All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [MPTCP] [PATCH 0/7] Minor patches
@ 2019-06-06  0:36 Peter Krystad
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Krystad @ 2019-06-06  0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp 

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 795 bytes --]

Mostly responding to some of Paolo's comments on the MP_JOIN RFC.

Peter Krystad (7):
  mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
  mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
  mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
  mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
  mptcp: parsing DSS option should use own flags field.
  mptcp: Check flags in MP_CAPABLE option
  mptcp: Refactor mptcp_established_options() to single hook

 include/linux/tcp.h   |  1 +
 include/net/mptcp.h   | 30 +++-----------
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 21 +++-------
 net/mptcp/options.c   | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 net/mptcp/protocol.c  |  9 +---
 net/mptcp/protocol.h  | 15 +++++--
 net/mptcp/subflow.c   |  5 +--
 7 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [MPTCP] [PATCH 0/7] Minor patches
@ 2019-06-07 11:24 Matthieu Baerts
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2019-06-07 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp 

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1257 bytes --]

Hi Peter,

On 06/06/2019 02:36, Peter Krystad wrote:
> Mostly responding to some of Paolo's comments on the MP_JOIN RFC.
> 
> Peter Krystad (7):
>   mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
>   mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
>   mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
>   mptcp: reduce number of pr_debug() calls.
>   mptcp: parsing DSS option should use own flags field.
>   mptcp: Check flags in MP_CAPABLE option
>   mptcp: Refactor mptcp_established_options() to single hook

Thank you for this patch-set!

As agreed yesterday at the meeting, I added patches 2 → 6 in the repo.

Please note that the first patch was also doing some refactoring that
were affecting the 6th patch ("mptcp: Check flags in MP_CAPABLE
option"). For more details about that, please see the corresponding email.

When you will send a v2 for the first and last patch, may you do a
rebase and also apply the refactoring in the code changed by the 6th
patch? Anyway I guess you should get a small and simple conflict when
doing the rebase.

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-07 11:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-06  0:36 [MPTCP] [PATCH 0/7] Minor patches Peter Krystad
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-07 11:24 Matthieu Baerts

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.