From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
To: yibin.gong@nxp.com
Cc: robh@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] add edma2 for i.mx7ulp
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:56:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625205617.GA24968@jerusalem> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625094324.19196-1-yibin.gong@nxp.com>
Hi Robin,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:43:18PM +0800, yibin.gong@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com>
>
> This patch set add new version of edma for i.mx7ulp, the main changes
> are as belows:
> 1. only one dmamux.
> 2. another clock dma_clk except dmamux clk.
> 3. 16 independent interrupts instead of only one interrupt for
> all channels
> For the first change, need modify fsl-edma-common.c and mcf-edma,
> so create the first two patches to prepare without any function impact.
>
> For the third change, need request single irq for every channel with
> the legacy handler. But actually 2 dma channels share one interrupt(16
> channel interrupts, but 32 channels.),ch0/ch16,ch1/ch17... For now, just
> simply request irq without IRQF_SHARED flag, since 16 channels are enough
> on i.mx7ulp whose M4 domain own some peripherals.
>
> change from v1:
> 1. check .data of 'of_device_id' in probe instead of compatible name.
>
> change from v2:
> 1. move the difference between edma and edma2 into driver data so that
> no need version checking in fsl-edma.c.
>
> change from v3:
> 1. remove duplicated 'version' and 'dmamux_nr' in 'struct fsl_edma_engine'
> since they are included in drvdata already.
> 2. downgrade print log level.
> 3. address some minor indent issues raised by Vinod.
>
> change from v4:
> 1. correct typo.
>
> Robin Gong (6):
> dmaengine: fsl-edma: add drvdata for fsl-edma
> dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: move dmamux register to another single
> function
> dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: version check for v2 instead
> dt-bindings: dma: fsl-edma: add new i.mx7ulp-edma
> dmaengine: fsl-edma: add i.mx7ulp edma2 version support
> ARM: dts: imx7ulp: add edma device node
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-edma.txt | 44 ++++++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7ulp.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c | 83 ++++++++++------
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.h | 14 ++-
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c | 11 ++-
> 6 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
I tested the patch-set on ColdFire mcf5441x (stmark2 board), all works fine.
Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
Regards,
Angelo
> --
> 2.7.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
To: yibin.gong@nxp.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
shawnguo@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] add edma2 for i.mx7ulp
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:56:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625205617.GA24968@jerusalem> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625094324.19196-1-yibin.gong@nxp.com>
Hi Robin,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:43:18PM +0800, yibin.gong@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com>
>
> This patch set add new version of edma for i.mx7ulp, the main changes
> are as belows:
> 1. only one dmamux.
> 2. another clock dma_clk except dmamux clk.
> 3. 16 independent interrupts instead of only one interrupt for
> all channels
> For the first change, need modify fsl-edma-common.c and mcf-edma,
> so create the first two patches to prepare without any function impact.
>
> For the third change, need request single irq for every channel with
> the legacy handler. But actually 2 dma channels share one interrupt(16
> channel interrupts, but 32 channels.),ch0/ch16,ch1/ch17... For now, just
> simply request irq without IRQF_SHARED flag, since 16 channels are enough
> on i.mx7ulp whose M4 domain own some peripherals.
>
> change from v1:
> 1. check .data of 'of_device_id' in probe instead of compatible name.
>
> change from v2:
> 1. move the difference between edma and edma2 into driver data so that
> no need version checking in fsl-edma.c.
>
> change from v3:
> 1. remove duplicated 'version' and 'dmamux_nr' in 'struct fsl_edma_engine'
> since they are included in drvdata already.
> 2. downgrade print log level.
> 3. address some minor indent issues raised by Vinod.
>
> change from v4:
> 1. correct typo.
>
> Robin Gong (6):
> dmaengine: fsl-edma: add drvdata for fsl-edma
> dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: move dmamux register to another single
> function
> dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: version check for v2 instead
> dt-bindings: dma: fsl-edma: add new i.mx7ulp-edma
> dmaengine: fsl-edma: add i.mx7ulp edma2 version support
> ARM: dts: imx7ulp: add edma device node
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-edma.txt | 44 ++++++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7ulp.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c | 83 ++++++++++------
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.h | 14 ++-
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c | 11 ++-
> 6 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
I tested the patch-set on ColdFire mcf5441x (stmark2 board), all works fine.
Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
Regards,
Angelo
> --
> 2.7.4
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
To: yibin.gong@nxp.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
shawnguo@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] add edma2 for i.mx7ulp
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:56:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625205617.GA24968@jerusalem> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625094324.19196-1-yibin.gong@nxp.com>
Hi Robin,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:43:18PM +0800, yibin.gong@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com>
>
> This patch set add new version of edma for i.mx7ulp, the main changes
> are as belows:
> 1. only one dmamux.
> 2. another clock dma_clk except dmamux clk.
> 3. 16 independent interrupts instead of only one interrupt for
> all channels
> For the first change, need modify fsl-edma-common.c and mcf-edma,
> so create the first two patches to prepare without any function impact.
>
> For the third change, need request single irq for every channel with
> the legacy handler. But actually 2 dma channels share one interrupt(16
> channel interrupts, but 32 channels.),ch0/ch16,ch1/ch17... For now, just
> simply request irq without IRQF_SHARED flag, since 16 channels are enough
> on i.mx7ulp whose M4 domain own some peripherals.
>
> change from v1:
> 1. check .data of 'of_device_id' in probe instead of compatible name.
>
> change from v2:
> 1. move the difference between edma and edma2 into driver data so that
> no need version checking in fsl-edma.c.
>
> change from v3:
> 1. remove duplicated 'version' and 'dmamux_nr' in 'struct fsl_edma_engine'
> since they are included in drvdata already.
> 2. downgrade print log level.
> 3. address some minor indent issues raised by Vinod.
>
> change from v4:
> 1. correct typo.
>
> Robin Gong (6):
> dmaengine: fsl-edma: add drvdata for fsl-edma
> dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: move dmamux register to another single
> function
> dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: version check for v2 instead
> dt-bindings: dma: fsl-edma: add new i.mx7ulp-edma
> dmaengine: fsl-edma: add i.mx7ulp edma2 version support
> ARM: dts: imx7ulp: add edma device node
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-edma.txt | 44 ++++++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7ulp.dtsi | 28 ++++++
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c | 83 ++++++++++------
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.h | 14 ++-
> drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/dma/mcf-edma.c | 11 ++-
> 6 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
I tested the patch-set on ColdFire mcf5441x (stmark2 board), all works fine.
Tested-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo@sysam.it>
Regards,
Angelo
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 9:43 [PATCH v5 0/6] add edma2 for i.mx7ulp yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dmaengine: fsl-edma: add drvdata for fsl-edma yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: move dmamux register to another single function yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] dmaengine: fsl-edma-common: version check for v2 instead yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: dma: fsl-edma: add new i.mx7ulp-edma yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] dmaengine: fsl-edma: add i.mx7ulp edma2 version support yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] ARM: dts: imx7ulp: add edma device node yibin.gong
2019-06-25 9:43 ` yibin.gong
2019-07-18 2:49 ` Shawn Guo
2019-07-18 2:49 ` Shawn Guo
2019-06-25 20:56 ` Angelo Dureghello [this message]
2019-06-25 20:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] add edma2 for i.mx7ulp Angelo Dureghello
2019-06-25 20:56 ` Angelo Dureghello
2019-07-03 7:58 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-03 7:58 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190625205617.GA24968@jerusalem \
--to=angelo@sysam.it \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yibin.gong@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.