All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:36:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610184714.6786-2-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:47:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> wrote:

> Some devices might support multiple DMA address spaces, in particular
> those that have the PCI PASID feature. PASID (Process Address Space ID)
> allows to share process address spaces with devices (SVA), partition a
> device into VM-assignable entities (VFIO mdev) or simply provide
> multiple DMA address space to kernel drivers. Add a global PASID
> allocator usable by different drivers at the same time. Name it I/O ASID
> to avoid confusion with ASIDs allocated by arch code, which are usually
> a separate ID space.
> 
> The IOASID space is global. Each device can have its own PASID space,
> but by convention the IOMMU ended up having a global PASID space, so
> that with SVA, each mm_struct is associated to a single PASID.
> 
> The allocator is primarily used by IOMMU subsystem but in rare occasions
> drivers would like to allocate PASIDs for devices that aren't managed by
> an IOMMU, using the same ID space as IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Hi,

A few trivial comments inline.  May be more because I'm not that familiar
with xa_array than anything else.

Jonathan

> ---
> The most recent discussion on this patch was at:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1556922737-76313-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> I fixed it up a bit following comments in that series, and removed the
> definitions for the custom allocator for now.
> 
> There also is a new version that includes the custom allocator into this
> patch, but is currently missing the RCU fixes, at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1560087862-57608-13-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> ---

...

> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_alloc - Allocate an IOASID
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @min: the minimum ID (inclusive)
> + * @max: the maximum ID (inclusive)
> + * @private: data private to the caller
> + *
> + * Allocate an ID between @min and @max. The @private pointer is stored
> + * internally and can be retrieved with ioasid_find().
> + *
> + * Return: the allocated ID on success, or %INVALID_IOASID on failure.
> + */
> +ioasid_t ioasid_alloc(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> +		      void *private)
> +{
> +	u32 id = INVALID_IOASID;
> +	struct ioasid_data *data;
> +
> +	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +
> +	data->set = set;
> +	data->private = private;
> +
> +	if (xa_alloc(&ioasid_xa, &id, data, XA_LIMIT(min, max), GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to alloc ioasid from %d to %d\n", min, max);
> +		goto exit_free;
> +	}
> +	data->id = id;
> +
> +exit_free:

This error flow is perhaps a little more confusing than it needs to be?

My assumption (perhaps wrong) is that we only have an id == INVALID_IOASID
if the xa_alloc fails, and that we will always have such an id value if
it does (I'm not totally sure this second element is true in __xa_alloc).

If I'm missing something perhaps a comment on how else we'd get here.

> +	if (id == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +		kfree(data);
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +	}
> +	return id;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_free - Free an IOASID
> + * @ioasid: the ID to remove
> + */
> +void ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> +{
> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	ioasid_data = xa_erase(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +
> +	kfree_rcu(ioasid_data, rcu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_free);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_find - Find IOASID data
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @ioasid: the IOASID to find
> + * @getter: function to call on the found object
> + *
> + * The optional getter function allows to take a reference to the found object
> + * under the rcu lock. The function can also check if the object is still valid:
> + * if @getter returns false, then the object is invalid and NULL is returned.
> + *
> + * If the IOASID has been allocated for this set, return the private pointer
> + * passed to ioasid_alloc. Private data can be NULL if not set. Return an error
> + * if the IOASID is not found or does not belong to the set.

Perhaps should make it clear that @set can be null.

> + */
> +void *ioasid_find(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t ioasid,
> +		  bool (*getter)(void *))
> +{
> +	void *priv = NULL;

Set in all paths, so does need to be set here.

> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ioasid_data = xa_load(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +	if (!ioasid_data) {
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (set && ioasid_data->set != set) {
> +		/* data found but does not belong to the set */
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	/* Now IOASID and its set is verified, we can return the private data */
> +	priv = rcu_dereference(ioasid_data->private);
> +	if (getter && !getter(priv))
> +		priv = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return priv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_find);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
...

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:36:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610184714.6786-2-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:47:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> wrote:

> Some devices might support multiple DMA address spaces, in particular
> those that have the PCI PASID feature. PASID (Process Address Space ID)
> allows to share process address spaces with devices (SVA), partition a
> device into VM-assignable entities (VFIO mdev) or simply provide
> multiple DMA address space to kernel drivers. Add a global PASID
> allocator usable by different drivers at the same time. Name it I/O ASID
> to avoid confusion with ASIDs allocated by arch code, which are usually
> a separate ID space.
> 
> The IOASID space is global. Each device can have its own PASID space,
> but by convention the IOMMU ended up having a global PASID space, so
> that with SVA, each mm_struct is associated to a single PASID.
> 
> The allocator is primarily used by IOMMU subsystem but in rare occasions
> drivers would like to allocate PASIDs for devices that aren't managed by
> an IOMMU, using the same ID space as IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Hi,

A few trivial comments inline.  May be more because I'm not that familiar
with xa_array than anything else.

