From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coresight: Set affinity to invalid for missing CPU phandle
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:39:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620173908.GA5581@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49d6554536047b9f5526c4ea33990b7c904673d3.1561037262.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Hi Sai,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 07:15:46PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Affinity defaults to CPU0 in case of missing CPU phandle
> and this leads to crashes in some cases because of such
> wrong assumption. Fix this by returning -ENODEV in
> coresight platform for such cases and then handle it
> in the coresight drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
> index 3c5ceda8db24..b1ea60c210e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
> @@ -160,15 +160,17 @@ static int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device *dev)
>
> if (!dev->of_node)
> return 0;
An error should be returned if the above condition is true.
> +
Spurious newline
> dn = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "cpu", 0);
> - /* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
> +
> + /* Affinity defaults to invalid if no cpu nodes are found*/
> if (!dn)
> - return 0;
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(dn);
> of_node_put(dn);
>
> - /* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
> - return (cpu < 0) ? 0 : cpu;
> + return cpu;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coresight: Set affinity to invalid for missing CPU phandle
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:39:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620173908.GA5581@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49d6554536047b9f5526c4ea33990b7c904673d3.1561037262.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Hi Sai,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 07:15:46PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Affinity defaults to CPU0 in case of missing CPU phandle
> and this leads to crashes in some cases because of such
> wrong assumption. Fix this by returning -ENODEV in
> coresight platform for such cases and then handle it
> in the coresight drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
> index 3c5ceda8db24..b1ea60c210e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
> @@ -160,15 +160,17 @@ static int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device *dev)
>
> if (!dev->of_node)
> return 0;
An error should be returned if the above condition is true.
> +
Spurious newline
> dn = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "cpu", 0);
> - /* Affinity defaults to CPU0 */
> +
> + /* Affinity defaults to invalid if no cpu nodes are found*/
> if (!dn)
> - return 0;
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(dn);
> of_node_put(dn);
>
> - /* Affinity to CPU0 if no cpu nodes are found */
> - return (cpu < 0) ? 0 : cpu;
> + return cpu;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 13:45 [PATCH 0/2] coresight: Set affinity to invalid for missing CPU phandle Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-20 13:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-20 14:54 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 14:54 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 17:39 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2019-06-20 17:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-06-20 18:05 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 18:05 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] coresight: Abort probe " Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 13:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-20 13:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-20 14:55 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 14:55 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 15:23 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-20 15:23 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-20 16:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 16:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-06-20 17:43 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-06-20 18:07 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-06-20 18:07 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190620173908.GA5581@xps15 \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.