809.
> 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two.
Looks like this set is still lacking a Regulator Ack.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: huangtao@rock-chips.com, broonie@kernel.org,
zhangqing@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, tony.xie@rock-chips.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and rk809)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:24:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190603072400.GD4797@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508143713.27954-1-heiko@sntech.de>
On Wed, 08 May 2019, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> I've picked up and rebased Tony's patch-series for rk809 and rk817.
> From the last iteration it looks like the regulator-portion did
> fall through the cracks, the other patches seem to be sufficiently
> reviewed/acked.
>
> The regulator-patch could either just be picked alone to the regulator-
> tree or with an Ack go through the mfd tree with the other patches.
>
>
> Original cover-letter + changelog follows:
>
> Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same,
> so they can share allmost all codes.
>
> Their specifications are as follows:
> 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same
> registers
> for these components except dcdc5.
> 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809.
> 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two.
Looks like this set is still lacking a Regulator Ack.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-03 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-08 14:37 [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and rk809) Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] mfd: rk808: Add RK817 and RK809 support Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] regulator: rk808: add RK809 and RK817 support Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] dt-bindings: mfd: rk808: Add binding information for RK809 and RK817 Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] rtc: rk808: add RK809 and RK817 support Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] clk: RK808: " Heiko Stuebner
2019-05-08 14:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2019-06-03 7:24 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2019-06-03 7:24 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and rk809) Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190603072400.GD4797@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tony.xie@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.