Jonathan

> ---
> The most recent discussion on this patch was at:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1556922737-76313-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> I fixed it up a bit following comments in that series, and removed the
> definitions for the custom allocator for now.
> 
> There also is a new version that includes the custom allocator into this
> patch, but is currently missing the RCU fixes, at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1560087862-57608-13-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> ---

...

> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_alloc - Allocate an IOASID
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @min: the minimum ID (inclusive)
> + * @max: the maximum ID (inclusive)
> + * @private: data private to the caller
> + *
> + * Allocate an ID between @min and @max. The @private pointer is stored
> + * internally and can be retrieved with ioasid_find().
> + *
> + * Return: the allocated ID on success, or %INVALID_IOASID on failure.
> + */
> +ioasid_t ioasid_alloc(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> +		      void *private)
> +{
> +	u32 id = INVALID_IOASID;
> +	struct ioasid_data *data;
> +
> +	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +
> +	data->set = set;
> +	data->private = private;
> +
> +	if (xa_alloc(&ioasid_xa, &id, data, XA_LIMIT(min, max), GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to alloc ioasid from %d to %d\n", min, max);
> +		goto exit_free;
> +	}
> +	data->id = id;
> +
> +exit_free:

This error flow is perhaps a little more confusing than it needs to be?

My assumption (perhaps wrong) is that we only have an id == INVALID_IOASID
if the xa_alloc fails, and that we will always have such an id value if
it does (I'm not totally sure this second element is true in __xa_alloc).

If I'm missing something perhaps a comment on how else we'd get here.

> +	if (id == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +		kfree(data);
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +	}
> +	return id;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_free - Free an IOASID
> + * @ioasid: the ID to remove
> + */
> +void ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> +{
> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	ioasid_data = xa_erase(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +
> +	kfree_rcu(ioasid_data, rcu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_free);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_find - Find IOASID data
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @ioasid: the IOASID to find
> + * @getter: function to call on the found object
> + *
> + * The optional getter function allows to take a reference to the found object
> + * under the rcu lock. The function can also check if the object is still valid:
> + * if @getter returns false, then the object is invalid and NULL is returned.
> + *
> + * If the IOASID has been allocated for this set, return the private pointer
> + * passed to ioasid_alloc. Private data can be NULL if not set. Return an error
> + * if the IOASID is not found or does not belong to the set.

Perhaps should make it clear that @set can be null.

> + */
> +void *ioasid_find(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t ioasid,
> +		  bool (*getter)(void *))
> +{
> +	void *priv = NULL;

Set in all paths, so does need to be set here.

> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ioasid_data = xa_load(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +	if (!ioasid_data) {
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (set && ioasid_data->set != set) {
> +		/* data found but does not belong to the set */
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	/* Now IOASID and its set is verified, we can return the private data */
> +	priv = rcu_dereference(ioasid_data->private);
> +	if (getter && !getter(priv))
> +		priv = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return priv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_find);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
...


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:36:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610184714.6786-2-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:47:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> wrote:

> Some devices might support multiple DMA address spaces, in particular
> those that have the PCI PASID feature. PASID (Process Address Space ID)
> allows to share process address spaces with devices (SVA), partition a
> device into VM-assignable entities (VFIO mdev) or simply provide
> multiple DMA address space to kernel drivers. Add a global PASID
> allocator usable by different drivers at the same time. Name it I/O ASID
> to avoid confusion with ASIDs allocated by arch code, which are usually
> a separate ID space.
> 
> The IOASID space is global. Each device can have its own PASID space,
> but by convention the IOMMU ended up having a global PASID space, so
> that with SVA, each mm_struct is associated to a single PASID.
> 
> The allocator is primarily used by IOMMU subsystem but in rare occasions
> drivers would like to allocate PASIDs for devices that aren't managed by
> an IOMMU, using the same ID space as IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Hi,

A few trivial comments inline.  May be more because I'm not that familiar
with xa_array than anything else.

