From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in 543cea9a - was: Re: Kernel problem on rx2800 i2
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:00:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625120024.GA3979@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d62aadd-67b6-da13-53cc-4b5213de8937@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 01:21:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Ok, that looks much better now with the second patch:
> > ...even after a second reboot for verification. Great!(
> > (...)
> > I assume this won't affect UMA Itaniums or should I check on one of my
> > other Integrities if this change breaks the kernel on them?
>
> Nice! I just assume we won't be able to use the patch "as is" as it would
> potentially break other architectures if I'm not mistaken.
It doesn't actually _break_ anything, but it regresses in not doing
node local allocations. Give me some time to dig through the ia64
code to figure out if I can make sense of this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 6:40 Regression in 543cea9a - was: Re: Kernel problem on rx2800 i2 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-06-25 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 6:46 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-06-25 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 6:54 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-06-25 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 7:26 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 8:16 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 8:38 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 9:30 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 10:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 10:46 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 11:19 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 11:21 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-06-25 12:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-06-25 12:08 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-25 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25 15:52 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-06-28 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28 7:35 ` Frank Scheiner
2019-08-05 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-05 8:16 ` Frank Scheiner
2020-08-05 19:43 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-05 20:27 ` Jessica Clarke
2020-08-05 21:27 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-08-05 22:41 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-23 15:02 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-03-23 15:14 ` Frank Scheiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190625120024.GA3979@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.