Jonathan

> ---
> The most recent discussion on this patch was at:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1556922737-76313-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> I fixed it up a bit following comments in that series, and removed the
> definitions for the custom allocator for now.
> 
> There also is a new version that includes the custom allocator into this
> patch, but is currently missing the RCU fixes, at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1560087862-57608-13-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> ---

...

> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_alloc - Allocate an IOASID
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @min: the minimum ID (inclusive)
> + * @max: the maximum ID (inclusive)
> + * @private: data private to the caller
> + *
> + * Allocate an ID between @min and @max. The @private pointer is stored
> + * internally and can be retrieved with ioasid_find().
> + *
> + * Return: the allocated ID on success, or %INVALID_IOASID on failure.
> + */
> +ioasid_t ioasid_alloc(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> +		      void *private)
> +{
> +	u32 id = INVALID_IOASID;
> +	struct ioasid_data *data;
> +
> +	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +
> +	data->set = set;
> +	data->private = private;
> +
> +	if (xa_alloc(&ioasid_xa, &id, data, XA_LIMIT(min, max), GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to alloc ioasid from %d to %d\n", min, max);
> +		goto exit_free;
> +	}
> +	data->id = id;
> +
> +exit_free:

This error flow is perhaps a little more confusing than it needs to be?

My assumption (perhaps wrong) is that we only have an id == INVALID_IOASID
if the xa_alloc fails, and that we will always have such an id value if
it does (I'm not totally sure this second element is true in __xa_alloc).

If I'm missing something perhaps a comment on how else we'd get here.

> +	if (id == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +		kfree(data);
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +	}
> +	return id;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_free - Free an IOASID
> + * @ioasid: the ID to remove
> + */
> +void ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> +{
> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	ioasid_data = xa_erase(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +
> +	kfree_rcu(ioasid_data, rcu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_free);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_find - Find IOASID data
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @ioasid: the IOASID to find
> + * @getter: function to call on the found object
> + *
> + * The optional getter function allows to take a reference to the found object
> + * under the rcu lock. The function can also check if the object is still valid:
> + * if @getter returns false, then the object is invalid and NULL is returned.
> + *
> + * If the IOASID has been allocated for this set, return the private pointer
> + * passed to ioasid_alloc. Private data can be NULL if not set. Return an error
> + * if the IOASID is not found or does not belong to the set.

Perhaps should make it clear that @set can be null.

> + */
> +void *ioasid_find(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t ioasid,
> +		  bool (*getter)(void *))
> +{
> +	void *priv = NULL;

Set in all paths, so does need to be set here.

> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ioasid_data = xa_load(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +	if (!ioasid_data) {
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (set && ioasid_data->set != set) {
> +		/* data found but does not belong to the set */
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	/* Now IOASID and its set is verified, we can return the private data */
> +	priv = rcu_dereference(ioasid_data->private);
> +	if (getter && !getter(priv))
> +		priv = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return priv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_find);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: <will.deacon@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:36:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610184714.6786-2-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:47:07 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> wrote:

> Some devices might support multiple DMA address spaces, in particular
> those that have the PCI PASID feature. PASID (Process Address Space ID)
> allows to share process address spaces with devices (SVA), partition a
> device into VM-assignable entities (VFIO mdev) or simply provide
> multiple DMA address space to kernel drivers. Add a global PASID
> allocator usable by different drivers at the same time. Name it I/O ASID
> to avoid confusion with ASIDs allocated by arch code, which are usually
> a separate ID space.
> 
> The IOASID space is global. Each device can have its own PASID space,
> but by convention the IOMMU ended up having a global PASID space, so
> that with SVA, each mm_struct is associated to a single PASID.
> 
> The allocator is primarily used by IOMMU subsystem but in rare occasions
> drivers would like to allocate PASIDs for devices that aren't managed by
> an IOMMU, using the same ID space as IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Hi,

A few trivial comments inline.  May be more because I'm not that familiar
with xa_array than anything else.

Jonathan

> ---
> The most recent discussion on this patch was at:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1556922737-76313-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> I fixed it up a bit following comments in that series, and removed the
> definitions for the custom allocator for now.
> 
> There also is a new version that includes the custom allocator into this
> patch, but is currently missing the RCU fixes, at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1560087862-57608-13-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> ---

...

> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_alloc - Allocate an IOASID
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @min: the minimum ID (inclusive)
> + * @max: the maximum ID (inclusive)
> + * @private: data private to the caller
> + *
> + * Allocate an ID between @min and @max. The @private pointer is stored
> + * internally and can be retrieved with ioasid_find().
> + *
> + * Return: the allocated ID on success, or %INVALID_IOASID on failure.
> + */
> +ioasid_t ioasid_alloc(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> +		      void *private)
> +{
> +	u32 id = INVALID_IOASID;
> +	struct ioasid_data *data;
> +
> +	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +
> +	data->set = set;
> +	data->private = private;
> +
> +	if (xa_alloc(&ioasid_xa, &id, data, XA_LIMIT(min, max), GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to alloc ioasid from %d to %d\n", min, max);
> +		goto exit_free;
> +	}
> +	data->id = id;
> +
> +exit_free:

This error flow is perhaps a little more confusing than it needs to be?

My assumption (perhaps wrong) is that we only have an id == INVALID_IOASID
if the xa_alloc fails, and that we will always have such an id value if
it does (I'm not totally sure this second element is true in __xa_alloc).

If I'm missing something perhaps a comment on how else we'd get here.

> +	if (id == INVALID_IOASID) {
> +		kfree(data);
> +		return INVALID_IOASID;
> +	}
> +	return id;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_free - Free an IOASID
> + * @ioasid: the ID to remove
> + */
> +void ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> +{
> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	ioasid_data = xa_erase(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +
> +	kfree_rcu(ioasid_data, rcu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_free);
> +
> +/**
> + * ioasid_find - Find IOASID data
> + * @set: the IOASID set
> + * @ioasid: the IOASID to find
> + * @getter: function to call on the found object
> + *
> + * The optional getter function allows to take a reference to the found object
> + * under the rcu lock. The function can also check if the object is still valid:
> + * if @getter returns false, then the object is invalid and NULL is returned.
> + *
> + * If the IOASID has been allocated for this set, return the private pointer
> + * passed to ioasid_alloc. Private data can be NULL if not set. Return an error
> + * if the IOASID is not found or does not belong to the set.

Perhaps should make it clear that @set can be null.

> + */
> +void *ioasid_find(struct ioasid_set *set, ioasid_t ioasid,
> +		  bool (*getter)(void *))
> +{
> +	void *priv = NULL;

Set in all paths, so does need to be set here.

> +	struct ioasid_data *ioasid_data;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ioasid_data = xa_load(&ioasid_xa, ioasid);
> +	if (!ioasid_data) {
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	if (set && ioasid_data->set != set) {
> +		/* data found but does not belong to the set */
> +		priv = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	/* Now IOASID and its set is verified, we can return the private data */
> +	priv = rcu_dereference(ioasid_data->private);
> +	if (getter && !getter(priv))
> +		priv = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return priv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ioasid_find);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
...


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-10 18:47 [PATCH 0/8] iommu: Add auxiliary domain and PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11  9:36   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-06-11  9:36     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11  9:36     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11  9:36     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 18:13       ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 18:13         ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 18:13         ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 18:13         ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 14:22         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 14:22           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 14:22           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 14:22           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 17:05           ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 17:05             ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 17:05             ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 17:05             ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-19 14:26             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-19 14:26               ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-19 14:26               ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 12:26   ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 12:26     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 12:26     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 14:37     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:37       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:37       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 17:10       ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 17:10         ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 17:10         ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-11 17:10         ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-12 11:30         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-12 11:30           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-12 11:30           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: document PASID property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support platform SSID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11  9:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11  9:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11  9:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11  9:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-18 18:08   ` Will Deacon
2019-06-18 18:08     ` Will Deacon
2019-06-18 18:08     ` Will Deacon
2019-06-19 11:53     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-19 11:53       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-19 11:53       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 14:51     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:51       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:51       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:19     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:19     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:19     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-26 18:00   ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26 18:00     ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26 18:00     ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26 18:00     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-04  9:33     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-04  9:33       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-04  9:33       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:57     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:57       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 14:57       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08 15:31   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08 15:31     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08 15:31     ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:01     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:01       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:01       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:01       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:24     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:24     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:24     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-07-08 15:13   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08 15:13     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08 15:13     ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:05     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:05       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support auxiliary domains Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-26 17:59   ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26 17:59     ` Will Deacon
2019-06-26 17:59     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-05 16:29     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-05 16:29       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-05 16:29       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:06     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:06       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:06       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-10 18:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 10:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 10:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-11 14:35     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-11 14:35       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-07-08  7:58   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-07-08  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-09-19 15:10     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:10       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-09-19 15:10       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611103625.00001399@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.